World watchdog urges Japan to spice up struggle in opposition to money-laundering | WTVB | 1590 AM · 95.5 FM

Global watchdog calls on Japan to step up the fight against money laundering | WTVB | 1590 AM · 95.5 FM | Branch County’s voice


For the health and safety of all, our offices are temporarily closed to the public. If you have won a prize from us, we will send it to you or contact you with the specific information required to redeem your prize. If you have any questions, please feel free to call us during business hours on working days at (517) 279-1590.

Govt Arrested and Charged for Bribery and Cash-Laundering Scheme | OPA

A South Florida resident was arrested yesterday in Miami for his alleged role in a scheme to bribe Venezuelan officials and laundering money to obtain contracts from Venezuela’s state and state-controlled energy company Petróleos de Venezuela SA (PDVSA), and Venezuela’s state and state-controlled food company who bought groceries for Venezuela, Corporación de Abastecimiento y Servicios Agrícola (CASA).

According to court documents, Naman Wakil, 59, of Miami, a Syrian national and legal permanent resident in the US from 2010 through at least September 2017, conspired with others to seek bribes to CASA officials and officials in joint ventures between PDVSA and. various foreign companies in Venezuela’s oil-rich Orinoco belt. Wakil allegedly paid these bribes to obtain contracts to sell food to CASA for at least $ 250 million and to do business with the PDVSA joint ventures, including receiving grossly inflated contracts (worth at least $ 30 million) to provide goods and services for the PDVSA joint ventures. Wakil laundered funds related to the bribery program to and from bank accounts in South Florida, including the purchase of 10 South Florida residential units, a $ 3.5 million airplane and a $ 1.5 million yacht. Wakil also used part of the funds to make payments to or for the benefit of Venezuelan officials.

Wakil is charged with three counts of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), violate the FCPA, conspiracy to commit money laundering, international advertising money laundering, and involvement in criminally derived property transactions. If convicted, Wakil faces a maximum sentence of 80 years in prison. A federal district court judge will determine each sentence based on U.S. sentencing guidelines and other legal factors.

Wakil made his first appearance in federal court at 1:30 p.m. today before US judge Lauren Louis in Miami.

Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite Jr. of the Department of Justice’s Department of Criminal Investigation, Acting U.S. Attorney Juan Antonio Gonzalez for the Southern District of Florida, Special Agent in charge Anthony Salisbury of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Miami Field Office, and Acting Special Agent in charge Tyler R. Hatcher of the IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) Miami Field Office made the announcement.

Trial Attorney Alexander Kramer of the Department of Justice Fraud and U.S. Assistant Attorney Michael Berger of the Southern District of Florida are pursuing the case.

The criminal fraud department is responsible for investigating and prosecuting all FCPA matters. For more information on the Department of Justice’s FCPA enforcement efforts, please visit

An indictment is just an accusation, and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

S.I. man charged in main money-laundering scheme for drug traffickers. Over $28 million modified arms, say feds.

STATEN ISLAND, NY – A Staten Island man played a key role in a ring that laundered over $ 28 million for drug trafficking organizations in the United States and Mexico, authorities claim.

Dielong Wu, 58, was among seven defendants, officials said.

He was the only defendant in the county.

Five defendants, including alleged ringleader Ying Sun, 65, are from California. The remaining suspect is from Queens.

Authorities said Sun led the group for about a year and a half from November 2019 to May 2021.

During that time, he received large sums of money that were laundered by drug dealers in the United States and Mexico, officials said.

From April 2020 to April 2021 alone, Sun arranged more than 130 cash pickups in 23 states, with drug trafficking revenues totaling over $ 20 million, authorities said.

Wu and the five other defendants took the money, then transported it and deposited it with private banks, officials said. In some cases, they transferred the money to different people or institutions, the authorities said.

According to an indictment, Wu made 11 cash withdrawals for over $ 1 million between April 28 and May 4 last year.

Sun arranged the pickups in and around Staten Island, the Bronx and Philadelphia, the indictment states.

On May 4, Wu Jie Lin, 58, handed a co-defendant a bag of cash in or around Mount Laurel, NJ, the indictment said.

After that, the authorities confiscated about US $ 300,000 from Lin and one other person when they tried to deposit the money with a retail bank, the indictment said.

During the investigation, authorities confiscated over $ 6.5 million from the group of defendants, officials said.

