Shark Tank-style innovation problem pushes college students to search out options to each day issues

Ailani Barr, a freshman at Armstrong Junior High, wants to find a way to relieve her grandmother’s liver problems.

As part of a new project-based science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) learning program, FlexFactor, Barr learned the importance of flexible hybrid electronics and how it can be used to solve real-world problems.

In order to detect gastrointestinal diseases and other problems that can result from the liver, she, along with a few other students, came up with the idea of ​​a camera contained in a pill that goes through the digestive system and is attached to the liver to find possible gastric complications.

“We thought about it because my grandma has liver problems and she’s older, so she doesn’t believe in a lot of medical technology. This could give her a way to tell if she has liver problems,” Barr said.

Students across the Golden Triangle are learning about the importance of manufacturing and hybrid electronics.

FlexFactor is locally managed by East Mississippi Community College and owned by the NextFlex research institute. The students identify a problem they want to fix, research a way to solve it and show their project idea to a panel in a “Shark Tank” -style presentation. Camille Cooper, coordinator of the EMCC FlexFactor Outreach, said this program not only teaches students to think critically, but also introduces them to careers that they may not necessarily be familiar with.

Camille Cooper

“We want students to see themselves as something after high school,” said Cooper. “We’re not necessarily trying to push them to EMCC or an advanced manufacturing career. … This program just gives you a lot of different opportunities and teaches you real life. “

Together with Armstrong Junior High, EMCC has partnered with Columbus High School and Golden Triangle Early College High School to produce FlexFactor – with 278 students in those three schools learning skills such as problem identification, research methodology, and slide presentation programs.

The program began in mid-October and ends on November 17, when students present their graduation projects to panels composed of school board members, community partners, and representatives from the Golden Triangle Development Link. Cooper said FlexFactor is bringing K-12 education, college, and the professional industries together to help future generations.

“It’s really rewarding to see how far these students have come in six weeks,” said Cooper. “This program lets you think outside the box. There are already solutions for many things, but that makes them a little more difficult and gives them the opportunity to develop their own solution. “

Katie Young, the AJH freshman faculty sponsor, said the students for this program were selected by those who were in manufacturing and technology for the You Science test, an aptitude test that not only had career interests but also Abilities measures have been accelerated. Young said she loved watching her students excel on this program because it allows them to learn about careers in manufacturing.

“It was great to see our kids doing something outside of their normal routine,” said Young. “It’s a way to apply the skills you’ve learned in the classroom and solve real-world problems. That really gives teenagers strength. “

Barr said FlexFactor inspired her to potentially pursue a career in manufacturing in the future, as she now knows the process of making technological products.

“It was a good experience because I saw how things are done,” said Barr. “… I could imagine doing such a job.”

Close by residents grapple with well being issues

Magali Sanchez-Hall, who has lived in Wilmington for over two decades, has struggled with asthma all her life. She says the health problem stems from her proximity to oil and gas wells.

Emma Newburger | CNBC

LOS ANGELES, CALIF. – If you come out of a coffee shop off Interstate 110 in the Wilmington neighborhood of Los Angeles, a foul smell will instantly hit you.

Magali Sanchez-Hall, 51, who has lived here for more than two decades, is used to the smell of rotting eggs wafting from hundreds of oil wells in the neighborhood. She’s used to her neighbors describing chronic coughs, rashes, and diagnoses of cancer, and to the asthma affecting her own family, who live just 500 meters from a refinery.

“When people develop cancer or have asthma, they might think it’s normal or blame genetics,” she said. “We don’t often look at the environment we are in and think – the chemicals we breathe are the cause.”

Wilmington, a predominantly working-class Latin American immigrant community of more than 50,000 people, has some of the highest rates of asthma and cancer in the state. according to a report by the nonprofit communities for a better environment. It is surrounded by six oil refineries and surrounded by several highways and the ports of LA and Long Beach.

California that seventh largest oil producing country in the US has no rule or standard for the distance active oil wells must be from communities. For many Californians, especially blacks and browns, pungent smells, noise, and dirt from oil production are part of the neighborhood.

When walking around Wilmington, pumpjacks can be seen in public parks, next to schoolyards where children play, and outside the windows of people at home. At night the sky is lit orange by refinery torches.

The discovery of oil in the 1920s resulted in significant population growth in the area. People built and bought houses next to the oil fields and refineries that employ thousands of residents in the area. The industry employs approximately 37,000 people in LA County, according to a report by Capitol Matrix Consulting.

Oil tanks are sandwiched between houses in the Wilmington neighborhood of Los Angeles.

