US Cyber Command desires more cash for community protection

WASHINGTON – US Cyber ​​Command asked Congress for an additional $ 62 million to use the Department of Defense networks as part of its unfinanced priorities that did not make it into the command’s budget application for the budget year 2022

A copy of the list received from C4ISRNET indicated that Cyber ​​Command noted the recent SolarWinds intrusion into various government networks in its request for money to help the DoD secure its own networks and respond to malicious cyber actions. The item topped a list of four unfunded priorities totaling $ 93.4 million.

The DoD has stated that SolarWinds’ massive breach of federal and commercial networks, which is attributed to Russia’s foreign intelligence service, has not compromised its own systems.

“I ask your committee to support these priorities … to help us strengthen military readiness and alliances, protect the homeland from cyberspace attacks, and advance national interests,” wrote General Paul Nakasone, Cyber ​​Commander Command, in the proposal.

Cyber ​​intrusions and ransomware incidents are taking on epidemic status, according to some cybersecurity analysts, prompting the federal government to prioritize response efforts.

In fact, most of the Pentagon’s $ 10 billion cyber request was requested $ 5.6 billion to protect IT systems.

Cyber ​​Command’s Unfunded Priority # 2 is $ 23.3 million for cyber training. The command, by the service acquisition executives, is building an online training system called Persistent cyber training environment, which enables the armed forces to conduct individual and collective training as well as mission rehearsals.

The other two items listed are $ 3.2 million for human intelligence to help the command build an organic intelligence capability to access strategic targets and $ 4.8 million for acquisition personnel.

Sign up for the Daily Brief

Get the federal headlines every morning

(Please select a country) United States United Kingdom Afghanistan Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Territory in the Indian Ocean Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Ivory Coast Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Geor gien Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada G uadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Democratic People’s Republic of Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arabs Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mongolia Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Monaco Federated States of Mauritius Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian es territory, occupied Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitca irn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome und Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Smaller Remote Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, US Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara ara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe

Subscribe to


Cyber ​​Command has been working for several years to build an acquisition structure with Congress, which in 2016 authorized a restricted procurement agency to act as the crawl, run, run to make sure the young commando got the plan up and running.

In the latest annual Defense Act, Congress removed the $ 75 million acquisition cap for Cyber ​​Command and strengthened the commander’s powers to oversee programs and priorities. However, the services are still running large programs on behalf of the command and the joint cyber mission force.

The $ 4.8 million would be used to integrate the command Common cyber warfighting architectureguiding their acquisition priorities. Congress and the non-partisan Government Accountability Office gave the command bad marks for the architecture, citing integration and oversight problems. The command has since then tried to allay these concerns.

Defense News reporter Joe Gould contributed to this report.