lottery winner not handing out cash

HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania (WHTM) – In August 2017, Mavis Wanczyk won a jackpot of $ 758.7 million. After the Massachusetts woman won, several fake social media accounts with her name popped up
claimed she gave away money in exchange for personal information.

Four years later, new text messages are circulating claiming that Wanczyk is donating $ 5,000 to 200 random people chosen after a “spinball”. The message instructs the recipient to send a text message to a number to receive their money.

Group of five claim the biggest jackpot ever won in Pennsylvania; Ticket sold in Bucks County

The abc27 investigators called the number in the SMS. The man who replied said we had to send our full name and email address and he would forward information so we could request a check or direct deposit.

When we identified ourselves as the abc27 investigators and asked if he could answer some questions, the man hung up. An hour later we tried to call again and the phone number was no longer working.

Half a billion dollar lottery sold in PA, the state will be a big winner too

Security experts say you never open links in text messages from unknown numbers and never give out personal information to strangers.

Nathan’s Sizzling Canine Consuming Contest prize cash: How a lot will the winner make in 2021?

Get paid for hot dogs? Doesn’t sound too bad.

Well that is until you figure out how many it takes to get the profit. Last year, men’s champion Joey Chestnut ate 75 hot dogs and buns to win his fifth consecutive Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest title, while women’s champion Miki Sudo ate 48.5 to win her seventh in a row.

Sudo won’t be competing in the women this year, but Chestnut is back as a strong favorite to repeat another men’s mustard belt to take home. The winner of the mustard belt for women is much more of a question.

MORE: Schedule, start time for Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest 2021

But if you take a belt home with you, it’s nice, leaving with a check is even better. The winners – and each of the top five – will take home money in the annual competition on July 4th.

Below is everything you need to know about the prize money for Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest 2021.

Prize money for Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest

Major League Eating has typically given winners of the men’s and women’s competitions a grand prize of $ 10,000 each, with the remaining eaters receiving incrementally smaller prizes in the top five.

The total prize pool is $ 40,000. This is how the wallet is traditionally divided:

  • First place: $ 10,000
  • Second place: $ 5,000
  • Third place: $ 2,500
  • Fourth place: $ 1,500
  • Fifth place: $ 1,000

This year 17 men and 13 women are taking part in the event. The eater Michelle Lesko, who is number 9 in the world rankings – the second tallest woman behind Sudo – will be the favorite on the women’s belt. Chestnut is of course considered very likely to be the men’s winner.

What is Joey Chestnut’s net worth?

A professional career in food has done Chestnut well.

The 13-time winner of Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest – not to mention countless other major league eating contests – has a net worth of $ 2 million, according to Celebrity Net Worth. According to the website, he can make anywhere from $ 250,000 to $ 500,000 per year by winning competitions and subsequent sponsorship deals.

In addition to his profits and sponsorship money, Chestnutnut its own line of spices for hot dogs, sausages, wings and sandwiches.

Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest Past winner past

Chestnut and Sudo both set MLE records at the 2020 event. Chestnut set a personal best of 75 hot dogs and buns to extend its men’s brand, while Sudo finished a women’s record of 48.5 hot dogs and buns to surpass Sonya Thomas, who consumed 45 in 2012.

Chestnut will be back in Coney Island in 2021 to win for the sixth straight year. Sudo takes the year off because she is expecting her first child.

Below are the winners of the 1997 competition.

year winner Eaten hot dogs time
2020 men Joey Chestnut 75 10 mins.
2020 women Miki Sudo 48.5
2019 gentlemen Joey Chestnut 71 10 mins.
2019 women Miki Sudo 31
Men 2018 Joey Chestnut 74 10 mins.
2018 women Miki Sudo 37
2017 men Joey Chestnut 72 10 mins.
2017 women Miki Sudo 41
2016 men Joey Chestnut 70 10 mins.
2016 women Miki Sudo 38.5
Men 2015 Matt Stoneie 62 10 mins.
2015 women Miki Sudo 38
2014 men Joey Chestnut 61 10 mins.
2014 women Miki Sudo 34
2013 men Joey Chestnut 69 10 mins.
2013 women Sonja Thomas 36.75
2012 men Joey Chestnut 68 10 mins.
2012 women Sonja Thomas 45
2011 gentlemen Joey Chestnut 62 10 mins.
2011 women Sonja Thomas 40
2010 Joey Chestnut 54 10 mins.
2009 Joey Chestnut 68 10 mins.
2008 Joey Chestnut 59 10 mins.
2007 Joey Chestnut 66 12 min.
2006 Takeru Kobayashi 53.75 12 min.
2005 Takeru Kobayashi 49 12 min.
2004 Takeru Kobayashi 53.5 12 min.
2003 Takeru Kobayashi 44.5 12 min.
2002 Takeru Kobayashi 50.5 12 min.
2001 Takeru Kobayashi 50 12 minutes
2000 Kazutoyo Arai 25th 12 min.
1999 Steve None 21.5 12 min.
1998 Hirofumi Nakajima 19th 12 min.
1997 Hirofumi Nakajima 24.5 12 min.

Colorado Comeback Money winner Pete Vegas has sustainable agriculture plan for cash

By Alex Edwards

Boulder has new comeback cash winners in Colorado’s seed lottery. Pete Vegas received $ 1 million in prize money and Levi received a $ 50,000 scholarship as part of ongoing efforts to mitigate the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The winners were announced at a press conference held by Governor Jared Polis on Friday, streamed on Facebook. See below bit.ly/3vzGJs9. Since Levi is only 13 years old, his last name has not been disclosed.

Vegas owns Sage V (pronounced Sage Five) Foods, which specializes in making rice-based ingredients for processed foods. As a private individual, Vegas didn’t want to talk about its profits.

However, he was more than happy to talk about his plans for the money. Vegas is passionate about the environment and as a professional farmer he recognizes the negative impact modern agriculture can have on it.

“I plowed the land I had at least five times a year,” he said. “People are still following these practices and have reduced the organic matter in the soil over time.”