Authorities said they secured an additional $ 8 million in assets attributable to illicit revenue laundered from the ring.

Six of the defendants, including Wu, were charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering and conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transfer business.

The charges are subject to maximum sentences of 20 years and five years behind bars.

Wu was arrested Wednesday and remains vacant on a $ 250,000 bond, online court records show. His community was not immediately available.

He was charged in federal court in Manhattan.

“Mr. Wu has made a plea not guilty and as such we intend to fight these allegations aggressively,” said Xavier Donaldson, the defendant’s attorney.

The arrests were announced by Ray Donovan, Special Envoy for the New York Department of the Federal Drug Administration, and Audrey Strauss, US attorney for the New York Southern District.

“One of the most powerful criminal elements in transnational drug trafficking organizations is money laundering,” Donovan said in a statement. “As with any business, the ultimate goal of drug trafficking is profit. These money laundering networks provide human traffickers with an invaluable service by transferring their ill-gotten gains around the world. “

Balkan money-laundering is booming | The Economist

May 22, 2021

ÖOn May 12, prosecutors in northern Macedonia accused Nikola Gruevski, the country’s former prime minister, of money laundering. He is believed to have channeled cash donated to his party through Belize to illegally buy property and hide its property. He says the case is politically motivated. In Jahorina, a popular Bosnian ski resort, gangsters and the officials they corrupt have now invested in hotels. All types of corruption are widespread. An expatriate who half-built a block of flats near his home in Vlorë, southern Albania, grumbles that the building stalled because he refused to pay bribes to get the necessary permits.

Listen to this story

Your browser doesn’t support this

Enjoy more audio and podcasts on iOS or Android.

All over the Balkans, dirty money is laundering through real estate, the market is distorted and prices are rising – much to the ire of common house hunters. Sophisticated new towers are rising in Tirana, Pristina and Belgrade. Although the economy in the Balkans has been badly hit by Covid-19, property prices in parts of the region have defied gravity. In Tirana they have more than doubled since 2017. Across Albania, the value of real estate transactions increased by 6.7% in 2020.

The money laundering of drugs, which has been booming in recent years, particularly through cocaine trafficking, is one reason for rising prices, according to a new report by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, an international network of crime specialists. Another reason is that crooked officials have to invest their money. All Balkan countries have solid money laundering laws, but enforcement is patchy.

In the last decade, criminal syndicates in the Balkans have outgrown their small home countries. They now earn a lot of their money abroad. Therefore, according to the report, a large part of their profits are also invested abroad. But they are still investing at home. Fatjona Mejdini, who helped research the report, says the Balkan governments are ambivalent about money laundering. They want to take action, but at the same time welcome the jobs and investments they can bring. The gangsters who make grueling money are conservative when it comes to investing it. They “have no imagination,” Ms. Mejdini says, which is why they prefer bricks and mortar to the many other types of shops that could wash their loot.

This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the heading “Hide”

Tilting the scales – A Swiss money-laundering probe raises disturbing questions | Finance & economics

Jan 23rd 2021

IN 2014 SWITZERLAND’S then attorney-general and two colleagues posed for a photo with several other people on a boat on Lake Baikal in Siberia. The picture shows the men relaxing together on the deck. But their host was no ordinary sailor. He was one of Russia’s top prosecutors, later implicated in efforts to stymie a major international money-laundering case that his very guests were investigating.

The story behind the photograph involves an intriguing cast. It includes the Russian lawyer who met President Donald Trump’s campaign team in 2016, an encounter that featured in the Mueller report into Russian interference in that year’s election. Another starring character has been linked to corruption investigations at FIFA, world football’s governing body. The money-laundering case, and allegations of cosy relations between Swiss law enforcers and Russian counterparts, threaten to make a mockery of the Alpine country’s efforts to shed its global reputation as the home for shady people’s cash.

At the heart of it all is the loot from the so-called Magnitsky case. In 2009 Sergei Magnitsky, a lawyer, died in a Russian prison after trying to investigate a fraud in which Russian officials and police officers, with the connivance of the courts, purloined a $230m tax refund for an investment firm, Hermitage Capital Management. Bill Browder, the firm’s founder and Magnitsky’s employer, has worked since to expose the scam. His lobbying has led several countries, including America and Britain, to pass “Magnitsky laws” that sanction foreign officials who commit human-rights abuses or steal money. An EU-wide version was adopted on December 7th.