Emma Newburger | CNBC

According to analysis by the nonprofit FracTracker Alliance, more than 2 million California residents live within 2,500 feet of an operating oil and gas well and another 5 million – 14% of the state’s population – are within 1 mile.

The residents of LA County, where the Inglewood Oil Field is located, are particularly at risk. The 1,000 acre site is one of the largest urban oil fields in the country and is operated and operated by Sentinel Peak Resources. More than half a million people live within a quarter of a mile of active wells that release dangerous air pollutants such as benzene, hydrogen sulfide, particulate matter, and formaldehyde.

Sentinel Peak did not respond to requests for comment.

Sanchez-Hall didn’t understand the connection between the nearby refineries and the health problems in her community until she left. She graduated from college and got a masters degree from UCLA, taking courses in environmental law, and now advocates for cleaner air and energy in her neighborhood.

“Wilmington is Ground Zero for pollution,” said Sanchez-Hall. “Now I understand why the people around me were dying of cancer. We are not throwaway people. There is one major downside because a lot of us don’t know what is happening.”

No buffer zone between drilling and people

Research has shown that people who live near oil and gas wells are exposed to harmful pollution and are at higher risk Premature births, Asthma, Respiratory disease and cancer.

Staying near oil wells has been linked to decreased lung function and wheezing, and in some cases respiratory damage can rival that of daily exposure to secondhand smoke or living on a highway, according to a study recently published in the journal Environmental research.

Another study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, analyzed nearly 3 million births in California from women who lived within 6 miles of at least one oil or gas well. The authors concluded that living near these wells during pregnancy increased the risk of low birth weight babies.

Environmental protection groups have urged California Governor Gavin Newsom to establish a 2,500 foot buffer zone, or setback, between fossil fuel businesses and homes and schools. This year, a law banning fracking and establishing a buffer zone failed in a vote in the state committee.

Other oil producing states, including Colorado, Pennsylvania, and Texas, have already established some sort of buffer zone between properties and wells.

In 2019, Newsom ordered its regulators to look into such a health and safety regulation, but they failed to meet the December 2020 deadline for action. State oil regulators also missed a newer deadline in the spring to enact new regulations that would help protect the health and safety of people near drilling sites. The California Geologic Energy Management Division, which oversees the state’s fossil fuel industries, has not yet set a new regulatory schedule.

The governor has now approved around 9,014 oil and gas permits since 2019, after an analysis of status data from Consumer Watchdog and FracTracker Alliance.

“The communities at the front have waited too long for very basic protection against dangerous oil and gas projects,” Hollin Kretzmann, attorney for the Center for Biodiversity, said recently sued the state for approving thousands of drilling and fracking projects without the required environmental assessment.

“A safety buffer is the absolute minimum,” said Kretzmann. “The fact that our state continues to delay is frustrating and completely unacceptable.”

Josiah Edwards, 21, grew up near the largest oil refinery on the west coast. “Oil drilling and refining has always been a ubiquitous backdrop in my life,” he said.

Emma Newburger | CNBC

The Western States Petroleum Association and the State Building and Construction Trades Council have opposed a nationwide mandate to establish buffer zones, arguing that doing so would harm workers and increase fuel costs.

“A single state approach to a problem like this is rarely good public policy,” said WSPA spokesman Kevin Slagle. “Kickback distances that are not based on region-specific data could have a significant impact on communities, jobs, and the affordability and reliability of energy in the state.”

Environmentalists have also urged Newsom to impose an immediate moratorium on all new oil and gas permits in these zones.

Earlier this year, the governor directed government agencies Suspend new fracking permits by 2024 and consider halting oil production by 2045. The announcement marked a change of position from Newsom, who previously said he was has no executive authority Ban fracking, which, according to the state’s Department of Conservation, accounts for only 2% of California’s oil production.

Newsom’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

Newsom’s predecessor Jerry Brown, who served between 2011 and 2018, approved 21,397 new oil wells. More than three-quarters of the new wells under Brown’s management are in low-income communities and paint communities. according to country data analyzed by the Center for Biodiversity.

“I could have had a better life”

Josiah Edwards, 21, grew up in Carson, a town in the South Bay region of Los Angeles and near the West Coast’s largest oil refinery owned by. is Marathon Petroleum Corp.. Edwards and his family members suffered from asthma and were constantly concerned about breathing in emissions from nearby refineries.

“Oil drilling and refining has always been a presence in my life,” said Edwards, who now volunteers for the Sunrise Movement, an environmental protection group in Los Angeles.

Edwards remembered getting bloody noses as a child and linking them to pollution from refineries. He delved into research on how exposure to pollution can contribute to the development of childhood asthma and wondered if his life would have been any different from how he grew up elsewhere.