Organic matter contains a lot, which brings with it two problems: Plants need carbon to grow, among other things, but plowing the land disrupts and displaces the carbon that is then released into the atmosphere.

According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, agriculture can cause up to 31% of greenhouse gas emissions. Vegas plans to use some of the money won to subsidize regenerative farming for some of the farms growing for its business to help reduce that impact.

“It (regenerative agriculture) is trying to restore the soil, and it is trying to pull carbon out of the air and put it back into the ground,” he said.

And it’s not just a fad: Regenerative agriculture works.

However, widespread adoption could be an uphill battle due to government funding and policies favoring other crops like corn and soybeans. In addition, the cost of adopting regenerative agriculture will be high, simply because there is no one-size-fits-all approach.

“If you go south, where you have a lot more moisture, you have a much larger weed population, a population of insects,” he said. “Whoever does it first will lose money because we don’t know how to do it. It’s going to be an experiment. “

This is where the Colorado Comeback Cash Money comes in. Vegas said he plans to work with farmers who grow for him to test regenerative agriculture using rice crops. He plans to pay them whatever they lose during the experimental cultivation.

“It doesn’t get any government aid,” he said. “If you are interested in regenerative ag, you are on your own.”

While members of Vegas’ own older generation are more skeptical of the practice, he said that young members are open to the opportunities the practice offers.

On vaccines and public health, Vegas expressed its frustration at how superficial concerns about the vaccine appear to be. In his opinion, vaccines are viewed as something to prevent an individual from getting sick rather than for the good of the nation and the world.

“It’s not just about protecting yourself,” he said. “It’s a really selfish attitude. This is a situation where people have to think about the whole thing; You have to think of other people and what we can all do together to eradicate such a disease. “

Smallpox was eradicated by vaccination and declared eradicated in 1980 by the World Health Organization.

“Everyone’s talking about, ‘Oh, it’s safe,’ or, in this case, ‘If you get your vaccine, you might make some money,'” he said. “We’re all trying to come together and turn this disease off, and that can’t happen if some people hold back.”

Belmont Stakes payout breakdown: How a lot prize cash will the winner get in 2021?

The prices for the largest sports competitions in the world have been cut in 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic, but they will be increased again as early as 2021.

The latest example: the Belmont Stakes 2021.

The race will return in the same purse as it did in 2019 before the pandemic, with the winner also receiving the same payout as it did the year Sir Winston took first place.

MORE: Full draw and odds for the 2021 Belmont Stakes race

Here’s a look at the wallet breakdown and payout for the Belmont 2021 stakes.

What is the Belmont Stakes wallet in 2021?

As with many races in 2020, the prize pool for the Belmont Stakes was cut to $ 1 million, reducing the total prize pool by 33 percent from the previous season.

In 2021 it will rise again to the same number as in 2019: $ 1.5 million.

How much money does the Belmont Stakes winner get?

After the prize pool was cut last year, the 2021 winner will allow the Belmont Stakes winner to get a bigger prize this year.

The 2021 Belmont Stakes winner will be taken home $ 800,000, the same amount as Sir Winston, the 2019 winner. This $ 800,000 prize is 53.3 percent of the total prize pool.

Last year, Tiz the Law earned just $ 535,000 for first place.

Belmont Stakes 2021 prize pool breakdown

With the prize money of 1.5 million US dollars, the winner will receive prize money of 800,000 US dollars. How much the remaining four finishers will receive at the end of the race is not yet known.

In 2019, when the prize pool was $ 1.9 million, runner-up received $ 300,000, third place received $ 165,000, fourth place received $ 90,000, and fifth place received $ 45,000.

place Prize money
1 $ 800,000
2. TBA
3. TBA
4th TBA
5. TBA

Belmont Stakes prize money versus other Triple Crown races

The Belmont Stakes range between the Kentucky Derby and the Preakness Stakes in terms of total prize money to be awarded for 2021.

The Kentucky Derby had the largest wallet of the three horse races at $ 3 million – twice the Belmont Stakes wallet – while the Preakness Stakes were at $ 1 million.

run date Wallet (2021 numbers)
Kentucky Derby May 1, 2021 $ 3 million
Preakness missions May 15, 2021 $ 1 million
Belmont inserts June 5, 2021 $ 1.5 million

How a lot cash does the Indy 500 winner obtain? Prize purse defined

How has the Indy 500 prize fund performed?

Since its first run in 1911, the winner’s take-home check has risen from the $ 14,250 Ray Harroun received that year.

Over time, some serious financial obstacles have been overcome, particularly in 1957 when Sam Hanks took home $ 103,000, Danny Sullivan’s famous spin-and-win was worth $ 517,662, and we had our first millionaire victory as Emerson in 1989 Fittipaldi won $ 1,001,604.

Also read:

Emmo’s first victory check that year was more than the prize money from any run from 1911 to 1970! A driver’s profits are very dependent on the circumstances of the time, including the sanctions body’s financial health, as well as the details of the TV deal and ticket sales.

The winner of the race will receive approximately 20% of the prize money, which will then be used for the remainder of the 33-car field in a relay. Bonuses like pole position – e.g.: Scott Dixon won $ 100,000 for pole in 2021 – and guided laps also have a huge impact on the bottom line of any car’s winnings.

Prize money will be awarded by the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, with the money going to each entrant’s car. The drivers have contracts stating what percentage of the profits they will make, while the team owner then distributes them to the team and takes his own share.

Helio Castroneves

Photo by: IndyCar Series

What Was the Biggest Indy 500 Paycheck?

In 2009, Team Penske and Helio Castroneves took home the largest paycheck in Indy 500 history: $ 3,048,005. From his $ 2.5 million winnings in 2018 Will Power told motorsport.com of his personal terms, “I didn’t get quite 50% of it, but I was pretty close!”

Perhaps the most unlucky driver in Indy history, measured by prize winnings, was Takuma Sato. His victory in front of the first deserted Indy 500, which was held in August 2020 (due to the Covid-19 pandemic), brought him “only” 1.3 million dollars. This is comparable to the $ 2,458,129 he won in front of a packed audience in 2017.