Mr Browder’s team has tracked the money from the fraud to 26 countries, including Switzerland. Around $11m in Credit Suisse has been tied to Vladlen Stepanov, the husband of the official who approved the bogus tax refund. The couple have been hit with American sanctions. An undisclosed sum in UBS, another bank, was linked to Dmitry Klyuev, a Russian businessman also subject to sanctions. And over $7m in UBS was held by Denis Katsyv, another business figure, and firms linked to him. In 2017 one of the firms, Prevezon, agreed to pay $5.9m, without admitting guilt, to settle a US government asset-forfeiture suit over the case.

The Russians have all said the money in their accounts is unrelated to the alleged fraud and deny wrongdoing. But Mr Browder disagreed. In 2011 Hermitage filed a criminal complaint over the $230m theft with Swiss prosecutors. They launched a probe and froze the accounts. But despite progress in related probes elsewhere and plenty of evidence joining the dots, there have been no indictments or seizures. In November the Swiss prosecutor’s office said it planned to close the investigation and release most of the money in the accounts to their Russian owners. It also signalled that it may remove Hermitage as a plaintiff following a legal challenge, which The Economist understands to be from Prevezon. That would leave Hermitage unable to appeal the decision to drop the probe.

The Swiss have “capitulated” in the face of Russian efforts to sabotage the case, complains Mr Browder. He is not alone. Several Swiss politicians have raised the issue in parliament. A group of 20 lawmakers from several European countries signed a declaration bemoaning the reported closeness of Swiss investigators to Russia in the Magnitsky case. In December an American senator, Roger Wicker, wrote to Mike Pompeo to urge the secretary of state “to ensure that mutual legal assistance work with Switzerland does not inadvertently become a vector for Russian influence”.

The Swiss officials in the case all deny any bias. The attorney-general’s office says that the link between sums suspected of being laundered in Switzerland and an offence committed abroad “must be established with a sufficient degree of certainty”, and that it was “justified” in closing the case after conducting a thorough investigation. However, documents seen by The Economist, including court records, raise disturbing questions about the integrity of the Swiss probe.

By 2013 there were three Swiss officials involved in the investigation. Patrick Lamon had just taken over as lead prosecutor. At around the same time, a police officer with expertise in Russia, “Viktor K”, was seconded to the prosecutor’s office to assist with the case. (The Economist cannot publish his real name without falling foul of Swiss law, which shields individuals who are not publicly known figures, including those convicted of crimes, from having their identities revealed.) Michael Lauber, Switzerland’s attorney-general, oversaw their work. What followed was not exactly an arm’s length investigation.

Boars, bears and choppers

In 2014 Viktor K went on a boar-hunting trip with a Russian prosecutor, Saak Karapetyan. According to court documents, they stayed at a lodge in the Yaroslavl region, 320km from Moscow, and the tab was picked up by an oligarch involved in energy and property. That summer all three Swiss men schmoozed with Mr Karapetyan on Lake Baikal. The Russians paid for the boat trip. In September 2015 Mr Lamon and K travelled from Zurich to Moscow on a plane owned by the Russian state, at the invitation of the prosecutor-general. Some of the expenses were paid by the Russians. K stayed on for another hunting trip with Mr Karapetyan. (K did not respond to questions from The Economist.)

Who was this hospitable Russian prosecutor? Evidence has emerged that Mr Karapetyan may have played a key role in covering up the $230m fraud. In 2014 he sent a letter to America’s Department of Justice refusing help in the Prevezon case and insisting that the company and its owner were innocent. Mr Karapetyan, who died in a helicopter crash in 2018, had accused Mr Browder of being behind the heist.

Intriguingly, a DoJ investigation concluded that the letter had been drafted with help from a lawyer advising Prevezon, Natalia Veselnitskaya. The DoJ has charged her with obstruction of justice in connection with its case against Prevezon. She is also known for meeting senior figures from Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, at Trump Tower in June 2016. Team Trump had been led to believe it might get hold of dirt on Hillary Clinton. Instead, according to several participants, Ms Veselnitskaya turned the conversation to the Magnitsky Act, which she had been lobbying to have repealed.