“It makes me angry and upset. There is a situation where, with improved health outcomes, I could have had a better life,” said Edwards. “Even if it still makes me angry, I find a lot of hope in what could be. There is potential for change.”

Marathon spokesman Jamal Kheiry said the company’s Carson refinery has invested in air emissions control equipment and has reduced its pollutant emissions by 35% over the past decade. It has also invested $ 25 million in installing air monitoring systems around its facilities and making those results available to the public.

The Wilmington Athletic Complex is located next to oil tanks.

Emma Newburger | CNBC

Exit from oil and gas on site

Some parts of the state have taken matters into their own hands.

Culver City in LA County issue an ordinance phasing out oil and gas production in its portion of the Inglewood Oil Field within five years, in one of the most ambitious moves in any oil producing jurisdiction. The ordinance also requires that all wells be closed and abandoned during this period.

Ventura County, northwest of LA, has established a buffer zone of 2,500 meters between oil wells and schools and 1,500 feet between wells and homes.

And LA County rulers unanimously voted earlier this month to phase out oil and gas drilling and to ban new drilling sites in the non-incorporated areas. The county stands ready to determine the fastest route to legal decommissioning of wells before providing a timeline for phasing out.

Jacob Roper, a spokesman for the Department of Conservation, of which CalGEM is a sub-agency, said the department is “working hard to develop a science-based health and safety ordinance to protect communities and workers from the effects of oil exploration. “

“This is a complex set of rules with something outside of our previous regulatory experience,” said Roper. “It involves working closely with other government agencies and an independent panel of public health experts to ensure a thorough analysis of relevant scientific and technical practices.”

LA could become one of the first major cities in the US to remove fossil fuels almost entirely from its energy supply without affecting the economy, according to a current study on behalf of the city. Technologies like solar parks, wind turbines, batteries and electric vehicles would enable the transition while reducing harmful air pollution in the most vulnerable communities.

“There are local officials who take this issue seriously,” said Kretzmann. “But the fires, prolonged drought and heat waves in California are a clear indication that we need to be much more courageous about fossil fuels.”

South Africa has no cash to throw at its issues

A member of the military patrols while the country is deploying the army to quell riots surrounding the imprisonment of former President Jacob Zuma in Soweto, South Africa, on July 13, 2021. REUTERS / Siphiwe Sibeko

LONDON, July 15 (Reuters Breakingviews) – South Africa is running out of its usual social patch. The normal response of the ruling African National Congress to the rampaging mob is to smash a few heads and then apply government money to the wounds. The unprecedented scale of last week’s unrest and Pretoria’s growing mountain of debt preclude such an outcome.

Ironically, the law breaking and looting, which resulted in the death of at least 70 people, came from one of the most beautiful hours in the legal system. Jacob Zuma’s arrest for contempt by the Constitutional Court signaled that no one, not even a former president, was above the law. However, getting this through is tough on looters who are either too destitute or desperate to take care of it – unemployment hit a record 32.6% this year. Others believe that they are merely following the guidance of a habitually kleptocratic state.

The deployment of President Cyril Ramaphosa troops – the mind-boggling part of the ANC crisis playbook – was intended to restore some semblance of order. But the damage looks serious. Durban, the continent’s largest port, suffered severe disruptions, as did the huge Richards Bay coal export terminal and the national road and rail network. The largest oil refinery in the country had to close as well as numerous Covid-19 vaccination centers. All of this helps an economy that will grow only 3.3% this year, a relatively subdued recovery after falling 7.2% last year.

In 2016, the government defused student unrest by increasing university funding by 11%. A similar answer now looks more difficult. The pandemic and economic stagnation under Zuma mean debt is 80% of GDP, up from just 53% three years ago. The government hopes it will peak at 89% in 2026, but could miss it if the unrest drags on or investment subsides. Even before the pandemic, the International Monetary Fund assumed that borrowing was on an unsustainable path. On top of that, bond investors get nervous, especially when the Federal Reserve begins to tighten US monetary policy. Returns over 9% on debt due in 2030 are no exception – they’re on the up.

Higher interest rates also limit Ramaphosa’s scope for budgetary adjustments to ease public anger. The Treasury Department expects debt servicing costs to rise 45% over the next three years to consume 16% of government spending. In the same period, the health budget will be flattened and social spending will fall by a fifth. This week’s riots could be the first glimpse into a dark future.

consequences @edwardcropley on twitter


– Rioters ransacked shops and offices in South Africa on July 14, defying government demands for silence after a week of violence in which at least 70 people were killed.

– The worst unrest in years, initially sparked by the arrest of former President Jacob Zuma for disobeying the court, forced the closure of the country’s largest oil refinery and disrupted its Covid-19 vaccination program.