It was doubly annoying when, before the pandemic forced a reassessment, new IndyCar owner Roger Penske previously pledged a richest purse of $ 15 million to date.

Since last year’s prize purse was crooked, here’s the breakdown of the pots for 2019 from first to last:

Item

driver

Prize money

1

Simon Pagenaud

$ 2,669,529

2

Alexander Rossi

$ 759,179

3rd

Takuma Sato

540,454 USD

4th

Josef Newgarden

$ 462,904

5

Willpower

$ 444,554

6th

Ed Carpenter

$ 450,554

7th

Santino Ferrucci

$ 435,404

8th

Ryan Hunter-Reay

$ 379,129

9

Tony Kanaan

$ 369,129

10

Conor Daly

$ 230,805

11

James Hinchcliffe

365,129 USD

12th

James Davison

$ 220,305

13th

Ed Jones

$ 233,305

14th

Spencer Pigot

$ 377,229

fifteen

Matheus Leist

$ 344,129

16

Pippa man

$ 200,305

17th

Scott Dixon

$ 359,204

18th

Helio Castroneves

$ 200,305

19th

Sage Karam

204,305 USD

20th

JR Hildebrand

$ 200,305

21

Jack Harvey

$ 200,305

22nd

Oriol Servia

203,305 USD

23

Marcus Ericsson

$ 384,629

24

Jordan King

$ 200,805

25th

Charlie Kimball

$ 200,305

26th

Marco Andretti

$ 334,129

27

Graham Rahal

$ 334,129

28

Felix Rosenqvist

$ 353,279

29

Zach Veach

$ 334,129

30th

Sebastien Bourdais

$ 342,129

31

Kyle Kaiser

205,305 USD

32

Ben Hanley

$ 200,805

33

Colton Herta

$ 351,129

And here is the all-time list, including the winner’s prize pool and reward:

year

Total purse

winner

Winning prize

1911

$ 27,550

Ray Harroun

$ 14,250

1912

$ 52,225

Joe Dawson

$ 20,000

1913

$ 55,875

Jules Goux

$ 20,000

1914

$ 51,675

Rene Thomas

$ 20,000

1915

$ 51,200

Ralph DePalma

$ 20,000

1916

$ 31,350

Dario Resta

$ 12,000

1919

$ 55,275

Howdy Wilcox

$ 20,000

1920

$ 93,550

Gaston Chevrolet

$ 21,400

1921

$ 86,850

Tommy Milton

$ 26,400

1922

$ 70,575

Jimmy Murphy

$ 26,200

1923

$ 83,425

Tommy Milton

$ 28,500

1924

$ 86,850

LL Corum / Joe Boyer

$ 20,050

1925

$ 87,750

Peter DePaolo

$ 28,800

1926

$ 88,100

Frank Lockhart

$ 35,600

1927

$ 89,850

George Souders

$ 30,625

1928

$ 90,750

Louis Meyer

$ 28,250

1929

$ 95,150

Ray Keech

$ 31,950

1930

$ 96,250

Billy Arnold

$ 36,900

1931

$ 81,800

Louis Schneider

$ 29,500

1932

$ 93,900

Fred Frame

$ 31,050

1933

$ 54,450

Louis Meyer

$ 18,000

1934

$ 83,775

Bill Cummings

$ 29,725

1935

$ 78,575

Kelly Petillo

$ 30,600

1936

$ 82,525

Louis Meyer

$ 31,300

1937

$ 92,135

Wilbur Shaw

$ 35,075

1938

$ 91,075

Floyd Roberts

$ 32,075

1939

$ 87,050

Wilbur Shaw

$ 27,375

1940

$ 85,525

Wilbur Shaw

$ 30,725

1941

$ 90,925

Floyd Davis / Mauri Rose

$ 29,200

1946

$ 115,450

George Robson

$ 42,350

1947

$ 137,425

Mauri Rose

$ 33,425

1948

$ 171,075

Mauri Rose

$ 42,800

1949

$ 179,050

Bill Holland

$ 51,575

1950

$ 201,035

Johnnie Parsons

$ 57,458

1951

$ 207,650

Lee Wallard

$ 63,612

1952

$ 230,100

Troy Ruttman

$ 61,743

1953

$ 246,300

Bill Vukovich

$ 89,496

1954

$ 269,375

Bill Vukovich

$ 74,934

1955

$ 270,400

Bob Sweikert

$ 76,138

1956

$ 282,052

Pat Flaherty

$ 93,819

1957

$ 300,252

Sam Hanks

$ 103,844

1958

$ 305,217

Jimmy Bryan

$ 105,574

1959

$ 338,100

Rodger Ward

$ 106,850

1960

$ 369,150

Jim Rathmann

$ 110,000

1961

$ 400,000

AJ Foyt

$ 117,975

1962

$ 426,152

Rodger Ward

$ 125,015

1963

$ 494,030

Parnelli Jones

$ 148,513

1964

$ 506,575

AJ Foyt

$ 153,650

1965

$ 628,399

Jim Clark

$ 166,621

1966

691,808 USD

Graham Hill

$ 156,297

1967

734,834 USD

AJ Foyt

$ 171,527

1968

$ 712,269

Bobby Unser

$ 175,139

1969

$ 805,127

Mario Andretti

$ 206,727

1970

USD 1,000,002

Al our

$ 271,697

1971

1,001,604 USD

Al our

$ 238,454

1972

$ 1,011,845

Mark Donohue

$ 218,767

1973

1,006,105 USD

Gordon Johncock

$ 236,022

1974

$ 1,015,686

Johnny Rutherford

$ 245,031

1975

USD 1,001,321

Bobby Unser

$ 214,031

1976

$ 1,037,776

Johnny Rutherford

$ 255,321

1977

$ 1,116,807

AJ Foyt

$ 259,791

1978

$ 1,145,225

Al our

290,363 USD

1979

$ 1,271,954

Rick Mears

USD 270,401

1980

$ 1,503,225

Johnny Rutherford

$ 318,819

1981

$ 1,605,375

Bobby Unser

$ 299,124

1982

$ 2,067,475

Gordon Johncock

290,609 USD

1983

$ 2,411,450

Tom Sneva

$ 385,886

1984

$ 2,795,899

Rick Mears

$ 434,060

1985

$ 3,271,025

Danny Sullivan

$ 517,662

1986

4,001,450 USD

Bobby Rahal

$ 581,062

1987

$ 4,490,375

Al our

$ 526,762

1988

$ 5,025,400

Rick Mears

$ 809,853

1989

$ 5,723,725

Emerson Fittipaldi

1,001,604 USD

1990

$ 6,325,803

Aria Luyendyk

$ 1,090,940

1991

$ 7,009,150

Rick Mears

$ 1,219,704

1992

$ 7,527,450

Al Our Jr

$ 1,244,184

1993

$ 7,681,300

Emerson Fittipaldi

1,155,304 USD

1994

$ 7,864,800

Al Our Jr

$ 1,373,813

1995

$ 8,063,550

Jacques Villeneuve

$ 1,312,019

1996

$ 8,114,600

Buddy Lazier

$ 1,367,854

1997

$ 8,612,450

Aria Luyendyk

$ 1,568,150

1998

$ 8,722,150

Eddie Cheever

$ 1,433,000

1999

$ 9,047,150

Kenny Brack

$ 1,465,190

2000

$ 9,476,505

Juan Pablo Montoya

$ 1,235,690

2001

$ 9,610,325

Helio Castroneves

$ 1,270,475

2002

$ 10,028,580

Helio Castroneves

$ 1,606,215

2003

$ 10,151,830

Gil de Ferran

$ 1,353,265

2004

$ 10,250,580

Buddy Rice

$ 1,761,740

2005

$ 10,304,815

Dan Wheldon

$ 1,537,805

2006

$ 10,518,565

Sam Hornish

$ 1,744,855

2007

$ 10,668,815

Dario Franchitti

$ 1,645,233

2008

$ 14,406,580

Scott Dixon

$ 2,988,065

2009

$ 14,315,315

Helio Castroneves

$ 3,048,005

2010

$ 13,592,815

Dario Franchitti

$ 2,752,055

2011

$ 13,509,485

Dan Wheldon

$ 2,592,255

2012

$ 13,285,815

Dario Franchitti

$ 2,474,280

2013

$ 12,020,065

Tony Kanaan

$ 2,353,355

2014

$ 14,231,760

Ryan Hunter-Reay

$ 2,491,194

2015

$ 13,397,315

Juan Pablo Montoya

$ 2,449,055

2016

$ 13,273,253

Alexander Rossi

$ 2,548,743

2017

$ 13,178,359

Takuma Sato

$ 2,458,129

2018

$ 13,078,065

Willpower

$ 2,525,454

2019

$ 13,090,536

Simon Pagenaud

$ 2,669,529

2020

$ 7.5 million

Takuma Sato

$ 1,370,500

PGA Championship 2021 purse, payout breakdown: How a lot prize cash does the winner make?

The world’s best professional golfers will gather to compete on Kiawah Island, South Carolina this week PGA championship Title and all the prestige that comes with it.

But while the recognition and automatic bid for the next five years for the four major golf tournaments is a dream for all participants, a win will also come with a nice payday.

Collin Morikawa was the last golfer to take home first place in the PGA Championship when he won the event last year for $ 1.98 million in prize money.

It will not be easy for Morikawa to repeat his victory. Only in his pairing has he been able to compete with Bryson DeChambeau No. 5 and Hideki Matsuyama, the winner of the Masters 2021. Elsewhere, Dustin Johnson (No. 1), Justin Thomas (No. 2), Jon Rahm (No. 3) and Xander Schauffele (No. 4) will try to prevent Morikawa from becoming the third golfer, who wins the event in the back-to-back years.

Below is the full purse breakdown for the 2021 PGA Championship, including the winning percentage and comparison to previous years and majors.

MORE: Complete betting guide for the 2021 PGA Championship

PGA Championship Wallet 2021

The purse for the PGA Championship is expected to be the same as it was in 2020 when the field split a prize pool of $ 11 million, the third largest pool of all major after the US Open and the Masters.

How much money does the winner get?

Collin Morikawa, the reigning PGA championship winner, took home $ 1.98 million in 2020.

PGA Championship Payouts

(Payouts reflect the 2020 PGA Championship;; “-” means the same winnings as the previous entry)