In that same year Hermitage filed a request to indict Mr Stepanov, who, it argued, could not adequately explain the lawful origin of the funds in his Swiss account. Four months later Mr Lamon turned down the request, citing insufficient grounds for indictment. (Hermitage later tried to have him recused for bias, but a court rejected the request.) In August 2016 K saw Mr Karapetyan again. This time they went bear-hunting in far-eastern Russia, where they were taken by helicopter to a lodge owned by another oligarch. The two men discussed the Magnitsky case for several hours, according to K’s statement.

On his return to Switzerland the policeman requested a meeting with Andreas Gross, a Swiss politician who had written a report on the Magnitsky case for the Council of Europe, accusing Russia of “a massive cover-up”. Later, K told a court: “My task was to show that the report does not constitute the absolute truth, that nothing has been verified, and that it is just Browder’s version…I told Lamon that we must discontinue the investigation immediately.” Mr Gross says of his meeting with K: “I agreed to go because I thought he wanted my help. But it turned into an interrogation that lasted all day. It felt like he was a Russian investigator, not a Swiss one.” Mr Browder claims that K wanted to discredit the report in order to close the Swiss case.

Soon afterwards, Mr Karapetyan asked K to come to Moscow to discuss a “confidential” matter. K asked his supervisor in the police if he could make the trip. The request was denied—but he went anyway. According to court documents, he used his diplomatic passport without permission. He paid for his flights, but the cost of his stay in Moscow was covered by the Russians. While there, “he was invited to discuss some problems in the jointly processed cases,” according to a Swiss court ruling from 2018. It describes his Russian host organising a meeting with the female lawyer of a defendant in the Magnitsky case, “without him [K] knowing anything beforehand”. The lawyer is believed to have been Ms Veselnitskaya, the anti-Magnitsky lobbyist in the Trump Tower meeting.

The hunter is hunted

Back in Switzerland K’s bosses were reportedly livid about his trip. On his return, the police filed a criminal complaint against him for four offences, including the abuse of office and bribery. But in January 2019 Mr Lauber’s office dropped the charges for a lighter one, “acceptance of advantage”. This carried a maximum three-year sentence.

Viktor K lost his job, in part because of the unauthorised trip, and was convicted over his bear-hunting excursion. Yet there was no jail time. He did not even have to pay a fine: a SFr9,000 ($8,950) penalty was quashed on appeal—a ruling which, according to the court, was aimed at “facilitating his…reinsertion” back into his profession. That was not the only thing about the courts’ treatment of the policeman that struck some as unduly lenient. His conviction was expunged from the criminal record. Three-quarters of his lawyer’s fees were reimbursed by the state. He was acquitted over the two other trips on the grounds that any bribery would have taken place in Russia, not Switzerland—even though Swiss law covers offences that affect an official’s work in his own country, which this appeared to do. The attorney-general’s office did not appeal this ruling.

At the same time, according to the transcript of a hearing in June 2019, Russian officials singled out K for praise. The prosecutor-general said his “activity…has significantly contributed to the collaboration of the Russian and Swiss authorities”.

Mr Lauber stirred further controversy last year. The Financial Times, citing letters sent by his office to Swiss lawyers, reported that he planned to share sensitive testimony relating to the Magnitsky case with Russian counterparts. His office declined to confirm this. Mr Browder says the letters are authentic. The decision to transfer the information angered many politicians in Europe and America, since it contravenes guidance from Interpol and the Council of Europe, of which Switzerland is a member.

As things stand, most of the frozen money in UBS and Credit Suisse will go back to the account-holders. The remainder—as little as $1.1m—covers the amount deemed to be provably illicit. But how the Swiss attorney-general’s office calculated this has raised yet more eyebrows. It chose to use a “proportional” method, under which the share of money counted as tainted is heavily diluted if—as happened in this case—it is commingled with other funds while being moved around.

This approach runs counter to a UN convention on organised crime, which allows far more money to be seized, even if it is mixed with other funds. It also goes against common practice, including that in Switzerland, says Mark Pieth, an expert who helped write the country’s anti-money-laundering laws. “The theory they applied is just wrong,” he says. “It’s an argument you’d expect a desperate defence lawyer to use, rather than a prosecutor obliged to follow the money. To my eyes it looks like they were working against their own interests. It’s weird.” The attorney-general’s office says the stingy methodology reflects the “link [that] can be established between the assets seized in Switzerland and the predicate offence committed in Russia”.