– President Cyril Ramaphosa sent the army to support the fighting police. He also warned of a possible food shortage.

The rand lost 4% from July 12 to July 14, hitting 14.79 against the dollar, its lowest level in more than three months. Public debt has also come under pressure, as the benchmark bond 2030 yield rose 15 basis points to 9.05% on July 14.

Arrangement by George Hay and Oliver Taslic

Reuters Breakingviews is the world’s leading source for agenda setting financial information. As a Reuters financial commentary brand, we analyze the great business and economic stories that circulate around the world every day. A global team of around 30 correspondents in New York, London, Hong Kong and other major cities provide expert analysis in real time.

Register for a free trial version of our full service at and follow us on Twitter @Breakingviews and at All opinions expressed are those of the authors.

THURSDAY: Huge cash for large issues | Every day Index

I know it’s all relative, but we seem to be living in an age of ever greater numbers. Or maybe it’s just me, an aging retired farm boy who can remember paying a dime for a cold and sweaty bottle of Coca Cola at the international harvester dealership in downtown town across from the outer runway and 34 cents for a gallon of gasoline Delbert two blocks further.

On Wednesday, President Biden and the Democrats in Congress – most of them anyway – came together on a $ 3.5 trillion budget plan to expand the reach of education and health care, tax the rich and fight climate change.

While it’s doubtful our man in DC, Senator Joe Manchin, DW.Va., will pull this off without significant cost reductions, if not creative payment strategies, $ 3.5 trillion is a huge number – and it would be Buy lots of Coke for the boys sitting around – but smaller, much smaller than our $ 28.5 trillion national debt.

Still, some would argue, the country has big problems to solve and the world around us is crumbling.

For example, another large number on Wednesday: 93,331 people in the US died of drug overdoses in 2020, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It was the biggest increase in a year. The New York Times found that those 93,000 deaths, because they killed so many young people, cost Americans about 3.5 million years of life.

Those are big numbers too.

As of Wednesday morning, the coronavirus pandemic has claimed more than 608,000 lives here in the United States alone and more than 4 million people – and an incalculable number of tears flowing into rivers – worldwide.

In the midst of all this, I believe there is nothing more important and challenging before us than climate change. The proposal of the Democrats is – as otherwise – very big. But the reason the price may seem excessive is because the Democrats are also trying to redesign social programs. This is the soft infrastructure that Senator Shelley Moore Capito has been betting against. If the Dems have their way – and they could very well – pre-kindergarten would be universal for all 3- and 4-year-olds, two years of community college would be free, utility companies would be required to produce a certain amount of clean energy, and through the Expanding Medicare, Democrats would fund new dental, visual, and hearing services, as well as changes to federal law aimed at lowering the cost of prescription drugs.

So that we can all keep the accounts separate, Tuesday’s Democratic deal must not be confused with the $ 1.2 trillion infrastructure deal that a few dozen members of both political parties negotiated last month. This bill could already show its face in the Senate next week and come into effect sometime before the August recess at the end of August.

And for the record, the recent Democratic-only deal would extend an expansion of the child tax credit – payments that will begin today, Thursday, as part of another and, yes, major coronavirus aid package worth $ 1.9 trillion .

Keep it all clear?

OK Good. Because here’s the thing – brought to us by some other big numbers: Our western states are burning and their water sources are drying up.

From January 1st to July 13th of this year there were 33,953 fires, according to the more than 2 million hectares National Interagency Fire Center, which is higher than last year for the same period.

In California alone, more than 103,000 more hectares burned through July 11 this year than in the same period in 2020, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

It is clear the world is getting warmer and the effects are felt to some extent in the here and now, from coast to coast and in all areas in between.

The solution, if not just a passing answer, may have to be – what else – great.

– J. Damon Cain is editor of The Register-Herald. To reach him, email

Are Jo’s Cash Issues Actually That Unrealistic?

Grey’s Anatomy isn’t really known for its realism. At long last, how many plane crashes can a group of people suffer? The team at Gray Sloan Memorial Hospital were hit by two separate plane crashes, which is well above average.

Camilla Luddington as Jo | Gilles Mingasson / ABC via Getty Images

When Jo had money problems and had to sell their shares in the hospital, some fans cried foul. Surely a doctor would have enough money to cover all necessary expenses?

Jo had to sell her shares for a lawyer

In the final season finale of Grey’s, Jo decided to do whatever she could to adopt Luna, a sick baby she’d taken care of. That meant selling their hospital shares to get an adoption attorney. Jo was try to adopt Luna for some time. Luna was a miracle baby that grew outside of her mother’s womb. She was operated on in the 26th week of pregnancy, which is dangerously premature.