2020 PGA Championship

Golfer place Payout
Collin Morikawa 1 $ 1.98 million
Dustin Johnson T-2 $ 968,000
Paul Casey T-2 – –
Matthew Wolff T-4 $ 404,350
Jason Day T-4 – –
Bryson DeChambeau T-4 – –
Tony Finau T-4 – –
Scottie Scheffler T-4 – –
Justin got up 9 $ 295,600
Xander Schauffele T-10 $ 252,123
Joel Dahmen T-10 – –
Cameron Champ T-10 – –
Patrick Reed T-13 $ 192,208
Jon Rahm T-13 – –
Si Woo Kim T-13 – –
Daniel Berger T-13 – –
Brendon Todd T-17 $ 156,500
Haotong Li T-17 – –
Harris English T-19 $ 134,000
Kevin Kisner T-19 – –
Lanto Griffin T-19 – –
Byeong Hun An T-22 $ 94,571
Brendan Steele T-22 – –
Alex Noren T-22 – –
Adam Scott T-22 – –
Victor Perez T-22 – –
Ian Poulter T-22 – –
Hideki Matsuyama T-22 – –
Doc Redman T-29 $ 69,500
Harold Varner III T-29 – –
Tommy Fleetwood T-29 – –
Brooks Koepka T-29 – –
Viktor Hovland T-33 $ 57,500
Louis Oosthuizen T-33 – –
Rory McIlroy T-33 – –
Dylan Frittelli T-33 – –
Tiger Woods T-37 $ 45,000
Russell Henley T-37 – –
Bud Cauley T-37 – –
Nate Lashley T-37 – –
Justin Thomas T-37 – –
Webb Simpson T-37 – –
Ryan Palmer T-43 $ 31,594
Billy Horschel T-43 – –
Abraham Ancer T-43 – –
Cameron Smith T-43 – –
Keith Mitchell T-43 – –
Patrick Cantlay T-43 – –
Bernd Wiesberger T-43 – –
Mike Lorenzo-Vera T-43 – –
Eric van Rooyen T-51 $ 25,500
Adam Long T-51 – –
Joost Luiten T-51 – –
Luke List T-51 – –
Mark Hubbard T-51 – –
Brandt Snedeker T-51 – –
Kurt Kitayama T-51 – –
Kevin Streelman T-58 $ 20,000
Gary Woodland T-58 – –
Tom hoge T-58 – –
Brian Harman T-58 – –
Mackenzie Hughes T-58 – –
Denny McCarthy T-58 – –
Adam Hadwin T-58 – –
Charl Schhwartzel T-58 – –
Robert MacIntyre T-66 $ 20,400
Rory Sabbatini T-66 – –
Sepp Straka T-66 – –
Emiliano Grillo T-66 – –
Shane Lowry T-66 – –
Jordan Spieth T-71 $ 19,350
Danny Lee T-71 – –
Bubba Watson T-71 – –
Phil Mickelson T-71 – –
At Reavie T-75 $ 19,050
JT Poston T-75 – –
Matt Wallace T-77 $ 18,850
Jim Herman T-77 – –
Sung Kang | 79 $ 18,700

What are the payouts for the other golf majors?

Masters 2020

Golfer place Payout
Dustin Johnson 1 $ 2,070,000
Cameron Smith T-2 $ 1,012,000
Sungjae Im T-2 – –
Justin Thomas 4th $ 552,000
Rory McIlroy T-5 $ 437,000
Dylan Frittelli T-5 – –
CT Pan T-7 $ 358,417
Brooks Koepka T-7 – –
Jon Rahm T-7 – –
Webb Simpson T-10 $ 287,500
Corey Conners T-10 – –
Patrick Reed T-10 – –
Marc Leishman T-10 $ 215,625
Hideki Matsuyama T-13 – –
Kevin Well T-13 – –
Abraham Ancer T-13 – –
Xander Schauffele T-17 $ 178,250
Patrick Cantlay T-17 – –
Scottie Scheffler T-19 $ 144,325
Cameron Champ T-19 – –
Tommy Fleetwood T-19 – –
Sebastian Munoz T-19 – –
Justin got up T-23 $ 115,000
Louis Oosthuizen T-23 – –
Danny Willett T-25 $ 91,713
Charl Schwartzel T-25 – –
Shane Lowry T-25 – –
Ian Poulter T-25 – –
Nick Taylor T-29 $ 74,750
Bernhard Langer T-29 – –
At Reavie T-29 – –
Rickie Fowler T-29 – –
Sung Kang | T-29 – –
Adam Scott T-34 $ 62,100
Bryson DeChambeau T-34 – –
Si Woo Kim T-34 – –
Andy Ogletree T-34 amateur
Lee Westwood T-38 $ 50,600
Billy Horschel T-38 – –
Tiger Woods T-38 – –
Paul Casey T-38 – –
Christiaan Bezuidenhout T-38 – –
Tony Finau T-38 – –
Shugo Imahira T-44 $ 41,400
Collin Morikawa T-44 – –
Matt Wallace T = 46 $ 33,672
Charles Howell III T-46 – –
Matthew Fitzpatrick T-46 – –
Victor Perez T-46 – –
Jordan Spieth T-46 – –
Mike Weir T-51 $ 28,003
Jazz Janewattananond T-51 – –
Zach Johnson T-51 – –
Rafa Cabrera-Bello T-51 – –
John Augenstein T-55 amateur
Phil Mickelson T-55 $ 26,680
Bubba Watson 57 $ 26,450
Bernd Wiesberger 58 $ 26,220
Brandt Snedeker 59 $ 25,990
Jimmy Walker 60 $ 25,760

US Open 2020

place Golfer Payout
Gary Woodland 1 $ 2.25 million
Brooks Koepka 2 $ 1.35 million
Xander Schauffele T-3 $ 581,872
Jon Rahm T-3 – –
At Reavie T-3 – –
Justin got up T-3 – –
Adam Scott T-7 $ 367,387
Louis Oosthuizen T-7 – –
Henrik Stenson T-9 $ 288,715
Chesson Hadley T-9 – –
Rory McIlroy T-9 – –
Viktor Hovland T-12 amateur
Matt Fitzpatrick T-12 $ 226,609
Matt Wallace T-12 – –
Danny Willett T-12 – –
Webb Simpson T-16 $ 172,455
Francesco Molinari T-16 – –
Byeong Hun An T-16 – –
Graeme McDowell T-16 – –
Matt Kuchar T-16 – –
Paul Casey T-21 $ 117,598
Alex Prugh T-21 – –
Tiger Woods T-21 – –
Jason Day T-21 – –
Tyrrell Hatton T-21 – –
Hideki Matsuyama T-21 – –
Patrick Cantlay T-21 – –
Sepp Straka T-28 $ 86,071
Shane Lowry T-28 – –
Jim Furyk T-28 – –
Nate Lashley T-28 – –
Marcus Kinhult T-32 $ 72,928
Patrick Reed T-32 – –
Billy Horschel T-32 – –
Aaron Wise T-35 $ 57,853
Bryson DeChambeau T-35 – –
Collin Morikawa T-35 – –
Martin Kaymer T-35 – –
Jason Dufner T-35 – –
Marc Leishman T-35 – –
Dustin Johnson T-35 – –
Brandon Wu T-35 – –
Andrew Putnam T-43 $ 41,500
Rory Sabbatini T-43 – –
Erik Van Rooyen T-43 – –
Tom hoge T-43 – –
Rickie Fowler T-43 – –
Nick Taylor T-43 – –
Kevin Kisner T-49 $ 31,385
Daniel Berger T-49 – –
Abraham Ancer T-49 – –
Phil Mickelson T-52 $ 27,181
Charles Howell III T-52 – –
Carlos Ortiz T-52 – –
Sergio Garcia T-52 – –
Haotong Li T-52 – –
Scott Piercy T-52 – –
Charlie Danielson T-58 $ 25,350
Zach Johnson T-58 – –
Andy Pope T-58 – –
Adri Arnaus T-58 – –
Harris English T-58 – –
Emiliano Grillo T-58 – –
Chandler Eaton T-58 amateur
Justin Walters T-65 $ 23,851
Kyle Stanley T-65 – –
Brian Stuard T-65 – –
Rafa Cabrera Bello T-65 – –
Tommy Fleetwood T-65 – –
Jordan Spieth T-65 – –
Rhys Enoch 71 $ 22,977
Cameron Smith T-72 $ 22,353
Luke Donald T-72 – –
Gregory Sordet T-72 – –
Billy Hurley III T-72 – –
Bernd Wiesberger 76 $ 21,728
Brandt Snedeker 77 $ 21,478
Chip McDaniel 78 $ 21,224

