GE suspends Covid vaccine, take a look at guidelines after excessive courtroom nixes Biden mandate

An employee helps install a traction motor on the truck of a General Electric Evolution Series Tier 4 diesel locomotive at the GE Manufacturing Solutions facility in Fort Worth, Texas.

Luke Sharret | Bloomberg | Getty Images

General Electric suspended its Covid vaccine and testing requirements on Friday after the Supreme Court blocked the Biden administration’s mandate, a company spokesman told CNBC.

GE, which had 174,000 employees at the end of 2020, has encouraged its employees to get vaccinated, the spokesman said.

The conservative majority of the Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision, called the Biden administration’s requirements a “blunt instrument” that “makes no distinctions by industry or risk of exposure to Covid-19.”

In a statement following the court decision, President Joe Biden urged companies to voluntarily implement the vaccination and testing rules.

“The court has ruled that my administration cannot use the authority granted to it by Congress to require this action,” Biden said. “But that doesn’t stop me from using my voice as president to advocate for employers to do the right thing to protect the health and economy of Americans.”

Labor Secretary Marty Walsh has vowed to use the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s existing power to hold companies accountable for protecting workers from Covid.

“We urge all employers to require workers to be vaccinated or tested weekly to most effectively combat this deadly virus in the workplace,” Walsh said in a statement Thursday. “Employers are responsible for the safety of their workers in the workplace.”

The American Medical Association, one of the largest medical associations in the US, contradicted that the Supreme Court blocked “one of the most effective tools in the fight against further transmission and death from this aggressive virus”.

“Workplace transmission has been an important factor in the spread of Covid-19,” said AMA President Dr. Gerald Harmon. “More than ever, workers in all settings across the country need sound, evidence-based protection from Covid-19 infection, hospitalization and death.”

Harmon urged companies to protect their workers from the disease. A number of large companies – including Citigroup, Nike and Columbia Sportswear – have announced plans to lay off unvaccinated workers.

The Covid-Omicron variant is driving new infections to unprecedented levels. The US is reporting an average of more than 786,000 new infections each day, a 29% increase from the previous week, according to a CNBC analysis of data from Johns Hopkins University.

Additionally, based on federal data going back to the summer of 2020, hospitalizations are at a pandemic high. About 151,000 Americans were in hospitals with Covid as of Friday, a seven-day moving average of health and social services data shows, up 23%. from a week earlier. That number includes both patients who have been admitted to hospital due to Covid and those who have tested positive after admission.

— CNBC’s Nate Rattner contributed to this report

Burger King to check Not possible Meals’ meatless nuggets

Burger King’s Impossible Nuggets

Burger King

Burger King will be testing Impossible Foods’ meatless nuggets in multiple markets, making it the first fast food chain to offer the company’s new chicken alternative.

Starting Monday, customers in Des Moines, Iowa, Boston and Miami can try the plant-based Impossible Nuggets.

the International restaurant brands Chain first partnered with Impossible Foods two years ago as the first fast food chain to sell their meatless burgers. After an initial increase in sales of the busy item, the chain lowered the price and got closer to a beef whopper. The rival of Burger King MC Donalds has a partnership with Impossible’s main challenger Beyond meat, although they haven’t yet launched a herbal item nationwide in the U.S.

For Burger King, the Impossible Nuggets offer a similar option as the Impossible Whopper to direct traffic to its restaurants. While meat alternatives are now more commonly found on fast food menus, chicken substitutes are a rare find as both Impossible and Beyond only recently launched their iterations. Impossible began by introducing its meatless nuggets in restaurants and grocery stores in September, while Beyond’s tenders hit restaurants in July.

The test comes because traditional chicken is more expensive and harder to find. Chicken commodity prices have doubled this year, according to Bank of America Securities. Yum Brands’ KFC stopped advertising its chicken offerings last month due to a delivery bottleneck.

Burger King also announced on Wednesday that it will introduce Ghost Pepper Chicken Nuggets nationwide on Monday. Unlike the Impossible Nuggets, these are made from white chicken.