Like many premature babies, Luna had her share of health problems in the first few weeks of her life. Unfortunately, her mother never recovered from the operation and died while Luna was still in the neonatal intensive care unit. While she was in the hospital Jo fell in love with her.

Jo decided to fight for custody of Luna and eventually got it. But custody was an uphill battle for Jo, and it meant liquidating her fortune as much as possible so she could afford a lawyer. Fans don’t think Jo’s money problems are realistic given her impressive position in the hospital.

Fans think Jo’s money problems are unrealistic

Grey’s fans Reddit think that a surgeon in a large hospital wouldn’t have to sell anything to buy a lawyer. Although the whole story of Luna’s pregnancy outside of her mother’s womb is a long way off, fans have a problem imagining Jo making money. Some fans see this as a common story hole in Grey’s. Many of the doctors have roommates, which seems unnecessary given the likely high salaries.

But other fans can buy Jo’s spending money, especially given the high cost of living in Seattle and student loans. One fan estimated that Jo is likely making $ 200,000 a year. Another fan replied, “That’s not a salary high enough to have a TON of cash just lying around. Seattle is one of the most expensive places to live in the United States. ”Plus, Jo switched to OB from the operation, which means she’s back to a resident doctor. Presumably she would have had to accept a substantial cut in her salary as a result of the move.

Most of Jo’s monthly income may go towards student loans

Although Redditors estimated Jo’s annual salary at around $ 200,000, they are Comparable, it’s likely between $ 160,000 and $ 187,000 as Jo returned to a residence time. That’s still a lot of money, but as fans pointed out, Seattle is expensive. Also, as another fan wrote, the student loans for doctors are huge. Medical school is expensive and Jo could still pay it off.

Student Loan Hero Claims that without an income-based repayment plan, medical school graduates could pay more than $ 2,000 a month on their loans. That, plus the cost of living, may have made Jo a little short for an adoption attorney.

Then there is the adoption attorney himself. While some adoptions are easy, Luna probably wasn’t one of them. It was likely what was called an independent adoption since Jo didn’t go through an agency. According to FindLaw, this type of adoption can range from $ 8,000 to $ 40,000. Assuming Luna’s adoption was somewhere in between, it makes sense that Jo had to sell her shares to pay a lawyer.

CONNECTED: The promo trailer for ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ season 17, episode 16 teases big up-front changes

Greater than cash wanted to repair issues at Division of Veterans Affairs

Seven years of exposed problems in Bay Area VAs

Craig Patrick reports

The Biden government wants to increase the funds for Veterans‘Health care. President Biden is proposing an additional $ 8.5 billion for veterans next year, on top of $ 18 billion to improve VA medical centers in his infrastructure plan.

However, the Department of Veterans Affairs has faced a number of challenges that money alone cannot solve.

One of the most common complaints from veterans is that their services are wrongly denied and they have to wait months of years for their appeal.

For example, a month after being diagnosed with terminal cancer, the VA denied Keith Brown’s claim and after months of back and forth approved his services six days before his death.

MORE: Agent Orange and Cancer: Veteran dies 1 month after VA reversed refusal to perform

Veteran denied cancer benefits until it was too late

Keith was diagnosed with terminal lung cancer in November 2018. A month later, the VA denied compensation for end-stage cancer assistance. Then, in March 2019, the VA denied that his lung cancer was even linked to his ministry after years of exposure to Agent Orange.

“He was annoyed to the extreme,” said Keith’s wife Cindy. “There has to be better, because if you wait long enough and this vet dies, you are under no obligation to make a decision or to repay the payment.”

Last year too Candi Weikert came within six days of losing her home because the VA was delaying the benefits of their survivors until FOX 13 intervened and they immediately approved it with back payment.

MORE: A year and a half later, the widow’s VA benefits finally come through

Widow finally gets VA benefits

When we met Candi Weikert in November, she was a grieving widow who had not been able to receive her VA benefits for more than a year. The bank had already planned to auction their house and they had given up hope of keeping it.

Jon Darling is a former VA insider who said he had insight into why many veteran benefits are delayed or falsely denied.

While Congress passed reforms to alleviate claims backlog, Darling said, based on his experience, policies to improve performance have failed in some cases. He said employees have an allocation of points that they need to achieve and that the points are determined by the number of claims processed statistically. While this seems like a great way to keep the process moving, Darling said in practice, it encouraged some to work too fast and make mistakes and / or increase the number of rejections. He said that a denied claim is considered a completed claim.

“If you reject a claim, you received that one number, nothing was achieved, but you received the number,” he said. “The Regional Office can summarize this as one additional point for a processed application.”

