Duran Duran recall how their model shifted after punk “acquired a bit uninteresting”

Duran Duran remembered how their style and musical focus shifted after punk got “a little boring” for them.

In a new interview, front man Simon Le Bon spoke about how the band once found the rebellious genre exciting but got boring after a while.

“Punk influenced our style of music, the way we dress; it had a massive lyrical influence on me – the greatest lyrical influence on me was Patti Smith. The album ‘Horses’ was a punk rock album, ”said Le Bon Fashion.

He continued, “But then something happened between us and punk: It went into a somewhat stricter style where everyone wore black and the album covers were one color. It all got a bit boring.

“And as teenagers, after six months, we were ready for the next one, you see? There was a collective consciousness: there were shops in Birmingham like the Oasis where color had suddenly become fashionable again. And as you know, I showed up in pink leopard skin pants. “

Duran Duran. CREDIT: Getty Images

In the meantime, Duran Duran drummer Roger Taylor announced earlier this week that the band was planning a biopic.

Speak with The sunTaylor said the band had looked at numerous scripts for a potential film and expected something to materialize “in the next few years”.

“It’s something that is being debated,” Taylor said of a biopic. “It is discussed and we have put forward different scripts and ideas.

“We haven’t quite made up our minds on the right one yet. But there are things in development so we’ll see where they go. We’d love to do something like that and I think something will happen in the next few years. “

Elsewhere, Simon Le Bon has called for streaming services to reform their payment models so that emerging artists get a bigger share.

The new wave icon warned that a “hole” could arise in the next generation of artists if musicians do not receive a higher rate per stream.

Duran Duran has released her new album ‘Future past’ last week (October 22nd). It offers collaborations and production pairings with Tove Lo, Ivory doll, CHAI, Giorgio Moroder, Erol alkane and Blur‘S Graham Coxon.

California counties with excessive Covid vaccination charges helped Newsom win recall election

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks to media representatives after meeting students from Melrose Leadership Academy while attending school in Oakland, Calif. On Wednesday, September 15, 2021.

Stephen Lam | San Francisco Chronicle | Hearst Newspapers via Getty Images

California Governor Gavin Newsom named his decisive victory Victory for Vaccines and Science in this week’s recall vote. The dates confirm him.

A CNBC analysis of the county-level results – which are tentative as ballots continue to be counted – found a strong association between support for Newsom and counties with high Covid vaccination rates on election day, Sept. 14.

People in counties with high Covid vaccination rates voted overwhelmingly to keep him in office. Conversely, people in counties with lower vaccination rates voted for the governor’s removal.

“‘No’ is not the only thing said tonight. I want to focus on what we as a state said ‘Yes’ to,” Newsom said late Tuesday in Sacramento, thanking his supporters. “We said ‘yes’ to science, we said ‘yes’ to vaccines, we said ‘yes’ to ending this pandemic.

The analysis also shows that people in many of California’s smaller counties are less likely to support Newsom and get vaccinated.

Of the 23 districts with fewer than 100,000 inhabitants, 17 or around three quarters voted with “yes” for the recall. Meanwhile, only 10 of the 35 counties with more than 100,000 residents voted for the recall.

These small counties also tended to have lower vaccination rates. Eighteen of the 23 reported fewer than 50% of residents were fully vaccinated on election day, according to a CNBC analysis of data from the California Department of Health.

Lassen County, for example, has an estimated population of around 30,600 (as of 2019) and a current vaccination rate of nearly 22%. Around 84% of voters voted “yes” to the recall.

Similarly, Modoc County has an estimated population of 8,800 (as of 2019) and a current vaccination rate of 36.3%. 78 percent of voters also supported the recall.

At the other end of the spectrum, Los Angeles County has an estimated population of over 10 million (as of 2019) and a vaccination rate of 59.5%. Newsom’s voters strongly supported Newsom, with 70.8% voting “no”.