Restaurant Brands’ shares are up less than 1% this year, for a market value of $ 28.5 billion.

Boks’ model on trial in 100th check towards the All Blacks

The All Blacks and Springboks will meet for the 100th time on Saturday for a test that could decide this year’s rugby championship, but which some observers see as a battle for the soul of rugby.

The game in Townsville in the north of the state of Queensland in Australia offers a strong stylistic contrast between the free-flowing, fast-paced style of the All Blacks, which relies on skill and possession, and the less adventurous game of the Springboks, which focuses on kicking and being assertive Forward play.

There is no doubt which style rugby fans like the most. Leading analysts and former coaches from around the world almost unanimously criticize the style of the Springboks, which they fear will put off rugby audiences.

Two-time All Blacks world champion coach Steve Hansen said during the series between the Springboks and the British and Irish Lions this season, “It’s not a game anyone wants to watch.”

In a column in the English Daily Mail, 2003 world champion coach Clive Woodward – never a fan of the All Blacks – applauded New Zealand for playing “real rugby”.

Commenting on South Africa’s successive defeats to Australia over the past two weekends, Woodward commented: “Last weekend I was horrified to see the sheer poverty and boredom of the South African team against Australia. Rugby shouldn’t be played that way – and it isn’t – and I’m just happy that Australia won.

“The Boks v Lions streak was little better and it should worry anyone involved in the sport that rugby is going down this path. It will be dead in five years if it does. “

The springboks defy this criticism, arguing that the end justifies the means. South Africa is the current world champion and the top ranked team in world rugby. Though the series against the Lions is considered one of the least exciting major series in recent years – between two undemanding teams – the Springboks say the win justifies their chosen style.

Flyhalf Handre Pollard made this argument when the Springboks defeated Argentina twice in rugby championship matches in South Africa.

“Everyone has their own way of playing rugby which they think is the way to go,” said Pollard. “We’re not about entertainment. The rugby test match is about winning. “

Springboks assistant coach Mzwandile Stick, who was responsible for the team’s second leg, set up a more colorful defense.

“We’re the # 1 team in the world right now, we’re world champions right now, so people keep talking about us,” said Stick. “Even if it’s positive or negative. . . it is in the nature of the position we are in. “

Where South Africa is headed now, after the two defeats to the Wallabies suggest that their strategy is not always a winning strategy, will be seen on Saturday. Against opponents who can not only defuse the high ball but also turn it against themselves, the Springboks have to have less confidence in their kick game.

South Africa coach Jacques Nienaber says that the defeats against Australia are not due to the game plan, but to the poor performance of the Boks. The game on Saturday could put the strategy to the test again.

All Blacks trainer Ian Foster expects the Springboks to be well prepared and focused on properly executing the plan.

“We have no doubt that South Africa has had a plan for this game for a long time,” said Foster. “What we have learned is not to be amazed at the intensity of the opponent’s build-up and not to lull yourself into a feeling of the past two weeks and his previous form, believing that this will be an indicator of what is on Saturday happens, “he said.

___

More AP sports: https://apnews.com/apf-sports and https://twitter.com/AP_Sports

Is it protected to fly now? One preflight PCR take a look at might be the reply

A study conducted earlier this year shows that there may be a way to reduce the number of Covid infections on board commercial aircraft to practically zero.

Results of the study appeared in a Peer-reviewed articles published September 1 in the medical journal Mayo Clinic Proceedings. The article – a joint effort by the Mayo Clinic, the Georgia Department of Public Health, and Delta Air Lines – showed that a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test performed within 72 hours of the flight reduced the rate of infected travelers on board to 0.05 % decreased. That’s five people for every 10,000 passengers.

At the time of the study, the infection rate in the US was 1.1% – or about 1 in 100 people.

“A damn low number”

The results analyzed data from Delta’s preflight testing program which ran from December 2020 to May 2021.

This is how Delta’s test program worked: Passengers on selected flights from New York City and Atlanta could fly to Italy without quarantine if they were tested negative for Covid-19 via a PCR test before departure and within 72 hours before the flight a rapid antigen test on landing.