And if the veteran prevails on appeal, Darlins has increased the stats.

“We can get two points from this person,” he said.

He said the staff didn’t automatically deny claims, but he said they weren’t selected for things that disabled veterans – many of them seniors – can easily overlook. And while he said they could call the veterans and fix many of the issues, they were under pressure to limit any call, which prevents workers from calling to fix minor issues on the forms.

“I really had a stomach ache,” he said. “It wasn’t uncommon for people to send in forms for a year and a half. When I called these people, I found my car had already been taken, my house was in foreclosure, and I lost my spouse six months ago, and I am how, and we play around with your papers? “

He encouraged veterans to contact a Veterans Service Representative who can help fill out the forms for free.

“The form is extremely difficult for first-time viewers to complete. Unless they have the assistance of a knowledgeable veteran service representative or someone with experience who sees this form, there is little chance they will fill it out properly . “

The US Department of Veterans has one List of Veterans Service Officers. The National Veterans Foundation also provides a list of resources to assist you

Veteran examiners can also be reached through the Florida Department of Veterans Affairs at 727-319-7440 or by email to

For more information, visit

Allan Saint-Maximin’s change of favor will trigger issues for Arsenal

Despite yet another disappointing Premier League season, Newcastle are almost certain of relegation. Better still, if they win three of their remaining five games, Steve Bruce’s team equals 45 points won in 2017/18 and 44 points in 2016/17 if they finished tenth. It couldn’t be that bad.

Another reason for optimism ahead of Sunday’s game against Arsenal is Allan Saint-Maximin’s form since returning from injury. A match-winning performance against Burnley was followed by star turns against West Ham and Liverpool, with the winger showing an extremely effective and controversial new side of his game: he actually started passing the ball.

Saint-Maximin is unique and incredibly exciting to see … but it is a tendency to dribble, even if it isn’t the best option available, like the most annoying of five teammates. No player has attempted dribbles in the past two seasons and while it occasionally takes a ton of players to stop him, Saint-Maximin often runs so far ahead of his teammates that defenders are licensed to leave their positions to give him one To show one way road from which he cannot escape.

Saint-Maximin’s ability to dribble at 100 mph is key to getting Newcastle out of defensive form. However, if he runs 70 yards to win a throw, it is just as effective as a long kick on the ball.

However, this season’s data shows not only that it is easy to see on the pitch, but also that Saint-Maximin’s game has changed slightly. His 46.7 touches per game and 20.7 passes per game in 2019/20 are now 47.7 touches and 22.81 passes with fewer dribbles. He also makes fewer shots and crosses, but that matches his chances per 90 in open play and improves from 1.54 to 1.93. For context, Bukayo Saka has created 1.01 chances per 90 this season. Saint-Maximin has slowed down from time to time and has become a more powerful offensive weapon.

Adama Traore and Christian Pulisic are the most similar in terms of style, but both created fewer chances (1.87 and 1.31, respectively) by having a lot more crosses. This is how Saint-Maximin Traore measures:

Pricey Abby: Household cash issues could maintain daughter out of the school of her goals

DEAR ABBY: My daughter was accepted into a college of her choice in Pennsylvania that had a lot of scholarships. Our payout is roughly $ 6,000 if she gets a Stafford loan or works this summer to help with the $ 4,500 that the loan would be. My husband insists on community college she doesn’t want to go to. He constantly cites the fact that our house is under foreclosure and that he owes the IRS money for his business, which is why things cannot be.

I think our children should be able to do things when they are functional. I encouraged all of them during school to do their best and follow their dreams. My husband didn’t offer help with homework or anything else. All the compliments they received for extracurricular commitment and excellent grades, he would always say that it was me – and rightly so, but it was them too.

Our firstborn wanted to go to a certain college by the way, but his father convinced him to go to community college by promising that he would pay for it and get him a car. He never taught the poor kid to drive. I offered professional driving lessons, but my son refused.

Now my husband is using the same tactic on my daughter. Should I send her to pursue her dreams against his will? You cannot suppress it forever. – ENCOURAGE MOTHER IN NEW YORK

DEAR MOM: With the house in foreclosure and the money owed to the IRS, your husband is right to be concerned. Sometimes the best plans go wrong because of circumstances beyond our control, particularly the volatile business climate we have experienced.

Even so, I think you may be overdue to have an open conversation with your daughter about what she might need to do to complement the scholarships offered by the college of her choice. When she is ready to work through the summer and possibly beyond – and is considering taking out a student loan of her own – she should be given the opportunity to live her dream.

DEAR ABBY: My husband and I have been together for 15 years. We used to be inseparable. He was my best friend.