The majority of counties classified as rural or predominantly rural supported Newsom and were less likely to be vaccinated, according to the latest 2010 data from the Census Bureau defines rural as a population, dwelling, or territory that is not in an urban area or in areas of 50,000 or more residents.

Ten of the eleven counties classified as rural or predominantly rural in California voted “yes” to the recall. These include Amador County, Calaveras County, Lassen County, Mariposa County, Modoc County, Plumas County, Sierra County, Siskiyou County, Tehama County, and Trinity County, according to California’s Secretary of State.

According to CNBC analysis, all 10 of these counties reported vaccination rates below 50% on election day.

President Joe Biden, who ran for Newsom on the eve of Election Day, reiterated the governor’s opinion of his victory.

“This vote is an overwhelming victory for the approach he and I share to defeating the pandemic: strong vaccine requirements, strong steps to safely reopen schools, and strong plans to distribute real drugs – not fake treatments – to help those out who get sick. “Said Biden in a statement on Wednesday.

While the preliminary election results suggest the majority of Californians support the state’s pandemic measures, it was initially Newsom’s response to Covid that threatened its political fate.

Nationwide mask requirements, stay-at-home orders, and a maskless appearance by the governor at a high-end Napa Valley restaurant at the height of the rising Covid cases helped the recall petition gain momentum late last year and close to 1, Made 5 million Californians sign it.

However, Newsom’s handling of the pandemic over the past few months, including its vaccine roll-out and mandates, became one of its strengths in the recall election.

The governor introduced Covid vaccine requirements for government officials and healthcare workers in late July entered into force on August 5th. He also introduced similar vaccination requirements for teachers and other school staff, a first in the nation that entered into force on August 12th.

California Governor Gavin Newsom attends a press conference to launch a Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Immunization Center on February 8, 2021 in San Diego, California.

Sandy Huffaker | Swimming pool | via Reuters

In the weeks leading up to the election, Newsom’s campaign criticized conservative talk show host Larry Elder, the Republican front runner, for agreeing to end such vaccine mandates and other pandemic measures.

The governor’s vigorous election campaign also promoted the state’s high vaccination rates in recent months. According to Friday, 59.23% of the state’s population is fully vaccinated Data compiled from Johns Hopkins University.

A September poll published in the run-up to the recall election found that more than 3 in 4 Californians believe the state government is doing “an excellent or good job” distributing Covid vaccines. And about 6 in 10 said they approve of the overall way Newsom has responded to the pandemic, according to the Public Policy Institute of California poll.

“While a small group of cowardly, corrupt scammers in the Republican Party seek to attract attention by undermining trust in science and public health, the vast majority of Americans have not been fooled – they understand that vaccinations save lives “And they” support vaccine mandates with common sense, “Los Angeles-based Democratic adviser Michael Soneff said in an email.

Mountain of Cash Fuels Newsom’s Surge to Recall Election End Line

Governor Gavin Newsom’s offer of defense a recall in California has been bolstered in the past few months by a tens of millions of dollars in infusion from major donors that gave him a tremendous financial advantage over his Republican rivals on the final leg of the race.

There had been moments over the summer when Mr. Newsom, a Democrat, had appeared in public polls as vulnerable as California’s unique callback rules seemed to provide an opening for the Conservatives in one of the nation’s most trusted democratic states. But Mr. Newsom raised more than $ 70 million in an account this year to combat the recall, much of it in July and August, which allowed him and his allies to dominate the television network and promote their opponents online .

California has no restrictions on donations to recall committees, and Mr. Newsom has taken full advantage of these loose rules. His contributions included an early $ 3 million from Reed Hastings, the CEO of Netflix; $ 500,000 from liberal philanthropist George Soros; and $ 500,000 from Hollywood producer Jeffrey Katzenberg. Dr. Priscilla Chan, a philanthropist and wife of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, contributed $ 750,000 and real estate tycoon George Marcus gave $ 1 million.

Millions of dollars more came from stakeholders doing business in front of the state, including unions representing service workers, teachers and prison guards, the real estate industry, and Indian tribes who run casinos.