Data from Delta’s preflight testing program provides new information on test feasibility, test accuracy and infection rates among passengers on commercial flights.

Mario Tama | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Of the 9,853 people who tested negative using the PCR test, four tested positive using rapid antigen tests at the airport. The diagnoses were confirmed by a rapid molecular test and these people were not allowed to fly.

Of the passengers who flew to Italy, one tested positive upon landing.

That equates to one case detection per 1,970 travelers “during a period of high prevalence of active infections in the United States,” the article said.

“That’s a hell of a low number,” said Dr. Aaron J. Tande, the lead author of the article and an infectious disease specialist at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

The study suggests that a PCR test within three days of the flight makes subsequent tests at the airport largely superfluous, especially in combination with mask requirements on board and increasing vaccination rates for passengers.

‘Limits of the Study

The journal article mentions several “limitations” that may have affected the study’s findings, including the role of preflight testing in travel behavior. Participants suspected of having a Covid infection may have decided not to travel. Others may have been more careful wearing masks and self-isolating knowing they had to test negative to fly, Tande said.

“I can’t say that made the number of positive tests that low – or really did it make the 72-hour test that good,” he told CNBC. “But … the bottom line is that it’s a safe flight for people, and that’s what we want.”

If you were to repeat the study now … I think you would see a significant decrease in the rate of infection on board. “

DR. Aaron J. Tande

Mayo Clinic

Tande said the results are based on the Covid-19 strains that were circulating in the United States in the first half of 2021, rather than the more contagious Delta variant that is now dominating.

“I don’t think you could say you would get the exact same result by repeating the study now – with a different infection rate in the community and a different virus,” he told CNBC. “I think you would see a significant drop in the rate of infection on board.”

Safer but less workable options

The pilot took into account five testing strategies, two of which may have detected even more infected flyers.

For example, a single rapid molecular test at the airport could have found more infections because it minimizes the time between test and flight and so could capture infections that occur during that time. Adding a 72 hour PCR preflight test would likely find even more, according to the study.

Although airports weren’t designed for large-scale medical testing, many have set up makeshift facilities over the past year, like the Rome Fiumicino International Airport shown here.

Alessia Pierdomenico | Bloomberg | Getty Images

However, a preflight PCR test is the “better approach” because it is more feasible, said Tande. PCR tests are widespread, “more sensitive” – ​​which means they can better detect positive cases – and they are taking test logistics away from airports, he said. Preliminary tests also give infected travelers time to reorganize their plans rather than surprise them just before departure.

Test flights or vaccinated flights?

Preflight PCR testing can make flying safer, but most passengers now fly without one. And the airlines are silent when it comes to signing them in the future.

However, tests could become the de facto rule on international flights if the countries of arrival require them for passengers to enter. A Delta Air Lines spokesman declined to say whether it would require testing for its passengers, but said that “each country’s government is responsible for setting its own requirements”.

Tande said he would feel safer on a flight that required passengers to pass PCR tests before the flight. However, if given the choice, he said he preferred one more vaccination flight.

“I would definitely take the vaccinated flight – and (I would) mask,” he said.

Qantas CEO Alan Joyce said last week that passengers need to be vaccinated on their international flights. according to news.com.au. US officials are currently debating whether to make vaccinations mandatory at home and abroad, as of this week. reported The Washington Post.

“Unfortunately, Covid will be with us for a long time due to the discontinuation of vaccinations,” said Tande. “By continuously masking and testing before flying … we can improve safety so that we can continue to function as a normal society.”

Michio Kaku calls nuclear fusion check at nationwide lab ‘large step towards the holy grail of power analysis’

Theoretical physicist Michio Kaku praised a recent nuclear fusion experiment at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

“This is a huge step towards the holy grail of energy research,” said Kaku, professor of theoretical physics at City College and the City University of New York. “To break even, to gain more energy than you invest, and that could end up being a game changer.”

