‘Jeopardy!’ Clarifies Guidelines After Contestant’s Answering Type Irks Viewers

Danger! The bosses cleared the rules of the long-running quiz show after engaging in controversy over current champ Matt Amodio’s style of answering clues.

As any dedicated fan knows, the syndicated show presents the clues that participants have to answer in question form.

And while Amodio did not break the rules in that sense, his penchant for starting each of his questions with “what is” – even when the answer relates to people – has aroused anger among a faction of onlookers.

In response to the avalanche of angry audience comments, a Jeopardy! Twitter Account on Monday that read, “What’s wrong with Matt Amodio? A lot of ‘what’s’ in his response – and that’s perfectly acceptable!”

A link to the show’s website was shared where a statement read: “Over the many years that Jeopardy! was broadcast, we have seen some rare scenarios where we have to fall back on the official rules of the game.

“Streaking Champion Matt Amodio has received a lot of attention lately for his unorthodox use of ‘What’s …?’ as a template for all answers – whether animal, vegetable or mineral. Viewers and grammar police have many questions about what is acceptable. We have some answers. “

The rules, it was explained, state that “all of a student’s answers to an answer must be formulated in the form of a question,” but there are no grammar details.

“Jeopardy! Doesn’t require the answer to be grammatically correct,” the statement read. “Also, the three-letter name of a British invasion rock band can be a correct answer on its own (‘The Who?’) And even ‘Is it …?’ was accepted. So Matt Amodio’s no-frills approach is unique, but good with guidelines. “

According to the rules, participants who do not answer “Jeopardy!” In question format. Rounds receive gentle reminders from the host, although such errors score points in the ‘Double Jeopardy!’ round.

What’s wrong with Matt Amodio? A lot of “what is” in his answers – and that is completely acceptable!

Read more about other Jeopardy! Rules here: https://t.co/6Ld05LMRR4

– Danger! (@Danger) August 2, 2021

Die Hard #Danger Fans like me always carry a copy of the official rules with them anyway.

– Matt Amodio (@AmodioMatt) August 2, 2021

The statement goes on to say: “At ‘Final Jeopardy!’ The Competitor Coordinators are on the stage to confirm that bets have been entered correctly and to brief the competitors through the final steps of the game. Part of this briefing involves giving competitors the correct “who” or “what” for the final clue. “

Reaction to the danger! Amodio wrote on Twitter: “Die-hard #jeopardy fans like me always carry a copy of the official rules anyway.”

Amodio was asked about the controversy in a recent interview with Entertainment Weekly and replied, “I don’t necessarily want to say too much about it. I guess I just want to say that I hope no one is offended by this.

“I hear some people say it is disrespectful to the game and I would argue that if there was a ranking of Jeopardy! Fan clubs, I think I would have a strong argument for being the number one Jeopardy! Fan I live and breathe the show, I love every aspect of it, so I definitely don’t do it out of disrespect or undermining the show. “

The computer science Ph.D. Yale student Amodio is currently enjoying an impressive eight-game winning streak with Jeopardy! In a tweet on Monday, he revealed that he is now ranked eighth for “highest regular season game winnings” after raising $ 310,400.

After winning more than five games, Amodio returns to Jeopardy! next season for the Tournament of Champions, which he said Entertainment Weekly, which he is looking forward to “with a combination of anticipation and fear.”

“Because my competitors were extremely smart,” he explained, “but at the Tournament of Champions they filtered it to only get people who won at least five games on Jeopardy.

“It’s going to be a more competitive phase than I’m mentally prepared. That’s why I’m quite worried. Hopefully I’ll do well, but I’ll be shaking a little in my boots.”

“Danger!” Bosses cleared the rules of the long-running show after current champ Matt Amodio angered fans with his clue-answering style.
Amanda Edwards / Getty Images

New Expertise, New Technology of Viewers Inform ‘Rugrats’ Animation Fashion

When “Rugrats“Went off the air after a decade in 2006, with a handful of Daytime Emmy wins for an animated program, half a dozen Kids Choice Awards, and a star of its own on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. It was also the second-longest running animated series on Nickelodeon (“SpongeBob SquarePants” is the longest), made three films, and the franchise’s licensing and merchandising potential seemed endless.