On the Republican side, the financial cavalry never made it.

Mr. Newsom’s aggressive efforts to deter other prominent Democrats from running for office cemented the party’s financial power to protect his post. When dismissed in California, voters ask themselves two questions: first, whether the governor should be removed, and second, who should be the replacement. During the last recall election in 2003, Democrats struggled with the notoriously unwieldy slogan “no recall; yes on Bustamante ”when Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, moved into governorship.

This year, the state’s Democrats and Republicans seem to agree on one thing ahead of Tuesday’s election: Money mattered. All in all, Mr Newsom spent more on fighting the recall than he did on his 2018 election.

“If Gavin couldn’t raise the money, he could have lost in the face of the amount of apathy and fear,” said Kerman Maddox, a Democratic strategist in California who also served as a party donor. “I’ll just be real.”

Dave Gilliard, a Republican strategist who was involved in the recall effort, said of the cash gap, “It definitely made a difference.”

Despite the large sums of money involved in the recall, the total cost of the race is actually less than that of a single election last year, than Uber and Lyft have teamed up to successfully push for rules App-based companies allow drivers and other workers to continue to be classified as independent contractors. This ballot has drawn roughly $ 225 million in spending because of the state’s many large and expensive media markets, including Los Angeles.

Mr Newsom used his financial advantage to overpower his Republican rivals and supporters of the televised recall in July and August by a ratio of almost four to one, giving the $ 20.4 million for the $ 5.6 million, according to data -Dollars of callback advocates from ad tracking company AdImpact. Some of these advertisements framed the race in the crassest of words, with a passage saying that was the result of the recall “it’s about life and death” because of the coronavirus.

On YouTube and Google, the financial inequality was even worse. Newsom has spent nearly $ 4.1 million, according to Google’s disclosure documents, while its leading Republican opponent, radio talk show host Larry Elder, has spent just over $ 600,000.

the sudden appearance of Mr. Elder As the Republican front runner – he entered the competition in July and had raised more than $ 13 million by the end of August – Mr. Newsom supplied a finished Republican slide. A blatant conservative, Mr. Elder had left a number of radio clips outlining unpopular positions with the Democrats on issues such as the environment, abortion, and the minimum wage.

“Lo and behold, he received a gift from the gods on behalf of Larry Elder, the conservative African-American version of Donald Trump,” said Maddox, adding that the specter of an elder-governor had motivated donors large and small alike.

Updated

9/10/2021, 1:05 p.m. ET

It hadn’t always been clear that Mr. Newsom would have such a crucial monetary advantage. Some party contributors were slow to get involved. Ron Conway, a San Francisco-based venture capitalist who made early stage efforts in the tech community to combat product recalls and fundraisers, said he was fired early. “Back then, a lot of people thought I was scare tactics,” he wrote in an email. “They don’t think so anymore!”

State records show that nearly two-thirds of donations of $ 10,000 or more went to Mr. Newsom’s primary account against recalls after July 1. And overall, more than 80 percent of the US $ 10,000 donations came from California.

“Democrats would rather not have to fund an off-year race in California,” said Dan Newman, an advisor to Mr. Newsom. “But they didn’t hesitate when it was clear what was at stake.”

Mr Newsom’s campaign said it was expecting 600,000 donations by the election after running a robust online donation program. Much of the money, however, came from huge donations, with $ 48.2 million in its main account against recalls from donations of $ 100,000 or more.

In late August, attendees at a donor retreat in Aspen, Colorado for Democratic Governors Association contributors said there was some grumbling and anger about the need to redirect all resources to a blue state like California – especially given the tough races in the world of governors are scheduled to take place in 2022.

The Governors Association has so far transferred $ 5.5 million to the Newsom operation against the recall.

“It’s not a good sign for the Democrats in 2022 when they have to burn millions of dollars on a recall in America’s most liberal state,” said Jesse Hunt, communications director for the Republican Governors Association.

