Phoenix boys shut out common season in fashion – Medford Information, Climate, Sports activities, Breaking Information

Pirates in fourth place defeated the Skyline Conference champion and third-placed Henley 2-0 to move into the playoffs of the states with a lot of momentum

PHOENIX – In the past few weeks, Phoenix head coach Chris Gallegos has been feeling better and better about the way his team plays.

The progress that the pirates have made could be seen on Monday evening.

In a fight between two of the top teams in Class 4A, the goals of the seniors Victor Martinez and Jorge Mejia in the second half as well as a strong defensive performance of No. 4 in Phoenix brought a 2-0 win against third-placed Henley in the final of the regular season for both teams at PT Rising Field.

“The way things went and things built up, we played better,” said Gallegos. “Everyone came together and it was building block, building block, building block.

“This is what we needed to prepare for the playoffs, so that’s what we set out to do. Henley is a phenomenal team, we knew it was going to be close so this will be the perfect game to help us get into the playoffs. “

When these two teams met for the first time on October 6th in Klamath Falls, Henley – who won the Skyline Conference title with a win over Klamath Union last Friday and snapped Phoenix’s five-year run at the top of the table – scored a 6-2. Victory, a game Gallegos knew things just totally got away from his team.

On Monday evening, however, things looked very different for the Pirates (12: 2, 8: 2 skyline).

Not only did Phoenix take the win and a bit of revenge on Henley (11-3-1, 9-1), the Pirates limited the Hornets to a total of eight shots throughout the game.

“We had to clean up a few things defensively,” said Gallegos. “As soon as we did that, it started to click. The guys start to click and they really just collapse. We are going in the right direction. … I have a great back line right now and they do a great job. Defense wins championships, and they do. Sergio (Alegria) showed a phenomenal game and really improved. He was just a great leader for us back there. “

The first half ended goalless, although Phoenix left Henley 9-3. The Pirates’ best chance in the first half had seven minutes before half-time when Cielo Marlia-Larsen sent a cross towards the rear post from the right. Caden Gallegos made the run into the 6-yard box, but his attempt to slip just failed.

The Pirates’ fate changed in less than six minutes in the second half when Martinez, reigning Skyline Player of the Year, attempted to split a pair of defenders right in the box. The center referee ruled that a foul had been committed, which gave Phoenix the penalty and a chance to get in front.

Martinez had no problems with that, sending Henley keeper Andrew Edwards in the wrong direction and sinking his shot into the net to the left. I

It was the first goal Henley – who entered the game on Monday night with a four-game winning streak – had allowed in a 3-2 loss to McLoughlin since October 9.

The Pirates doubled their lead in the 62nd minute, Martinez re-initiated the action that led to the goal. Martinez gave the defender a deft move, marking him as he spun with the ball, but saw his shot blocked. Before the ball could land, Caden Gallegos attempted a volley in the direction of the goal, but that too was blocked. The second ricochet landed at the feet of Mejia, who had time to control the ball at the back post and shoot it home to give Phoenix a 2-0 lead.

Less than three minutes later, Henley had his best chance of the evening, but Phoenix keeper Tucker Speaks’ double save – the first to come after a looping shot he dumped on the crossbar – kept the Hornets off the scoreboard.

It allowed Speaks and the rest of the Phoenix defense to post their fourth shutout in their last five games.

“We did a good job and much better than there,” said Alegria. “When we were over there, (the defenders) decided to move up because we weren’t scoring enough goals. We should have just stayed behind the whole time. … We really wanted (the shutout) because we gave everything. Mentally we weren’t there for the game that was played 6-2 (against Henley), but this is our home here and we did what we do at home – and that’s the win. “

Speaks, another of Phoenix’s nine seniors, finished with four saves while Edwards made five stops.

As a team, the Pirates outperformed the Hornets 17-8.

“The playoffs are just around the corner and we’re trying to get better, we’re trying to improve,” said Alegria. “We’re trying to win.”


HENLEY 6, PHOENIX 2: At Klamath Falls, Phoenix fell behind early and was never able to recover in the final of the regular season against a Henley squad that finished second in the postseason.

