Breanna Stewart and Marta Xargay Casademont Share Cash Talks

If you shop through our links, Insider can earn an affiliate commission. Learn more.

It’s been quite a summer for WNBA star Breanna Stewart. The Seattle Storm power forward helped bring the U.S. women’s basketball team to life Gold at the Tokyo Olympics, and days later greeted daughter Ruby Mae Stewart Xargay via surrogacy with her wife Marta Xargay Casademont. Stewart also led the storm to the first WNBA Cup of Commissioners Title and won the tournament’s most valuable player award.

All of this follows on from winning her second WNBA championship in 2020, where she was named MVP in the finals.

Stewart and Xargay Casademont, a retired professional basketball player for the Phoenix Mercury and their home country Spain at the 2016 Olympics, got married in an intimate ceremony this summer, July 6th. The two are still planning a bigger celebration for family and friends.

Establish common finances

Marriage and starting a family require financial planning, and according to Stewart, the couple entered the sometimes sensitive financial talk very early in the relationship before it got serious.

“We both had very successful basketball careers and had made a lot of money with commercials abroad. And before we talked about money together, we talked separately about what we do with our money, ”she told Insider. “Marta has three investment properties in Girona, Spain. I invest a lot in the stock market and stuff like that. And then, as our relationship got more serious, we thought, ‘Okay, how are we going to do? How are we going to find out?'”

they decided Establishment of a joint account. “So there is money shared,” Stewart explained, “and then there are our separate things, which are separate investments that we made before we started our relationship.”

They had different approaches to money, but talking openly made all the difference

Managing their finances is a team effort, but Xargay Casademont admits to being a little more cautious with their expenses, especially as a former gamer who knows money isn’t infinite. It’s a complete change in mindset from their playing time.

“I feel we have to be smart about it, know what we’re doing with this money, and keep this money in a safe place,” she said. “Of course you learn from it. We are not the same people [compared to] when we started getting the money. Now that I’m retired, I’m a little different from the start and I know the money doesn’t always come. “

Stewart and Xargay Casademont have partnered with Ally Bank to help them along their financial path and to encourage other couples to be financially open with each other. When using the new. of the financial services company Financial Vow Generator and Financially open boot camp, the couple was able to identify their money personalities. Stewart is a financier with a penchant for investing and Xargay Casademont is, unsurprisingly, a super saver.

“I wasn’t like that years ago,” she laughed. “But like I said, I’m retired and things are changing.”

Why the ‘money talk’ is so important

Your healthy attitude towards frank monetary discussions is refreshing and necessary. A opinion poll The “Talking Money” study conducted by Ally Bank showed that 90% of respondents say it’s important to be open about finances, but almost half don’t do it effectively. Of those who would have liked to know more about their partner before they commit, nearly two-thirds would like to know more about their partner’s spending habits, and 39% would like to know more about their partner’s debts. Stewart said these discussions don’t have to be stressful.

“We made icebreakers to make it a bit more pleasant to talk about and have some fun. But it should be something we can talk about openly and honestly. And even being with someone is bad with Money, or good with money, maybe it’s something you can keep getting better at and your partner can help you get better. So it can’t hurt to be open and honest. ”

How to manage their money after marriage and their baby

Throughout their relationship, Xargay Casademont said they were relatively on the same page when it came to money. They’d rather go on a nice vacation than go shopping for clothes, for example. But there are moments when compromises are required. Most recently, the two argued about buying a refrigerator for their newly converted condominium.

“You can’t have a brand new kitchen or an old refrigerator,” Stewart said matter-of-factly. “You can’t have stainless steel appliances and you can’t have a stainless steel refrigerator.”

“I mean, if you make it look like this, I agree, but if it says the price, I don’t think so,” countered Xargay Casademont.

However, you are in step with the financial future of your daughter and the Lessons that they want to pass on to them. Teaching Ruby how to save is top priority. They also plan on opening a savings account that they won’t be able to access until they are 18.

“This is what my family did for me and my brother,” said Stewart. “I think it is wise to make your children aware of money and to realize that money is not unlimited and that not everything is free.”

In the meantime, the two are focused on navigating life with a newborn, ending the current WNBA season, and their upcoming wedding. To make their dream wedding come true, they work with a planner – and a budget.

“We just want to have a great day with people, make them happy and have a great day with us,” said Xargay Casademont. “We know it’s expensive, but once in a lifetime.”