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory announced a major achievement in nuclear fusion, the it had back on August 8th, was able to use 1.3 megajoules of energy at its National ignition system, albeit very briefly. Kaku told CNBCs “The news with Shepard Smith“that the achievement was a huge step towards clean energy.

“A fusion reactor is carbon neutral, it does not produce carbon dioxide, it does not produce large amounts of nuclear waste, which is found in nuclear fission plants with uranium, it does not melt,” said the author of “The God Equation: The Search for a Theory of Everything.” “The fuel is sea water, hydrogen from sea water could be the base fuel.”

merger, the lesser known and opposite reaction to fission, is when two atoms collide to form a heavier atom and release energy. This is how the sun generates energy.

Kaku explained some of the disadvantages of nuclear fusion and why it is not currently an easily accessible source of energy.

“It turns out that when you heat hydrogen to tens of millions of degrees Fahrenheit, the temperature of the sun, things get unstable, and so this reaction took place for over a hundred trillionth of a second, just a snap of your fingers, so in other words, us want to have a continuous flow of energy, not bursts of energy like we found here, “said Kaku.

Two visitors aboard Royal Caribbean cruise take a look at optimistic for Covid

Two guests on board Royal Caribbean Cruises‘The Adventure of the Seas ship has tested positive for Covid-19 in routine tests and is now returning home, the company said on Thursday.

That comes after Two guests on Royal Caribbean’s Celebrity Millennium Cruise tested positive and the company Odyssey of the Seas was delayed from sailing after eight members of its crew tested positive.

Both guests were unvaccinated and under 16 years old. One guest is asymptomatic and the other has mild symptoms.

Other guests traveling with the two minors and guests who have come into close contact with them have all been vaccinated and tested negative, according to the company.

The guests and fellow travelers disembarked in the Bahamas and are on their way home to Florida.

According to Royal Caribbean, 92% of guests on the Adventures of the Seas ship are fully vaccinated, and the remaining 8% of guests are under 16 years of age. All crew members are fully vaccinated.

The CDC allowed cruises to return this year with strict safety protocols and requirements to prevent outbreaks from occurring on board several outbreaks on board ships in the past year.

The cruise industry is among the last to return to pre-pandemic surgery due to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s strict guidelines.

Cruise ship stocks have fallen again after taking a major blow during the pandemic.

Royal Caribbean Cruises line stocks are up more than 16% this year, hitting a market cap of just over $ 22 billion.

SpaceX lands Starship rocket SN15 after take a look at flight

Elon Musk’s SpaceX launched and landed the latest prototype of its Starship rocket on Wednesday’s fifth test flight of the system at high altitude.

The spaceship prototype rocket Serial Number 15 or SN15 launched and flew up to 10 kilometers or about 33,000 feet in altitude. It is constructed of stainless steel and represents the early version of the rocket that Musk unveiled in 2019.

“Spaceship is nominally landing!” Musk tweeted after landing. Nominal is a space industry term used to denote when things go according to plan.

SN15 was the first Starship prototype that SpaceX did not destroy after a test flight at high altitude. While a small fire broke out at the base of the rocket after landing, the fire appeared to be contained a few minutes later.

The company is developing Starship to bring cargo and people on missions to the moon and Mars.

Earlier this month NASA has awarded SpaceX nearly $ 3 billion Contract to build a moon variant of Starship to bring astronauts to the surface of the moon for the agency’s Artemis missions. While Musk’s company continues to develop Starship, NASA has stopped SpaceX work on the HLS program thereafter Jeff Bezos’ Blue origin and Read‘Daughter of Dynetics each filed protests against the NASA contract award.

The SN15 flight was similar to what SpaceX has conducted over the past six months with the test flights of the prototypes SN8, SN9, SN10 and SN11. While each of the previous missiles was successfully launched and several development goals were met, all four prototypes were explosively destroyed – SN8 and SN9 on impact during landing attempts. SN10 a few minutes after landingand SN11 shortly before the attempt to land.

The Starship prototypes are about 150 feet tall, or about the size of a 15-story building, and are each powered by three Raptor rocket engines.

The Starship prototype SN15 rocket is on the company’s launch pad in Boca Chica, Texas.