In other words, resurrecting the comedic adventures of the animated dead was a breeze for Nick. Nick has already wiped “SpongeBob” off the shelf and is becoming one of the biggest subscription drivers for the newly launched Paramount Plus.

More from diversity

However, when Tommy, Chuckie, Phil, Lil and Angelica return to the screens, they look brand new thanks to the CG animation style. Executive producers Eryk Casemiro and Kate Boutilier (both worked on the original series) reinterpreted “Rugrats” for new and adult audiences, aiming to create a world in which Arlene Klasky’s groundbreaking animation would be appreciated, however has been updated. Gábor Csupó and Paul Germain in 1991.

“The unusual line and design style has often been described as ugly-cute, and included many forced angles from the camera to the floor-level babies’ eyes as they embarked on their adventures,” says Casemiro. “CG allowed us to give it a really fresh look and feel contemporary compared to the original 2D.”

As a result, the main characters’ assets and designs were conceived in Burbank, California before being sent to Technicolor in India for animation. This process allowed the team to achieve those extreme “rugrats” camera angles and capture the original, asymmetrical Klasky-Csupó character design. It also allowed for more animation tools and lighting. The result is a larger environment, more realistic shadows and settings, and a greater “mood” as the characters experience their unique, fantastic adventures.

The story goes on

“Because of the sophistication of the kids and the movies they saw, we wanted them to have the same experience of being right there with the babies under the table,” adds Boutilier. “The show feels very tactile. You are really in her world, with her view of the crumbs under the couch and all that. “

The EPs add that the new “Rugrats” take into account the color palette and design of the original, but the CG style also allows for more details that further build on these characters’ worlds – from the walls or furniture to the children’s clothing wear to the scratch marks on their shoes.

Plus, the creatives can take storytelling to exciting new places themselves.

“There is an episode where the babies imagine they are going into Chas’ ear because there is a song in his head and they want to get it out,” says Casemiro. “So they’re going on a journey through the body and it’s so much more, dare I say, grotesque than 2D. It’s not cute – it actually has a slightly insane quality to it that the show always had in its design style. “

Given how much the world has changed since “Rugrats” went off the air 15 years ago, it was easy for the creatives to update the stories to reflect a new generation. Instead of repeating all the stories they’d already told, they focused on how life has turned out since then. They also updated the adult characters so that the ages of the young parents are now in line with the millennial audiences who grew up with the series, creating a double viewing experience for young families.

“We slightly changed some of the adult dynamic and made more of a group of friends who are connected,” reveals Boutilier. “Although we start our stories from a baby’s point of view, adult stories can also influence or complement a story.”

“It’s safe to say that it was easier to generate stories now than it was towards the end of ‘Rugrats’,” adds Casemiro. “I remember this existential crisis like: ‘What else can you learn, we’ve done everything! ‘ back then. But the refresh was nice. It was a whole new set of circumstances, but the characters were like old friends. It was easy to imagine how these characters would face these new circumstances, since their core personalities have not changed. When we started writing it was like a hug from an old friend. “

“Rugrats” debuts May 27th on Paramount Plus and Nickelodeon.

Best of variety

Sign up for Variety’s newsletter. Follow us for the latest news on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

First spherical of the 2021 NFL Draft attracted 12.6 million viewers

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell announces Kwity Paye as the 21st selection of the Indianapolis Colts during the first round of the 2021 NFL draft at the Great Lakes Science Center in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Gregory Shamus / Getty Images)

Gregory Shamus | Getty Images Sports | Getty Images

The National Football League’s opening night for its annual draft event drew an average of 12.6 million viewers across three networks, including ESPN and ABC.

It didn’t beat last year’s all-time high of 15.5 million viewers, but it’s up 11 percent from the 2019 draft (11.4 million). Before last year, the all-time high in 2014 was 12.4 million viewers. The 2020 NFL Draft was a purely virtual event due to Covid-19.

The Jacksonville Jaguars drafted ex-Clemson quarterback Trevor Lawrence with the first overall pick of 2021, followed by the New York Jets who took BYU’s Zach Wilson. A total of five quarterbacks and 18 offensive players were selected in the first round. It’s the most since teams drafted 19 offensive players in 2009.