“Marta already knows I want a donut wall,” added Stewart. “And we need all the things because as she said, one day you have to really celebrate us and our love and we want to make sure that it is special for us and also for the people who are special in our lives. “

Nasha is a contributing writer for INSIDER. Originally from St. Lucia, she has written for publications in the United States and the Caribbean on travel, fitness, wellness, entertainment, and relationships. Nasha is also a sports junkie who has worked for the United States Tennis Association, the Detroit Tigers, and Major League Soccer. She has a BA in Mass Communication from Grambling State University and an MS in Strategic Communication from Texas Christian University. When she’s not writing, she spends her free time digging for the Yankees, watching Friends replay, and dying on the hill of Salad Is Not Food.
Find out more about how our team of experts tests and rates products at Insider.

Read more Read less

Boris Johnson will not be a real conservative within the type of both One Nation Tory Benjamin Disraeli or Margaret Thatcher – Alastair Stewart

Boris Johnson wears a blue rosette, but is not a true conservative (Image: Matt Cardy / Getty Images)

He is determined that the party’s politicians are evil and that its members are grouchy hagiographers. Boris Johnson and Co could cure any disease and would still be demoned.

What is frustrating is that he does not recognize the number of Conservatives who do not recognize their party. That is, many that the Conservatives consider non-conservative.

Register to our opinion newsletter

Register to our opinion newsletter

This is not a new problem, but an acute one these days. Like Theresa May and David Cameron, Boris Johnson repeatedly claimed that he would form a conservative “one-nation” government.

A nation’s conservatism could (to borrow Ted Heath) be called the acceptable face of the Conservative Party. It belongs to the small (c) tradition – conservatives believe that one cannot know everything and that institutions, organizations and professional fields are better left to those who specialize in them than politicians. They accept that there should be a social safety net, but are skeptical of senseless social tinkering and goals – politics must be justifiable with public reason.

Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli was the first to turn philosophy into an electoral creed. In his view, the role of politics was to overcome class stratifications (while accepting that they could never be eradicated). One-nation conservatism emphasizes paternalistic obligations to create prosperity, the cohesion of the country and a common national feeling for all.

Continue reading

Continue reading

Boris Johnson’s messy hair is a sign of general negligence – Simon …

It’s hard to see the last decade as an era of true conservatism. Playing in referendums (even if you discard the economic and political chaos that follows) is not good governance. The condescending tone of the SNP’s democratic mandate does not encourage a collective British feeling. Talking about “Global Britain” while international aid is cut is not a moral policy.

Disraeli was a skilled politician. Cynics who say his philosophy is to advance his own interests and find new relevance to the Tories would be right. Disraeli responded to the industrial revolution and political crises of the 1840s. The upheaval of industrialization opened a gap between the “two nations” of the rich and the poor. It had to find relevance to the Conservatives, as opposed to the free trade campaign and the rise of a liberal urban elite in their political sympathies.

Any true one-nation conservative and true Thatcher supporter interested in long-term stability would be appalled by the militant zeal of the “Brexit or die” mentality. You would be appalled at the government’s hostile environment towards EU citizens; the relentlessness towards the mandate of the SNP; the cut in international aid; the reduction in the universal credit; the casual cruelty towards migrant transitions; the inhumane aspects of Covid-19 deaths; and the human rights protection opt-outs. You would also be appalled by the endless allegations of corruption and feel that this is a favor government.

Johnson isn’t a Thatcherite either. That’s a lazy binary equation. The former prime minister described her style, substance and reasoning as contradicting her party’s “wets”. She wanted to replace the One Nation, the post-war consensus, with Thatcherism, monetarism and the New Right. But that doesn’t mean the opposite of Tory Wet is a Thatcherit today. One-nation conservatism and Thatcherism are decidedly less ideological, nationalistic, and chaotic than current government policies.

Disraeli didn’t actually say the phrase he is remembered for. Instead, it stems from his concern for the two divided industrial worlds in his novel à thèse Sybil (1845). It was Stanley Baldwin in 1924 who said that the Unionist Party, as it was then called, “should represent the unification of the two nations that Disraeli spoke of two generations ago: the unification of our own people into one nation to make our own people ”. “.

In order to reflect openly on Boris Johnson’s conservative and one-nation references, we should ask ourselves two questions: Who is his policy really good for? Is his policy suitable for a unifying consensus that unites the different interests, nations and social classes?

No peacetime prime minister has ever volunteered the British people for domestic and international disruption to the same extent as Johnson did. Cameron and even May were fire starters and torchbearers, but Johnson has an ugly, disgusting nationalism.