SpaceX

SpaceX noted in a statement on its website that the SN15 has “vehicle enhancements in terms of structure, avionics and software” compared to previous Starship prototypes.

“Specifically, a new, improved avionics suite, an updated fuel architecture in the tail skirt, and a new design and configuration for Raptor engines,” said SpaceX.

The Federal Aviation Administration, which has an inspector at the SpaceX facilities to monitor the test flights, conducted a “breakdown” investigation of the SN11 flight.

Last week, the FAA announced the approval of the next three Starship launches – SN15, SN16, and SN16 – and said it would “verify that SpaceX has implemented corrective actions resulting from the SN11 breakdown investigation”.

The FAA approved multiple launches “because SpaceX makes few changes to the launcher and relies on the FAA-approved method to calculate the risk to the public.”

30 years on, Myanmar disaster places Asian-style democracy to check

BANGKOK – The leaders of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations met in Jakarta on April 24 to discuss the aftermath of the coup in Myanmar. After the meeting, Brunei gave one Declaration by the chairmanThe heads of state and government had reached a “consensus” on issues such as the immediate cessation of violence in Myanmar, the dispatch of the ASEAN chairman’s special envoy and the start of a constructive dialogue between all concerned in order to find a peaceful solution in the interests of the people .

The meeting of heads of state and government was exceptional in every way.

ASEAN has a policy of non-interference in the internal affairs of other members. This was the first time the group had called a meeting of leaders on an internal issue in a member state. It was also the first to be held in a country other than the Chairman’s. Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the block has held online sessions that take place almost 1,000 times a year. This was the first face-to-face ministerial meeting since the Foreign Ministers’ meeting with China in Laos last February.

It was also surprising that Myanmar’s junta leader Min Aung Hlaing was present. It is believed that he was present as the head of the State Administrative Council, the official name of the junta that took power after the February 1 coup, rather than as the Colonel General of the Myanmar military. But during the previous military rule, the prime minister attended the summits, not Than Shwe, the then chairman of the state peace and development council. If normal diplomatic protocol had been followed this time, it would have been appropriate for Myanmar to send former Vice President Myint Swe, who was appointed incumbent president by the junta.

The decision to invite Min Aung Hlaing drew the ire of critics, who said the move was to give the junta tacit approval. However, ASEAN called the latest Konfab a “meeting of heads of state and government” rather than a summit, to indicate that, according to diplomatic sources, Min Aung Hlaing is not recognized as the head of state of Myanmar.

Mynmar’s junta head Major General Min Aung Hlaing (left) gestures as he is greeted at Soekarno Hatta International Airport on the outskirts of Jakarta on April 24. © Reuters

The unusual gathering was held to urge Myanmar’s military chief to end the crackdown on pro-democracy protesters that has killed more than 750 civilians, according to the Political Prisoners Support Group, an advocacy group. ASEAN came under heavy pressure from the international community during the meeting and the discussions must have been heated, unlike the usual carefully choreographed ASEAN summits.

Following the coup, Indonesia hosted an online meeting of ASEAN foreign ministers on March 2. Members appealed to Wunna Maung Lwin, Myanmar’s foreign minister appointed by the junta, to exercise restraint, but the junta’s action escalated instead.

Then Indonesia moved again. On March 19, President Joko Widodo Brunei called on Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah to convene a meeting of heads of state and government, and Malaysian Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin and his Singaporean counterpart Lee Hsien Loong spoke out quickly. The meeting would not have taken place without the support of these three countries.

Indonesia’s activism is believed to have been driven by the situation in Myanmar when the ASEAN foreign ministers’ meeting was held in March, and this may also have been the case at the most recent meeting. Just before a conference call with Sultan Bolkiah, Jokowi posted a video on YouTube saying he would propose a meeting of heads of state and government in Brunei. The message was that the Indonesian President wanted to play a leading role in solving the Myanmar crisis.