From the start, Mr. Newsom’s campaign framed the recall as a Republican seizure of power, making it particularly unattractive for some major GOP contributors to get involved in the race, according to National and California Republicans. The unusual demand by the state that the names of the top donors appear in advertisements was also a deterrent, along with widespread disbelief that California could ever really be turned around.

“There are a lot of people who are for us but never believe it’s possible,” said Anne Hyde Dunsmore, campaign manager for Rescue California, one of the pro-recalls. “No, the money didn’t come in, and no, it wasn’t for lack of demand.”

Some major checks came. Mr. Elder received $ 1 million from Geoffrey Palmer, a real estate developer and major Republic donor. Saul Fox, a private equity manager, donated $ 100,000. And Mr. Elder quickly outstripped the rest of the Republican field in fundraising with donations large and small.

John Cox, the Republican who lost to Mr. Newsom in a 2018 landslide, has again spent millions of his own dollars. One of his costly moves was campaigning with a 1,000 pound Kodiak bear named Tag, Who else appeared in Mr. Cox’s advertisements.

Kevin Faulconer, a Republican former mayor of San Diego, raised more than $ 4 million for his candidacy, and Kevin Kiley, a Republican MP, raised more than $ 1 million.

Caitlyn Jenner, the transgender activist and former Olympian, received a wave of publicity their entry to the race. But their offer and fundraising have largely failed. By the end of August, Ms. Jenner had raised less than $ 1 million and had less than $ 28,000 in cash – with more than unpaid bills.

Gale Kaufman, a Sacramento-based Democratic strategist, said the fragmented and financially weak Republican field had “prevented them from ever launching a ‘yes’ campaign” – for the recall – “met with response.”

“They don’t speak with one voice and they don’t say the same thing,” she said.

Mike Netter, a Republican who was one of the early organizers of the recall, was frustrated by the Democratic attack that the push was a Republican attempt to seize power. He said there was little conservative support after supporters of the recall put the measure on the ballot.

“If we’re supposed to be so Republican, where’s our money? Where is the air cover from our supposedly right-wing secret organizations? ”Mr Netter said, referring to the lack of large donations from the party and leading Republicans such as MP Devin Nunes. “Nobody believed in us for so long. And it’s not that we have that much money. It’s not like the Koch brothers are my cousins ​​or anything. I went to the state of San Diego. “

Shawn Hubler contributed to the coverage.

Gavin Newsom recall marketing campaign cash tracker

In summary

Keep track of who’s giving money and where it’s coming from on this dashboard, which is updated daily, in the Gavin Newsom recall campaign.

The forecast for this summer is hot, with a high risk of forest fires and a fever campaign to determine the political fate of Governor Gavin Newsom.

The fight to recall Newsom has already consumed state politics, with the governor has been in campaign mode since March and both sides are already reporting Millions of dollars in the bank. While the recall date has not yet been set, it will be the second big pick in as many years, and a third is on the way in 2022.

For recall supporters, having money and grassroots support will be vital in a state where registered Democrats are two-to-one more Republicans than Republicans. Newsom only added more than $ 5.8 million to its campaign fund in May.

We will follow the money and update this page daily with data from the Foreign Minister. As always, let us know what your questions about funding this wild choice.

How much money did each side raise?

Where does the money come from?

We can only tell this to a certain extent because we don’t know where the small dollar contributions are coming from. However, due to larger contributions that the state classifies as “broken down,” it is clear that the vast majority of the money comes from California.

Who gives the money?

Unlike contributions to candidates, there is no limit to how much donors can give to the recall committees. Here are the top ten contributors on each page.

And we want to hear from you!

methodology

The data is updated daily by the California Secretary of State’s Cal Access Database.

We’ll add broken down and consistent posts to get the grand total from each page. However, we only use itemized posts for analysis by state because post information is not reported for consistent posts.

We ignore contributions between committees that are on the same page of the topic as they are essentially transfers.

To avoid doubling some of the contributions from the Patriot Coalition USA and Rescue California, two pro-recall committees, we ignore non-monetary contributions to the Patriot Coalition. This is because money raised by Rescue California that was earmarked for main committee activities such as collecting signatures must be reported by both committees.