This year’s draft reverted to a live event format for public reasons in Cleveland. A vaccinated Roger Gooddell hugged players who were drafted, and the NFL commissioner was also accompanied by a fan on stage for each selection.

Las Vegas is selected to host the NFL draft in 2022. The draft of the event was originally scheduled in the city last April but has been canceled due to the pandemic.

Ja’Marr Chase, Trey Lance, Kyle Pitts and Rashawn Slater stand on stage ahead of the start of the first round of the 2021 NFL draft at the Great Lakes Science Center in Cleveland, Ohio.

Gregory Shamus | Getty Images Sports | Getty Images

The draft for 2021 continues on Friday with rounds two and three. The remaining rounds (four to seven) are planned for Saturday. The draft will be televised Disney Features ABC and ESPN and the league’s own NFL network.

A viewer’s information to tonight’s Oscars | Leisure

In the Oscar nominations for 2021, announced on March 15, two women were nominated for the first time in the history of the Oscar for best director. Netflix’s hit “Mank” received ten leading nominations, including “Best Picture”. Six nominations apiece went to “The Father”, “Judas and the Black Messiah”, “Minari”, “Nomadland”, “Sound of Metal” and “The Trial of the Chicago 7”.

Regardless of which films or individuals win a prestigious Oscar, there is inevitable disagreement between observing critics and viewers of the annual Academy Awards on television. Art is inherently subjective and cinema is no exception. Since films are a very popular and lucrative art form, public control over important awards is intensifying. With the 93rd Academy Awards on April 25, 2021 Forklift revisits some of the most controversial Oscar wins in the history of these awards shows.

The most common source of controversy about Oscar winners is that viewers believe there was better competition this year. While the Oscars can be criticized as predictable by viewers, some award winners have created issues that cast doubt on the academy’s voting process. Awards season campaigns have been rampant over the past few decades, leading the cynic to believe that the Oscars are awarded based on behind-the-scenes producers’ handshakes rather than objective quality.

In other cases, personal factors can weigh on observer discomfort with Oscar wins. These factors can be turbulent production drama, misdeeds by actors or filmmakers, or controversial public statements. These Oscar wins have sparked discussions about the separation of artist and art and debates about how Oscar winners are selected. Issues of diversity, sexual behavior and standards for filmmaking are among the most discussed issues.

Sometimes an Oscar win cannot be considered controversial in its day, but can be viewed as questionable in retrospect. Some films age less well with audiences due to changing social norms in the present compared to other cultural standards in the past. In other cases, the misconduct of individuals involved in these films has since been exposed or has re-emerged after such a victory.

Read on to find out more about some of the most critically criticized Oscar wins and their ages.

You may also like … VMAs: The Most Popular Music Videos of 2019

Examine: Tween TV viewers get new message about worth of fame | Leisure

Adolescents approaching puberty are also particularly vulnerable to media influences, as they “dream of their future by shaping their value systems,” the study says. The researchers used Nielsen ratings to determine the leading tween shows and then asked study participants about the values ​​of the TV characters.

Viewers perceived different messages depending on whether they were watching a reality series or a script series. The previous study, published in 2011, was done on the verge of the reality TV boom and only included scripts.

The new study found that the comedies “Girl Meets World” and “The Thundermans” appeared to be shifting away from the emphasis on fame, but the competitive series “American Ninja Warrior” and “America’s Got Talent” continued to reflect this trend “Self-Focused Values” from 2007.

“When tweens watch, admire and identify with people who care about fame and gain most, those values ​​can become even more important in our culture,” the report’s lead author Agnes Varghese said in a statement.

In previous years, the study found that community spirit, benevolence and tradition were emphasized in hit series like “The Andy Griffith Show” from 1967. “Happy Days”, 1977; “Growing Pains” (1987) and “Sabrina the Teenage Witch” (1997).

The community ranked first three of those years, dropping once to number 2. Then the fame that remained at the bottom of the list soared to first place in 2007, with researchers shifting to the adoption of social media platforms like Facebook and returned Youtube.