Persecution of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar has been a concern of Indonesians, 90% of whom are Muslim. “As a leader with excellent political balance, Jokowi found it beneficial to get involved in Myanmar, given the state of national public opinion and Indonesia’s status as the leader of ASEAN,” said Takashi Shiraishi, Chancellor of Kumamoto Prefectural University.

Malaysia, where Islam is the official religion, and Singapore, which emphasizes multiracial unity and has the greatest economic interest in Myanmar, had similar political interests in containing the unrest in Myanmar.

These three countries were active in Myanmar for 10 years until Myanmar joined ASEAN in 1997 and their attitudes towards the country remained unchanged.

Europe and the US have in the past strongly condemned Myanmar’s former junta, which in 1988 house arrest the leader of democracy and later the de facto leader of Myanmar, Aung San Suu Kyi, after smashing demonstrations for democracy. The junta also ignored the Suu Kyi camp’s landslide victory in the 1990 parliamentary elections. But the three ASEAN members defended Myanmar, among others.

The trio was facing its own challenges at the time. They passed “development dictatorships” in which economic growth took precedence over political freedom. And they advocated an “Asian style democracy” in which social stability is more in the foreground than individual freedom. As related governments, they wanted to help Myanmar fend off criticism of censorship and actions against democratic opponents.

However, the three also had “constructive engagement” and urged the junta to free Suu Kyi from her first house arrest in 1995, when talks with Myanmar about ASEAN membership were in their final stages.

This time the three nations sought concessions in Myanmar rather than defending it, probably because of changes in their homeland. Indonesia became democratic in Asia after the financial crisis and Suharto’s authoritarian regime collapsed in 1998. Malaysia saw its first democratic change of government in 2018, while Singapore, which has been led by the ruling People’s Action Party since its independence, has grown in opposition, a political force in recent years.

The leaders of the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations will meet on April 24 in the organization’s secretariat building in Jakarta. © Reuters

The shift in attitudes towards the junta in Myanmar reflects the progress made towards democratization in the three countries that have become more sensitive to public opinion.

However, the opposite trend can be observed in Thailand and the Philippines, where only foreign ministers were sent to the last meeting. The Philippines and Thailand, which became democratic in 1986 and 1988, respectively, took a cool stance on Myanmar’s junta at the time. However, both countries are reluctant to take a stand that Myanmar itself is ruled by strong men.

Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, who led the 2014 coup that brought him to power, and Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, whose extrajudicial killings of alleged drug crimes are under pressure in Europe and the US

It looks like the ASEAN leaders’ meeting could win some concessions from Myanmar’s junta, but it remains unclear whether the generals will keep their word. The Singapore Prime Minister said Myanmar had not refused to send a special envoy, but Min Aung Hlaing may have rejected rather than accepted the proposal. It is also unclear when and how the junta will implement the agreement.

If Myanmar doesn’t stop the end of the deal and ASEAN doesn’t do anything about it, trust in ASEAN at home and abroad could decline. In the 1990s, the prospect of ASEAN admission was a negotiating chip the group held to persuade the previous junta to moderate its behavior. Is the group really ready to consider expelling Myanmar this time? The recent extraordinary meeting could shed some light on whether ASEAN is ready to take this momentous step.

Take a look at your Oscar genius with this trivia problem | Arts & Leisure

In the weirdest awards season ever, the Oscars are only a week away. Here are some trivia to help you impress your vaccinated guests at your Oscar watch party. Pay attention to the questions; There may be clues in it.

1. Who has the most career nominations among black actresses? It would be foolish to try to fence them in.

2. Which two of this year’s best picture nominees appear at the same time and even relate to each other’s events?

3. Who holds the record for the most Oscar nominations a woman has received in a year? After that, she may find a home in the academy.

4. Two women are nominated as directors (Emerald Fennell for “Promising Young Woman” and Chloe Zhao for “Nomadland”), most of them in one year. In 92 years earlier, only five more women were nominated. Can you name more than one? Tip: You won, so you didn’t need a special place to relieve the pain of losing.

5. What is the only X-rated film that wins the best picture? Don’t yell all at once; I don’t want everyone to talk to me.