British Open 2019

Golfer place Payout
Shane Lowry 1 $ 1.935 million
Tommy Fleetwood 2 $ 1.12 million
Tony Finau 3 $ 718,000
Lee Westwood T-4 $ 503,500
Brooks Koepka T-4 – –
Robert MacIntyre T-6 $ 313,000
Tyyrell Hatton T-6 – –
Danny Willett T-6 – –
Rickie Fowler T-6 – –
Patrick Reed 10 $ 223,000
Francesco Molinari T-11 $ 171,700
Tom Lewis T-11 – –
Justin Thomas T-11 – –
Alexander Noren T-11 – –
Jon Rahm T-11 – –
Ryan Fox T-16 $ 126,313
Lucas Bjerregaard T-16 – –
Rory Sabbatini T-16 – –
Sang-Hyun Park T-16 – –
Louis Oosthuizen T-20 $ 91,350
Stewart Cink T-20 – –
Doc Redman T-20 – –
Lucas glove T-20 – –
Erik Van Rooyen T-20 – –
Matthew Fitzpatrick T-20 – –
Cameron Smith T-20 – –
Henrik Stenson T-20 – –
Jordan Spieth T-20 – –
Justin got up T-20 – –
Kevin Kisner T-30 $ 69,875
Webb Simpson T-30 – –
Kiradech Aphibarnrat T-32 $ 56,278
Jason Kokrak T-32 – –
Bernd Wiesberger T-32 – –
Andrew Wilson T-32 – –
Joost Luiten T-32 – –
Ernie Els T-32 – –
Byeong-Hun An T-32 – –
Andrew Putnam T-32 – –
Dylan Frittelli T-32 – –
Callum Shinkwin T-41 $ 36,925
Kyle Stanley T-41 – –
Benjamin Hebert T-41 – –
Inn-choon Hwang T-41 – –
Aaron Wise T-41 – –
Patrick Cantlay T-41 – –
Justin Harding T-41 – –
Russell Knox T-41 – –
Xander Schauffele T-41 – –
Matt Kuchar T-41 – –
Shubhankar Sharma T-51 $ 28,317
Burn Grace T-51 – –
Bubba Watson T-51 – –
Matt Wallace T-51 – –
Charley Hoffman T-51 – –
Dustin Johnson T-51 – –
Ashton Turner T-57 $ 26,467
Thorbjorn Olesen T-57 – –
Kevin Streelman T-57 – –
Paul Casey T-57 – –
Adam Hadwin T-57 – –
Graeme McDowell T-57 – –
Paul Waring T-63 $ 25,800
Jim Furyk T-63 – –
Mikko Korhonen T-63 – –
Romain Langasque T-63 – –
Thomas Pieters T-67 $ 25,088
Yosuke Asaji T-67 – –
Sergio Garcia T-67 – –
JB Holmes T-67 – –

Nobel winner Daniel Kahneman’s new ebook is all about your cash

A trader works in the S&P 500 pit on the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade of the CME Group.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Nobel Prize-winning psychologist and economist Daniel Kahneman has published a new book that asks a question that is central to making the right calls in the markets and in money: why everyone makes such bad decisions and what can we do about them to do?

“Noise” was co-written with Olivier Sibony, a French expert on decision-making, and Cass R. Sunstein, a legal scholar and expert on behavioral economics. Kahneman is one of the founding fathers of behavioral research and author of the seminal work “Thinking Fast and Slow”.

My rating of the Book is here::

I sat down with DR. Brad Klontz, a member of the CNBC Financial Wellness Council to get his response to Kahneman’s central thesis that prejudice and noise (random variability in our judgments) are ubiquitous in our lives, but there are ways we can improve our judgment skills. Dr. Klontz is a CFP and psychologist and author of several books, most recently “Money Mammoth” (Wiley, 2020).

CNBC: The central thesis of the book is that people – especially professionals like doctors, judges, and financial advisors – often make very bad judgments. Radiologists do not provide a consistent interpretation of X-rays. The judges do not give uniform judgments. Financial advisors are too confident in their advice. Do you agree?

Klontz: Yes. Being an expert in a particular field can make it harder to identify prejudice, be more resilient to change, and lead to greater harm.

CNBC: Kahneman says there are “bias” issues, where people are consistently focused on one point, like a bathroom scale that is always over two pounds. However, his focus is on “noise”, which he calls “random variability in judgments” where the decision-making is random and inconsistent. Why is this happening?

Klontz: Part of the problem is that people don’t recognize the randomness of their decision-making. But there are other reasons as well. Ironically, the variability of judgment has been one of the keys to our survival as a species, although it can backfire. Many decisions are not black and white. In primitive times and today, people could die from poor judgment, so there is some natural selection there.