Johnson’s “ism” in history will not be conservatism, but narrow-mindedness. We could define his government as a government or a leader who is relentlessly committed to its goals and vehemently denies conflicting views and the dangers involved. Said government or leader excuses failure and rejects contradictions as unpatriotic and ignorant. It’s an angry, lanky populism that some may forgive for its ridiculousness and its silly leader.

As an addendum, we could add that it is less about the scandals than about the cognitive dissonance that goes with them. Gas lighting is another word. George Orwell’s 1984 Ministry of Truth physically changes and erases history; that twists the mind. Wasn’t Boris Johnson standing next to a big red bus promising the NHS £ 350m more a week during the Brexit referendum if we voted for Leave?

“One-nation conservatism,” “Tory democracy,” “paternalism” and “progressive conservatism” are some of the many names given to politics that place high value on the duty of citizens, especially the richest and most powerful, to be help those who are less fortunate.

The philosopher Michael Oakeshott said: “To be conservative means to prefer the known to the unknown, to prefer the tried and tested to the untested, the factual to the mysterious, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unlimited, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the abundance, the pleasant to the perfection, present laughter to utopian bliss ”.

Even the most ardent Conservative has to admit that the Prime Minister is not a Conservative. Certainly his politics and politics do not reflect this. He chases dreams and wages war against facts. This is not a One Nation Conservative.

A message from the editor:

Thank you for reading this article. We need your support more than ever as the changes in consumer habits caused by the coronavirus are affecting our advertisers.

If you haven’t already, support our trusted fact-checked journalism by adding a digital subscription.

Renee Stewart mourns lack of her canine | Arts & Leisure

Sir Rod Stewart’s daughter Renee mourns her dog Jagger.

The 28-year-old actress, daughter of hitmaker “I Don’t Want To Talk About It” and his second wife Rachel Hunter, has paid tribute to the rescue dog she has had for 13 years.

As reported in the Daily Mail’s Sebastian Shakespeare column, Renee wrote in honor, “This is one of the hardest things I have had to go through. The grief and loss I feel is indescribable. But you are no longer in pain and…” you walked peacefully in my arms. “

In the meantime, Renee had previously opened up as Rod’s daughter.

Of her younger years, she said, “It’s just not cool to talk about your parents. When I was in school in LA and people asked me what my dad did, I would say, ‘Oh, he’s in The entertainment.’

“No disrespect to him, but you want to make your own life. You want to be your own person. If you trade it it can really screw you up and it kind of makes people flinch.”

And Renee praised her father’s long career in music, but believes that now it would be much more difficult for similar people to be successful because of social media.

She added, “Oh, Dad had an amazing time in music. He worked so hard. And of course at some point you open your mouth and wonder if a soulful, rasping voice comes out. My sister Ruby was lucky. She did Lucky the voice and is in a band [the Sisterhood]but I don’t have it.

“In terms of a music career, I actually think it might be harder to make it in music these days. I don’t think the next Rolling Stones or Naomi Campbell would have a chance to make it now because there are literally millions of people out there on social media careers start. “

Penny Lancaster threw males’s pants at Sir Rod Stewart | Leisure

Sir Rod Stewart’s wife Penny Lancaster once threw him a pair of men’s underwear on the stage.

The hitmaker “I Don’t Want to Talk About It” is used to having women’s underwear thrown at him, and while performing in Las Vegas, he remembered his wife throwing him men’s pants from the audience.

On Harry Redknapp’s podcast, he said, “I was singing away in Las Vegas and a pair of men’s underpants showed up. They were really awful. It was my wife who vomited them! She was hiding in the audience, throwing up a pair of men’s underwear … I’ll still have thousands of women throwing their panties up. “

Meanwhile, Rod recently admitted that he is “stunned” that his wife had held him for two decades.

He said: “I am stunned that Penny kept me for 20 years.

“They didn’t make up the words for how I felt about them. She’s everything … It took me a while to learn because I’ve been a Scallywag in the past. But I’d say the most important things are good ones Manners – This is what I try to teach all of my boys. You can wear the best suits in the world, look great and have the best carpet, but you still need to show manners. Open the door for a lady, stand on when a lady goes to the bathroom when you have dinner. “

And Rod – who has eight children, including Aiden, nine, and Alastair, 14 with Penny – believes he gave his wife “a lot of confidence” to do her television work and her own career.

He said, “I’ve given her a lot of confidence. She does a lot of television work now and when we first met she was just a shy little person who didn’t talk a lot. I gave her the confidence. I’m sure it would they tell you. And she is there for me. “