6. The pandemic made the 2020 box office numbers all but irrelevant, but only twice in the last 50 years has the world’s biggest winner won the best picture. Name one of the winners. Bonus: Two animated films were the top greats of their year during this period and won the animated film Oscar. If you can name one, don’t hold him back anymore.

7. Billie Eilish’s James Bond film theme, “No Time to Die,” became the first Grammy-winning visual media song from an unreleased film. Two Bond themes have won an Oscar. Do you even have a chance to name it? The first was not sung by Chicken Little.

8. There are two cases where two actors won Oscars for playing the same role (in different films). What two character roles earned Oscars for four different actors? Nobody will laugh if you don’t understand.

9. According to Martin Scorsese and a few others, superhero films are “not cinema”. That must have come as a terrible shock to the three Academy Award nominees who directed Marvel Cinematic Universe films. The MCU debut is scheduled for November. Who are you?

And finally, if you get this without Googling the answer, things really go your way:

10. LaKeith Stanfield’s nomination that year for supporting actor in “Jude and the Black Messiah” raised old questions about how voters decide which performances to make or support. Decades ago an actor was nominated in both the minor and main categories in the same year – for the same performance. WHO? What the? How?

REPLY

1. Viola Davis received her fourth this year for “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom”. She won for “Fences”.

2. “Jude and the Black Messiah” and “The Trial of Chicago 7.”

3. Chloe Zhao, with four for “Nomadland” – for adapted script, best picture (she is a producer), director and editor.

4. Kathryn Bigelow (“The Hurt Locker” – the only winner so far), Jane Campion (“The Piano”), Sofia Coppola (“Lost in Translation”), Greta Gerwig (“Lady Bird”) and Lina Wertmuller (“Seven Beauties ”).

5. “Midnight Cowboy” (1969); it has since been re-rated by R.

6. “Titanic” and “The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King”. Bonus: “Toy Story 3” and “Frozen”.

7. “Skyfall” (Adele) and “Writing’s on the Wall” (Sam Smith, from “Specter”).

8. Vito Corleone (Marlon Brando in “The Godfather” and Robert De Niro in “The Godfather Part II”) and the Joker (Heath Ledger in “The Dark Knight” and Joaquin Phoenix in “Joker”).

9. Kenneth Branagh (“Thor”) has four nominations. Taika Waititi (“Thor: Ragnarok”) is a winner of the writing. Chloe Zhao (the upcoming “Eternals”) has four nominations for “Nomad Land”.

10. Barry Fitzgerald for “Going My Way” (1944). The academy later changed its rules so that a performance could only be nominated in one of the acting categories.

Guests tiptoe by the tulips in Dutch virus take a look at | Leisure




In the world-famous Keukenhof garden in Lisse, Netherlands, Friday, April 9, 2021, there are far fewer visitors than usual. After a month after the dreary month of lockdown, there are glimmers of hope in spring for a relaxation of coronavirus restrictions in a Dutch flower garden and other public venues. Keukenhof, nestled in the pancake fields between Amsterdam and The Hague, opened its doors on Friday to a happy 5,000 people who were only admitted if they could prove on a smartphone app that they had just tested negative for COVID-19.




In the world-famous Keukenhof garden in Lisse, Netherlands, Friday, April 9, 2021, there are far fewer visitors than usual. After a month after the dreary month of lockdown, there are glimmers of hope in spring for a relaxation of coronavirus restrictions in a Dutch flower garden and other public venues. Keukenhof, nestled in the pancake fields between Amsterdam and The Hague, opened its doors on Friday to a happy 5,000 people who were only admitted if they could prove on a smartphone app that they had just tested negative for COVID-19.




Visitors tiptoe through the tulips in the Dutch virus test

In the world-famous Keukenhof garden in Lisse, Netherlands, Friday, April 9, 2021, there are far fewer visitors than usual. After a month after the dreary month of lockdown, there are glimmers of hope in spring for a relaxation of coronavirus restrictions in a Dutch flower garden and other public venues. Keukenhof, nestled in the pancake fields between Amsterdam and The Hague, opened its doors on Friday to a happy 5,000 people who were only admitted if they could prove on a smartphone app that they had just tested negative for COVID-19.