This problem is well known in the field of psychology. For example, any attempt to measure things, such as personality traits or the effectiveness of drugs or therapies, is a random mistake. We use the scientific method and statistical analysis to reduce random errors, but it is always a threat to our attempt to understand the objective truth.

CNBC: Kahneman recommends several ways to combat bad decisions and noise. He talks about “decision hygiene” or ways to make more consistent judgments. Does this make sense?

Klontz: Yes. I love the concept of delaying intuition and not immediately reacting to your instincts. Open-mindedness is associated with success in almost all endeavors. Don’t trust your instincts. In my last book, Money Mammoth, I talked a lot about the “tribal brain,” which is the optimal way to deal with life in a group of around 150 people. This is how our ancestors lived. It helps explain why we should be suspicious of our instincts about money because the very same instincts that helped us survive and thrive in small groups under constant threat often backfire in our modern financial lives. When it comes to money, we are essentially wired to do everything wrong.

With everyone getting into cryptocurrency, we firmly believe that we should join them. On a deep psychological level, it feels like a threat to our survival not to step in.

For example, the herd instinct is good when you are in a primitive society. If everyone is fleeing from a lion, so should you. If you choose not to follow the herd and stand still, you will be eaten. Anyone who thought you should stand still while everyone else was running has been picked up and hasn’t passed their genes on to us.

While it has helped us survive throughout prehistory, the herd instinct is bad when making modern financial decisions. With everyone getting into cryptocurrency, we firmly believe that we should join them. On a deep psychological level, it feels like a threat to our survival not to step in. That is why we have to keep guessing and fighting our natural instincts. Always guess yourself, avoid over-consciousness and stay open-minded.

More of Invest in you:
The 2020 tax returns are due on May 17th with the IRS. Here are some last minute filing tips
Concerned about volatile markets? Experts say you should stick to your investment plan
“We’re not making a profit.” The hiring of crunch hurts small businesses

CNBC: So should we have less faith in our instincts?

Klontz: We would change our world if we had less confidence in our conclusions. We keep breaking up and surrounding ourselves with people who think like us. Sometimes our beliefs are so strong that we try to hurt people who believe differently. We need to be able to observe ourselves more objectively.

Less trust would reduce conflict because we are not so anchored in our subjective conclusions.

If we spend some time between our impulses and actions, we can calm our emotional brain and activate our prefrontal cortex – the part of our brain that helps us think about the consequences of our actions. It can also give us time to seek the opinions of others.

CNBC: Kahneman also recommends that companies conduct “noise audits” that assess how consistent the assessment is in their group, whether they are radiologists, judges, or stock pickers. Your reaction?

Klontz: It’s a great idea, and the only surprising thing is that it’s not done on a regular basis. This is known in psychology. This is known as interrater reliability, which recognizes that even experts can find it difficult to agree on their analysis and conclusions. For example, the gold standard in diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder focuses on training to ensure reliability between assessments and to ensure that everyone comes to the same conclusion. And I totally agree that it should be done elsewhere. We should put much more work into adopting established methods in psychology and generalizing them to all professions, especially those that involve life and death decisions like medicine or law.

CNBC: Kahneman recommends a stricter application of rule-based decision making to escape random human judgment. Do you agree?

Klontz: Yes, especially if there is a clear indication of a right or wrong decision as to how this person has a tumor or not. When there are clear choices about life or death, we need to limit the variability of judgment. I mentioned the autism diagnosis. Here you need a structured, reliable and rule-based approach.

But we cannot become too rigid or rule-bound and we have to be open. We need to recognize that the rules will change as our knowledge base grows and be open to changing those rules when the facts change.

Also, remember that many decisions and conclusions in life are completely subjective. The idea is not so much to eradicate the variability of human judgment as to grapple with its existence and the idea that we are prone to misjudgment. Consciousness and humility are key. Realizing that we can make different judgments depending on the time of day or lunch is an important step in making better judgments.

CNBC: In one of my favorite chapters, Kahneman found that people, especially professionals, have a very high opinion of their own opinion.

Klontz: Yes, that has an evolutionary advantage. Suppose you are convinced that a famine is coming and the other is convinced that there is no famine. If you get a famine, you will be fine because you planned, but the other one is gone. Believing in your own opinion and believing other people to join you has helped us survive as a species.

But in the modern world there can be overconsciousness. For example, women tend to outperform men as investors. You are not that prone to overconsciousness. Men believe that they can outperform and end up being able to trade more. The proof is that they can’t. Again, a healthy dose of self-doubt can be very good for us.

CNBC: Kahneman also delves into the discussion about why everyone is so bad at predicting the future.

Klontz: We all know that you can’t predict the future exactly for the reasons that Kahneman said: We are full of prejudice and noise, and there is an ignorance about the future because things happen that cannot be foreseen.

However, this does not prevent us from giving it a try, and it is important to understand why. This desire to predict the future is also an evolutionary advantage. It is necessary to try to predict the future because it has helped us survive as a species. It is important to our survival. Those who are forward-thinking and concerned about the future may have survived in the past.

But that doesn’t help us that much in the modern age. We didn’t evolve much from “light means the gods are angry”. Most of our decisions are made by our emotional brain, and we have a relatively small prefrontal cortex that carries out rational thinking beyond a large emotional brain – and when we are excited or scared, our emotional brain kicks in and we are prone to Acts like our prehistoric ancestors.

So we cannot rule out attempts to predict the future because we think about it all the time. It is important, however, that we do not place too much weight on our predictions and realize that they are merely our attempts to understand a chaotic world. It is important that we recognize the limits of our knowledge and feel a little more comfortable with uncertainty.

Serbia offers award to 2019 Nobel Literature winner Handke | Leisure




Austrian author Peter Handke, right, receives the Order of the Karadjordje Star from Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic in Belgrade, Serbia, Sunday May 9, 2021. Serbia has honored Austrian Nobel Prize winner Peter Handke, who is known for his apologetic views on Serbia War crimes during the Balkans Wars of the 1990s.