After the Hornets (9-4, 7-3 Skyline) with goals in the 12th 20th minute after a pass from junior Sofia Rodriguez.

After a goal by Henley at the beginning of the second half, Phoenix senior Maddy Mayer hit with a PK after 46 minutes to reduce the Hornets’ lead to 4-2.

Junior Morgan James played well in midfield, winning 50/50 balls and creating opportunities for the Pirates in the transition period.

Reach reporter Danny Penza at 541-776-4469 or Follow him on Twitter @penzatopaper.

Phoenix’s Caden Gallegos (2) hits Henley defenseman Eli Hayes to the ball in the first half of Monday night’s game. Photo by Denise Baratta

Phoenix’s Victor Martinez, right, hits Henley’s Trevor Tobiasson to the ball for a shot on goal in the first half of the game on Monday night. Photo by Denise Baratta

Victor Martinez shoots on goal under pressure from Henley’s Lello Squera in the first half of Monday night’s game. Photo by Denise Baratta

Phoenix’s Jenner Seldon (5) and Henley’s Jeshua Ruelas (17) will fight for first place at a loose ball in the first half of the game on Monday night. Photo by Denise Baratta

Cash in Oregon politics as unchecked as ever – Medford Information, Climate, Sports activities, Breaking Information

The strongest belief that pulled me back into politics three years ago is this: We won’t make much headway to solving Oregon’s core problems until we drastically reduce the power of big money in Salem.

It wasn’t difficult for the voters to do. Donald Trump had a line of applause in 2016 that was true for everyone who heard it: the system is rigged.

I heard it over and over two years later on my own campaign path. Pretty much everyone I’ve spoken to, from left to right, nodded or shook hands as I put campaign finance reform high on my election agenda.

That momentum helped get me into the Senate and got President Peter Courtney to hand me the gavel of a brand new campaign finance committee. There we passed SJR 18, which referred measure 107 to the voters. It called on Oregonians to clarify the state’s constitutional language and let us know if they wanted to authorize state and local governments to regulate campaign funding.

What they – you – replied by a whopping 4-1 gap last November was YES.

Great – you gave us clear marching orders to take the campaign fund limit seriously.

I went to the 2021 session on SB 336, my proposal for Campaign Finance Reform (CFR), and two other lawmakers brought theirs. This would be the year for CFR in Oregon!

Well, today I sent out my newsletter at the end of the session with a summary of the legislative achievements. We actually did some valuable things; I’ll probably brag about a few when I campaign again. Missing from that list, and I mean nowhere in sight, CFR.

Our progress towards a transparent political system driven more by popular power than by great concentrated money has not advanced an inch.

Why? For starters, CFR isn’t a conversation that a lot of lawmakers like. Few would say the status quo is okay and most would welcome a change to get them out of the game of dollar advertising. But many get cold, if not offended, by a conversation that implies putting campaign money above principle.

Which I am not implying. I value the integrity of most of my coworkers, and the idea of ​​them being bought with burlap sacks of cash, perhaps with cartoon $ signs on the side, is completely wrong.

Large campaign contributions are less of a corruption and more of a distraction. They distract us from our duty to weigh the pros and cons of complex invoices in order to arrive at AYE or NAY. This is often a difficult task that requires all of our attention.

What does not help is a question that sometimes, perhaps unconsciously, comes to the mind of every public official I have met, however principally: “What will my major donors think of it?”

That is not a question that we want in the mix when the heads of state and government make voting decisions. I don’t know how often it changes voices, but I’m sure it postpones or dilutes bold solutions as these times require. When that happens, we fall further behind; The fundamental problems we face – the widening gap between rich and poor, the deterioration of natural systems, the cycles of crime and social dysfunction – are moving ever faster as our piecemeal solution is hampered by concerns about what big financiers are will think walking on tiptoe.

The solution to the distracting large donor question is not to wait for a change in human, in this case the legislature, nature. It is to make sure that there are no large donors.