We have rarely spent time together since our daughter was born nine years ago. Most of his free time he spends woodworking in the basement. I spend my time upstairs or outside. I don’t think he enjoys my company any more.

I told him this, and he says it wasn’t intentional, and he loves me now more than ever. But to me it feels like we’re growing apart and I’m very lonely. Because my daughter is the one I spend most of the time with, she is the one who suffers from my moods when I am sad and upset about him. What can we do to be friends again instead of just parents? – It is missing in OHIO

LOVE MISSING: Explain to your husband that you are lonely and need more from him than you have had since your daughter was born. Start by exploring childcare options, then plan some adult-only dates for the two of you. This works for a lot of other couples and can help both of you renew the excitement that was there when you were child free.

Dear Abby was written by Abigail Van Buren, also known as Jeanne Phillips, and founded by her mother Pauline Phillips. Contact love abby beneath or P.O. Box 69440, Los Angeles, CA 90069.

Katie Cullum: Ideas for avoiding cash issues | Neighborhood

Are you worried about money? Do you and your family argue about money?

Money is a common problem for a family regardless of the income, age or education of the family members. Sometimes a lack of income to meet basic needs leads to money problems. In most cases, poor communication about money is at the root of financial problems.

Like me, you may have grown up in a household where money wasn’t talked about much. Or maybe you grew up in a household where a shared conversation was about how much someone made that week and how they would spend their paycheck.

If family members have different values ​​and attitudes towards spending and saving money or if families strive for unrealistic goals, there is potential for conflict! And no matter how much money it costs – everything makes a difference.

Perhaps one spouse will happily buy 3 or 4 soft drinks a day while the other knows how to save money with coupons. Or maybe one spouse enjoys hunting (and buying guns, camouflage paint, a four-wheeler, trailer, and other “stuff”) and the other saves and saves their dime to buy a new suit at a consignment store. If family members don’t “talk”, even the best spending plan may not work.

Preventing and overcoming money problems requires honest and honest communication. It also takes time and effort. If you are fortunate enough to have a little “extra” cash from stimulus checks, you may have a hard time deciding how to wisely use that extra cash.

Change, confusion and conflict are a normal part of everyone’s life. Changes in employment patterns or new ways of generating income have led us to rethink how we earn and how we spend. It is easy for family members to be guided by news from the world around them (new cars, new houses, better “things”, etc.). Often times this can lead to a loss of knowledge about what is really important for each individual and for the whole family.

Anticipating and handling change, good or bad, as it will affect the way money is used, is a challenging aspect of financial management. The most basic rule is to live within your income. When your income takes a leap, reduce your expenses. As your income increases, you have more choices! If you have more, it is highly recommended that you save 3-6 months to take away as a “safety net” if you haven’t already. Then you can start saving up for other dreams and goals, like a long cruise or even an investment in the stock market.

But if your family disagrees on money issues, you may have a hard time doing something. When discussing money with a spouse or other family member, ask the following questions:

  • How do you feel about the way your family communicates about money?
  • Share your “ideal”. How do you want your situation to be?
  • Identify where you need help. Do you agree or disagree with the need for help?
  • What resources are available to you?
  • Can you talk to someone else about their financial mistakes (e.g. overspending, making big purchases without you)?
  • Can you talk about potential money problems before they arise?

Making financial decisions is a challenge for every family. If you’re having trouble making decisions, these steps can help you find an acceptable solution for everyone involved.

Step 1: define the problem. Be precise. List only one problem at a time (try not to bring up the _____ incident from 3 years ago).

Step 2: Name ways in which the problem can be solved. Write down all the possible solutions that come to mind. Don’t judge their worth at this point (don’t make quick judgments).

Step 3: Now evaluate each of the solutions listed in Step 2. Are they workable, practical, and acceptable to everyone involved? Can you combine several alternatives?

Step 4: choose a solution. Describe the steps required to arrive at this solution.

Step 5: What could be getting in the way of achieving your goal? How can you avoid these obstacles? What are you willing to sacrifice to solve this problem? Whose support do you need?

Check out my blog – Little Steps to Healthy Habits – and check out the Kids and Money franchise. Learn tips on how to talk about money with your kids, including downloadable parenting guides. If you are struggling with money, don’t hesitate to give me a call. I have a great handout on family communication about money that can get you started. We also have publications on Shape Up Your Spending and Achieving Financial Goals.

Katie Cullum is a County Extension Agent – Family and Consumer Science for the White County Cooperative Extension Service. You can email at or called at (501) 268-5394. visit for more informations.

Is Your ‘Attachment Fashion’ Inflicting Your Relationship Issues?

The way we were raised affects our ability to maintain healthy relationships. This particular can of worms is addressed in all kinds of self-help and mental health practices, but what you’ve probably heard most of lately is something called “attachment theory.”