Austrian author Peter Handke attends a ceremony before receiving the Order of the Karadjordje Star from Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic in Belgrade, Serbia on Sunday 9 May 2021. Serbia has honored Austrian Nobel Prize winner Peter Handke, who is known for his apologetic views on Serbian war crimes during the Balkans wars of the 1990s.




Serbia honors the Nobel Prize winner Handke for 2019

Austrian author Peter Handke speaks during a ceremony after receiving the Order of the Karadjordje Star from Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic in Belgrade, Serbia on Sunday 9 May 2021. Serbia has honored Austrian Nobel Prize winner Peter Handke, who is known for his apologetic views on Serbian war crimes during the Balkans wars in the 1990s.




Serbia honors the Nobel Prize winner Handke for 2019

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic stands during a ceremony in Belgrade, Serbia, on Sunday May 9, 2021. Serbia has honored Austrian Nobel Prize winner Peter Handke, who is known for his apologetic views on Serbian war crimes during the Balkan Wars of the 1990s.




Serbia honors the Nobel Prize winner Handke for 2019

Austrian author Peter Handke attends a ceremony before receiving the Order of the Karadjordje Star from Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic in Belgrade, Serbia on Sunday 9 May 2021. Serbia has honored Austrian Nobel Prize winner Peter Handke, who is known for his apologetic views on Serbian war crimes during the Balkans wars of the 1990s.

BELGRADE, Serbia (AP) – Serbia on Sunday honored Nobel Prize laureate in Literature, Peter Handke, who is known for his apologetic views on Serbia’s nationalist politics and Serbian war crimes during the Balkan Wars of the 1990s.

The Austrian writer and screenwriter received a state award from Serbia’s President Aleksandar Vucic, a former ultra-nationalist who now says he wants his country to join the European Union. Handke also received awards from Bosnian Serbs on Friday.

“Thank you for everything you have done for Serbia,” said Vucic. “Serbia is grateful to its friend for that (decoration).”

RTS television said Handke was recognized for “a special contribution to the representation of Serbia and its citizens in the field of public and cultural activities and for personal persistence in uncompromising responsibility to the truth”.

Handke is revered by Serbs for their support during the wars of the 1990s and the era of the late strongman Slobodan Milosevic, when the Serbs were widely accused of sparking the conflict that killed more than 100,000 people. Handke is considered a persona non grata in the Bosnian capital Sarajevo and in Kosovo, a former Serbian province that declared its independence in 2008.

Handke has also denied that the 1995 massacre of 8,000 Bosniak men and boys in the city of Srebrenica was genocidal. This contradicts several rulings by international courts that have declared the slaughter in the eastern Bosnian enclave to be genocide.

BAFTA winner Sir Anthony Hopkins: Appearing’s a part of my blood | Leisure

Sir Anthony Hopkins admitted acting was “part of his blood” when he won a BAFTA on Sunday night (04/11/21).

The “Father” star, who was named Best Actor for his role in the hit film, has insisted that he loves his job and admits that it means “no trouble” for him and the only thing he knows how to do .

He said, “It keeps me out of anger. I don’t want to sound heavy about it, but it’s the only thing I can. I don’t know how I became an actor, I had no intention of doing it.” Everything really, but it’s something that’s now part of my blood. I enjoy it, it’s kind of – I’ll keep it simple. I love it, it’s a way of life. I try not to take myself too seriously, I hope I don’t. “

And the 83-year-old actor praised the film’s “great script” and cast before joking that he didn’t have to act as much in the role as an old man and is older himself.

Speaking of his role in the film at the winner’s press conference, he added, “It was pretty easy because I didn’t have to act old – because I’m old. We had a great script and cast, and it did made.” easy. When you’re with such a great cast, Olivia Colman [and others], it makes it so easy … It made it easy to be ready to work in the morning and not feel depressed. I’m not a method actor, but when you have a perfect script it’s like a roadmap. “

The $1 billion Mega Tens of millions jackpot has a winner

MARK RALSTON | AFP | Getty Images

Someone in Michigan starts their weekend a lot richer.

A single ticket sold in Wolverine State hit all six numbers drawn on Friday night to win the $ 1 billion Mega Millions jackpot. The prize had risen through twice weekly drawings for 37 weeks with no winners. It has now been reset to $ 20 million.

When you have this precious piece of paper in hand, you should be aware that your life is about to change dramatically, experts say. And while you may be eager to claim your winnings, there is no need to rush to headquarters right away.

In other words, take a deep breath.

Protect your ticket and yourself

Put together a team of professionals

Before you go to the lottery headquarters, you should assemble a team of seasoned professionals: a lawyer, an accountant, and a financial advisor.

“You want to be thoughtful [experts] Walk you through the emotional side of winning, but also the commitment that comes with that kind of wealth, “said CPA Mark Alaimo, a member of the American Institute of CPAs’ Personal Financial Specialist Committee.

Someone on the team should also serve as the gatekeeper. That said, they can answer queries from moochers or scammers, or even friends and family members who want a piece of your godsend in the end.

The tax bill

You can choose to take your winnings either as a lump sum or as a 30 year pension. For the $ 1 billion Mega Millions jackpot, the cash option – which most winners choose – is $ 739.6 million.

However, before it reaches you, 24% – $ 177.5 million – is withheld for federal taxes. With the highest marginal tax rate of 37%, you can expect more to be due at tax time. Michigan state taxes of 4.5% would also be due or withheld.

Think philanthropically

One way to lower your tax burden is to think in a nonprofit way.

You can donate up to 60% of your Adjusted Gross Income in cash to a nonprofit or a donor-recommended fund and receive a tax deduction for the amount in the year you donate.

They can also set up a private foundation, donate their income, and then choose how to use it over time.

“A private foundation can run programs,” said Alaimo. “You could open and run a soup kitchen owned by the foundation.

“With a fund recommended by donors, you can only donate [an existing] Soup kitchen.”