SB 336 would do that, and I will bring it or a similar bill back for another round in the 2022 session. It does two things that CFR must do: exclude all distracting large donations from any person or group with a personal interest in how laws come out, and provide a structure that is simple enough for interested citizens to track the money. We have to do this; Renouncing CFR is tantamount to renouncing the promise of representative democracy.

But who will do it? Legislators, who started and won the campaign finance system we have now? Can we, who sit in the Senate and in the House of Representatives, seek serious reforms? Or do citizens have to take the reins in a CFR election initiative?

The 2022 meeting should answer that. Definitely count me in.

Senator Jeff Golden represents Medford, Ashland, Phoenix, Talent, Jacksonville, and the Applegate Valley. For a summary of the legislation passed at the 2021 meeting or details of current CFR proposals, contact him at

Medford cash from taxes, state and federal funds

Over the past few weeks, Medford city guides have sat down with department heads and administrators to discuss the $ 191.9 million spending plan for the coming fiscal year.

Yes, that’s nearly $ 200 million of those portraits of George Washington that we sometimes find forgotten in a pocket, crumpled on the bottom of a purse, or thoughtlessly given to the homeless man who is with an empty coffee at the I-93 exit stands cup and a toothy smile.

Where does the money come from? In Medford, property taxes, excise taxes which include automobile, hotel or room occupancy, and meal taxes, state and government grants, licenses, fees. The city earns interest on investments (and pays off debts).

According to the mayor’s budget presentation, $ 127 million, about 70 percent of the city’s revenue, comes from property taxes. People’s pockets. This is called the General Fund and it amounts to around $ 166.4 million and does not include the money from the Community Preservation Act or the income from the Revolving and Enterprise Funds.

Medford also expects to receive $ 27.9 million from the state in various grants and grants. The city also earns local income, collects water and sewage fees, and sells land in the cemetery.

The Enterprise Fund, created for business purposes, brings $ 26.5 million into the city’s coffers, but is said to be self-supporting in order to support itself. The Community Preservation Act Fund, a 1.5 percent property tax surcharge that came into effect in 2017, is state sponsored and pays for the creation and maintenance of open space, historic areas, affordable housing, and outdoor recreational facilities. It amounts to a little over $ 2 million.

For the next two fiscal years, Medford will also receive approximately $ 48.5 million from the American Rescue Plan Act, which will be used to offset the financial devastation caused by COVID-19 through lost revenue.

It can also be used to fund infrastructure projects, including water and sanitation projects, to help stabilize households and businesses adversely affected by the pandemic, address public health issues and continue the fight against the killer virus.

Where are you going now?

In Medford, nearly 40 percent, or $ 63.7 million, is said to be paid for by the city’s schools, which the federal government will add another $ 3.7 million to.

In a presentation to the city council on June 23, school officials hit the high notes: an emphasis on teaching, especially after the pandemic year. A focus of reading specialists and literacy.

Medford's budget includes a facility manager who oversees city structures to prevent deterioration and to schedule and schedule regular maintenance.  The fire department buildings all need repair, and the city is trying to repair or replace its headquarters.

City officials directed schools to find ways to attract teachers to meet the needs of the increasing diversification of the community and ways to recruit staff who identify as colored.

“We have 485 educators in Medford, 15 of them are colored,” noted Councilor George Scarpelli. “There are some buildings if there is no colored stick.”

City councils identified the challenge of recruiting qualified candidates for a district that pays less than other surrounding communities.

A good chunk of the money, nearly $ 30 million, is said to be paid for public safety, both for the police and the fire department. Public works, the people paving the streets, collecting the rubbish, repairing government buildings, get about $ 15.5 million.

Employee benefits and insurance cost the city $ 40.5 million, the state, or the cost of doing business as the city of Medford costs about $ 7 million. The loan repayment costs $ 5.3 million. The budget was $ 2.1 million for culture and recreation and $ 1.7 million for health and human services. The community development budget is $ 699,682.

Dollars represent a community’s quality of life; richer communities making more money can offer residents a more comfortable lifestyle, with community services ranging from roadside composting to lots of pickleball courts for the city’s seniors.