Visitors tiptoe through the tulips in the Dutch virus test

In the world-famous Keukenhof garden in Lisse, Netherlands, Friday, April 9, 2021, there are far fewer visitors than usual. After a month after the dreary month of lockdown, there are glimmers of hope in spring for a relaxation of coronavirus restrictions in a Dutch flower garden and other public venues. Keukenhof, nestled in the pancake fields between Amsterdam and The Hague, opened its doors on Friday to a happy 5,000 people who were only admitted if they could prove on a smartphone app that they had just tested negative for COVID-19.




Visitors tiptoe through the tulips in the Dutch virus test

In the world-famous Keukenhof garden in Lisse, Netherlands, Friday, April 9, 2021, there are far fewer visitors than usual. After a month after the dreary month of lockdown, there are glimmers of hope in spring for a relaxation of coronavirus restrictions in a Dutch flower garden and other public venues. Keukenhof, nestled in the pancake fields between Amsterdam and The Hague, opened its doors on Friday to a happy 5,000 people who were only admitted if they could prove on a smartphone app that they had just tested negative for COVID-19.




Visitors tiptoe through the tulips in the Dutch virus test

In the world-famous Keukenhof garden in Lisse, Netherlands, Friday, April 9, 2021, there are far fewer visitors than usual. After a month after the dreary month of lockdown, there are glimmers of hope in spring for a relaxation of coronavirus restrictions in a Dutch flower garden and other public venues. Keukenhof, nestled in the pancake fields between Amsterdam and The Hague, opened its doors on Friday to a happy 5,000 people who were only admitted if they could prove on a smartphone app that they had just tested negative for COVID-19.




Visitors tiptoe through the tulips in the Dutch virus test

Two women take photos because there are far fewer visitors than usual in the world-famous Keukenhof garden in Lisse, the Netherlands, on Friday, April 9, 2021. Finally, after a month after the dreary month of lockdown, shots of hope emerge in the spring of easing coronavirus restrictions in a Dutch flower garden and other public facilities. Keukenhof, nestled in the pancake fields between Amsterdam and The Hague, opened its doors on Friday to a happy 5,000 people who were only admitted if they could prove on a smartphone app that they had just tested negative for COVID-19.




Visitors tiptoe through the tulips in the Dutch virus test

A couple with face masks took their photos in the world-famous Keukenhof garden in Lisse, the Netherlands, on Friday, April 9th, 2021. After a month after the dreary month of lockdown, there are glimmers of hope in spring for a relaxation of coronavirus restrictions in a Dutch flower garden and other public venues. Keukenhof, nestled in the pancake fields between Amsterdam and The Hague, opened its doors on Friday to a happy 5,000 people who were only admitted if they could prove on a smartphone app that they had just tested negative for COVID-19.

From MIKE CORDER Associated Press

LISSE, Netherlands (AP) – After the bleak winter months of a coronavirus lockdown, spring hopes erupted on Friday as restrictions were eased at a Dutch flower garden and other public facilities.

As part of a government-approved pilot project, the world-famous Keukenhof Gardens opened its gates to let a few thousand people tiptoe through the 7 million tulips, hyacinths, daffodils and myriad other flowers carefully tipped by a small army of people manicured lawns were planted by gardeners.

A maximum of 5,000 visitors were allowed to enter the garden in the middle of the pancake fields between Amsterdam and The Hague if they could prove that they had just tested negative for COVID-19.

Minke Kleinen, who visited downtown Arnhem with her friend Ilse van Egten, said it felt like her “first legal day”. The friends took quick tests before leaving and received their negative results by email as they drove.

“It feels strange that we can stand next to each other,” said Van Egten and hugged the little ones briefly. “It is nice!”

Keukenhof lost an entire season to the pandemic last year when the first deadly wave of infections swept across the Netherlands. The planned opening on March 20 this year never took place due to the country’s strict virus lockdown.