Attachment theory is not new, but has gained attention in recent years to analyze and define relationships. in the a column For the Washington Post solo series, writer Jenna Birch says she recently looked at the book Attached: The New Science of Adult Attachment and How It Can Help You Find and Keep Love after a failed relationship and it has done wonders in the way she thinks about dating.

Authors Amir Levine and Rachel Heller based their book on the idea that all infants are born with an innate desire to bond with someone, and how that desire is supported or thwarted by our parents helps determine how we try ( or avoid) becoming attached to other adults. It’s clear why these theories are popular: because they can make a test that will tell you about you.

Attached assumes four main categories of attachment outcomes. The idea is that whoever you fall into could help explain how you approach close relationships. The investment styles are structured as follows:

  • To back up: Fortunately, safe people should make up around 50 percent of the population. If they didn’t, humanity could end. Generally speaking, if you’re safe, it suggests that you’ve had responsive caregivers who made the breakup seem less scary. These people don’t avoid intimacy and are less concerned about relationships, probably because they haven’t had as many bad experiences with them. Happy.
  • Scared: According to Affiliated, anxious people make up about 20 percent of the population. Fearful people are very comfortable with intimacy – so comfortable in fact that when you pull away to reach for the remote, they’ll basically sit on your lap wondering if you’ve fallen in love with them. They need a lot of security because they likely had caregivers who were unable to meet their needs. They are also extremely sensitive and overconscious when problems arise.
  • Avoidance: Avoidant people reportedly respond to a “freestanding caregiver” who becomes incredibly independent and generally uncomfortable with intimacy. Enclosed says they make up roughly 25 percent of the population and you dated them all in college.
  • “Disorganized”: Sometimes referred to as “fearful” or “fearful and avoidant,” about five percent of the population is said to have some kind of exciting mix of attachment styles. A real roller coaster of love.

Limitations of Attachment Theory

There is a lot of criticism of attachment theory as four categories hardly seem enough to cover all of humanity’s many weaknesses. In 2016, psychologist and sex therapist Michael Aaron wrote For psychology today, this attachment theory is too simple:

… Attachment theory seems to have assumed that attachment is a kind of monolithic relational mind map that applies globally, but recent research shows that individuals can be attached to different people in different ways. Indeed, the child may have a secure bond with his mother, but an avoidant bond with his father and a fearful bond with an aunt, etc.

He also suggests that the theory be used to induce people to conform to a certain idea of ​​”normal” relationships, saying that it imposes “arbitrary, moralistic societal standards for relational and sexual desires”.

It’s an interesting point: for example, is the only kind of healthy relationship monogamous? Is there something wrong with you if you don’t want to settle down the “normal” way? Attachment theory seems to imply that there is one single way we should all try and if we don’t, it is more due to a flaw in our upbringing than to being more open about love and relationships.

What to say to an angry person instead of calming down?

Anger is an ironic state, and in a fit of frustration or anger, the last thing you want to say to someone is to “calm down”. If someone is seething, this is the worst advice, even if it is the only thing they have to do to process things more clearly.

Continue reading

How attachment theory can help

Still, having a basic idea of ​​your tendencies could be a potentially helpful guide, even if you don’t like where you fall on the axis of attachment. First, most people are a mix of different behaviors, and you should try not to view any of the categories as inherently negative. For example, an anxious person may be more sensitive to problems early on and therefore address them. An avoidant may be good at finding a way out of difficult problems and will not be too demanding. What really matters is what type of person your particular traits work best with.

Realizing she was a fearful person, Birch realized that she needed to be with someone who was safe and who didn’t respond to her need for affection with more distance or disdain. While two people can date each other with insecurities, sometimes it can be safer to be in a relationship with a safe person because you are practicing being with someone who is more reliable. Even if it doesn’t work out, these are lessons you will have learned for your next relationship.

Journalist and author of The Attachment Effect: Exploring the Powerful Paths Our earliest attachment shapes our relationships and our livesPeter Lovenheim also told Birch that figuring out this material might clarify why certain relationships didn’t work out and others:

Learning your attachment style can be empowering. It’s hard when you go through life anxiously and don’t know it. For example, you will not understand the conflicts and frustrations in your relationships. When you learn attachment, you may think, “Oh, that’s my style of attachment,” when something triggers you. You may even think, “I don’t have to react like this” and change your behavior.

Basically, Lovenheim and the attachment theory movement still seem to encourage people to think about their behavior and what they can change, regardless of what happened in the past.

This story was originally published in August 2018 and was updated on February 26, 2021 to be in line with Lifehacker style guidelines.