This tracker contains committees formed by candidates specifically for the recall. We currently have the following committees:

FPPC ID Surname
1424018 CALIFORNIA PATRIOT COALITION – RECALL GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM
1434853 RESCUE CALIFORNIA – TO SUPPORT THE RECALL OF GAVIN NEWSOM
1435892 CAREGIVERS AND CALIFORNIANS UNITED AGAINST THE RECALL OF GOVERNOR NEWSOM, SPONSORED BY THE NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTH WORKERS
1436851 STOP GOVERNOR NEWSOM’S REPUBLICAN RECALL
1437098 RECALL NEWSOM! REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION ACTION
1437408 STOP THE STEAL CALIFORNIA and decline GAVIN NEWSOM’s recall
1437864 CLEAN CALIFORNIA, KEVIN FAULCONER’S BALLOT MEASURING COMMITTEE TO RECALL GAVIN NEWSOM

The committees registered with the California FPPC that we believe may be involved in the recall.

Non secular leaders recall Prince Philip’s non secular curiosity | Leisure

In the 1960s, he helped set up St. George’s House, a religious study center at the Windsor Castle seat of the royal family, where Philip discussed the state of the world with clergy, academics, businessmen and politicians.

He regularly visited Mount Athos, a monastic community and religious sanctuary in Greece, and was a long-time sponsor of the Templeton Prize, a lucrative award for his contribution to the “spiritual dimension” of life, of which Mother Teresa is one of the winners.

Philip’s longtime environmental protection, during which he acted as patron of the Worldwide Fund for Nature, was tied to his faith. In 1986 he organized a summit meeting in Assisi, Italy, at which representatives of Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism and Hinduism committed themselves to protecting the environment. Philip said at the time that “a new and powerful alliance has been made between the forces of religion and the forces of conservation”.

Philip was blunt and quick-witted and known for making comments that could be deeply offensive, some of them sexist and racist. However, Uganda-born former Archbishop of York John Sentamu said those who viewed Philip as bigot are far from the goal.

“If someone challenged him, you’d get into an amazing conversation,” Sentamu told the BBC. “The problem was that people had this deference because he was the Duke of Edinburgh, the Queen’s husband.

Ford to spend $610 million to recall three million autos

A visitor walks past a Ford Escape Titanium at a car show last April.

Greg Baker | AFP | Getty Images

DETROIT – Ford engine will recall 3 million older vehicles due to possible problems with their airbag inflators, estimated to cost the automaker $ 610 million.

The company confirmed the cost in a petition filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission Thursday after the closing bell. Ford stock fell into the red during after-business trading, down about 2%. The stock rose 6.2% on Thursday to $ 11.53 per share – the share highest close since June 2018. Ford’s market capitalization is more than $ 45 billion.

In the filing, Ford said the expense will be treated as a special item as part of its earnings for the fourth quarter on February 4th. This means he has no impact on Ford’s adjusted earnings before interest and taxes or adjusted earnings per share – closely watched items from Wall Street.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration turned down a 2017 petition from Ford on Tuesday to avoid recalling the vehicles carrying the potentially dangerous airbags made by auto supplier Takata.

The affected vehicles range from model years 2006 to 2012. These include Ford Ranger (2007-2011), Fusion (2006-2012), Edge (2007-2010), Lincoln MKZ / Zephyr (2006-2012), MKX (2007-2010 )) and Mercury Milan (2006-2011) vehicles.

The recall will affect approximately 2.7 million vehicles in the U.S. and approximately 300,000 in Canada and other locations, the company said.

Takata airbag inflators have been a constant issue for automakers for years. The failure can cause airbag inflators to burst and potentially deadly metal objects to fly inside the vehicle. The problem has been linked to the deaths of at least 27 people worldwide and 18 in the US, according to Reuters. The more than 67 million inflators problem is the largest automobile recall in US history