Mr Browder has threatened to sue the two Swiss banks for breaching American sanctions if they unfreeze the accounts. (Both banks say they do not comment on existing or potential client relationships but are committed to complying with all applicable laws and regulations.) He is expected to mount a legal challenge in the next few weeks.

Mr Lauber is no longer overseeing the case. He stepped down as attorney-general in August, after a court found he had covered up a meeting with Gianni Infantino, head of FIFA, and lied to supervisors while his office probed corruption at the organisation. The Swiss parliament has waived his immunity in the case, paving the way for criminal proceedings against him. Mr Lauber has denied wrongdoing. He declined to answer questions from The Economist, citing the fact that he was no longer attorney-general. The FIFA and Magnitsky cases suggest that the Swiss federal criminal-law system is “in deep trouble”, says Mr Pieth. In both, he says, prosecutors were unprofessionally close to third parties. Crucially, key meetings went unrecorded.

The tale of Russian money and cosy official links does not paint a flattering portrait of Switzerland, home to two big financial centres, Geneva and Zurich, and the largest market for offshore private wealth. There is no doubt the country has become less welcoming to dirty money over the past decade, including national wealth looted by kleptocrats. It is also more willing to help other Western governments pursue tax-dodgers, even handing over account data once deemed sacrosanct under its secrecy law. Yet the Magnitsky case undermines this tentative progress. Mr Browder goes further. The public evidence, he argues, points to conduct by Swiss officials that “strongly suggests something untoward is going on”. “This is not something anyone should expect from the Swiss. It makes them look like a banana republic.”

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline “Tilting the scales”

Reuse this contentThe Trust Project

Swiss open money-laundering probe of Lebanon’s central financial institution | Enterprise and Financial system Information

The investigation is the latest blow of confidence for Lebanon’s crippled financial system.

Beirut, Lebanon – The Swiss authorities have asked the Lebanese judiciary to cooperate in a money laundering investigation by the country’s central bank in order to treat the bankrupt financial institution and its depressed governor with the latest loss of confidence.

The investigation focuses on $ 400 million in remittances allegedly tied to the bank’s 27-year-old governor, Riad Salameh, his brother Raja, and Salameh’s adviser Marianne Al-Hoayek, a court source told Al Jazeera. Institutions in which the bank has a large stake – including Middle East Airlines and the Casino du Liban – are also being scrutinized, the source said.

Salameh issued a statement denying any wrongdoing and dismissing overseas broadcast reports from him, his brother or his advisor as “falsifications and false news.” He threatened legal action against anyone who publishes the information in order to damage his reputation.

The Swiss Public Prosecutor’s Office did not immediately respond to Al Jazeera’s request for comment. Officials from the Swiss embassy in Beirut referred Al Jazeera to the public prosecutor. The outgoing Lebanese Justice Minister also did not respond to a request for comment.

Reuters news agency quoted the Swiss Attorney General as saying it had asked Lebanon for legal assistance as part of an investigation into “increased money laundering” and possible embezzlement of the Lebanese central bank, formerly known as Banque du Liban.

It wasn’t immediately clear whether Salameh was a suspect.

Tuesday’s news only deepens Salameh’s spectacular crash since late 2019, when Lebanon plunged into its deepest economic crisis since its 1975-1990 civil war. The Lebanese currency has since lost more than 80 percent of its value against the US dollar, and more than half of the population now lives in poverty.

Salameh has previously received numerous international bank awards and is a serious candidate for the country’s presidency. Since then, he has been targeted by anti-government demonstrators who, along with top politicians, blame him for the country’s financial collapse.

Meanwhile, the international community has made much-needed aid to Lebanon conditional on a forensic review by the central bank, which Salameh has been running since 1993.

The Swiss probe could still encounter obstacles in Lebanon. The court source said prosecutor Ghassan Khoury, who received the Swiss request, found a lack of evidence or evidence to justify the “detailed questions” the Swiss authorities are trying to ask Salameh and others.

Khoury could request more information before deciding whether to comply, the source said, noting that in 2020 Lebanon asked Swiss authorities for help with an investigation of an estimated US $ 2.4 billion that was made in the Protests of 2019 – transfers that circumvent unofficial capital controls were transferred outside the country.

Lebanon received no response at the time, the source said.