Measure A cash to fund psychological well being program for Metropolis workers

Over $400,000 of Measure A will be used to help City of Turlock employees take care of their mental well-being after council members approved a contract on Tuesday.

In a 4-1 vote against Deputy Mayor Pam Franco, the city council approved a service agreement between the city and Florida-based company Performance on Purpose during its first meeting of the new year. Responding to a call for proposals prepared at the request of the council, Performance on Purpose is asking for $417,994 to implement a voluntary mental wellbeing program for city employees.

According to the company’s website, Performance on Purpose’s mission is to “equip leaders and their teams with the tools to reach their highest potential by providing science-based behavior change solutions to improve well-being and performance.”

“People understand that mental health is a business-critical conversation that needs to be had, and that people cannot do their jobs unless they are supported by the resources they need,” said Lauren Hodges, co-founder of Performance on Purpose , to the Council. “And that often has to come from the workplace.”

Two other companies also responded to the bid with cost estimates of $293,235 and $197,700 for the mental wellbeing program, but Performance on Purpose was rejected by City employees for its “strong strategy” and use of “the latest science and research to… human performance” recommended. according to the staff report.

Through the program, city tours and staff have the opportunity to participate in a variety of offerings, including live, in-person retreats (guided only), biometric screenings, performance coaching, and a variety of virtual programs on topics such as nutrition, stress management, and meditation, to name a few to name.

The nearly $420,000 bill will be funded with money from Measure A, a citywide sales tax approved by Turlock voters in the November 2020 election that is expected to generate $11 million in annual revenue.

Eight areas were listed in the Measure A Order – “Protecting Turlock’s long-term financial stability, maintaining and restoring public safety services, prompt emergency and medical assistance to 911, fire safety, repairing roads and potholes, supporting local businesses, Addressing challenges of homelessness and vagrancy and protecting Turlock’s ability to respond to emergencies and natural disasters.”

The program was originally intended to be funded by COVID relief funds from the American Rescue Plan Act, but Council Member Andrew Nosrati requested use of Measure A funds instead as the council continues to explore the best ways to use relief funds. In addition, business owners and community members called to express their dissatisfaction with the use of ARPA funds for the program.

“I’m not judging this presentation; It sounds like it could be a good thing,” said Lori Smith, owner of Main Street Antiques. “…But from what I’ve read, it looks to me like this could probably be about 300 people, and so much of it is voluntary…You have no way of knowing how many people it actually is will use… Can we use it? $400,000 so the public can benefit a little more?”

Councilor Nicole Larson expressed hesitation in approving such an agreement without a city manager selected, after which Mayor Amy Bublak assured her that one would be selected in two to four weeks. The original point has also been changed to say that the program will not begin until the new city manager is in place and the new leader will be the one who will work with Performance on Purpose to implement it.

“My values ​​are that as leaders we have a responsibility to ensure our employees are physically and mentally healthy and capable of providing the best service to our constituents,” Bublak said. “…We sit in a time where we are losing a lot of people who no longer want to work because of the things that have happened in COVID… This is our way of showing them our appreciation. ”

New Prop. 19 property tax measure can prevent cash – Orange County Register

Most California homeowners have likely heard of Proposition 19, the new property tax law that allows senior citizens and disabled homeowners to keep their current property tax rate when they sell their home and buy a new one. But they may not know how to apply this new law when moving to a new home.

It is the largest expansion of the state’s property tax breaks in decades that basically allows qualified homeowners to take their Prop. 13 tax base with them anywhere in the state, regardless of the price of their new home.

According to sentence 13, tax increases are limited to 2% per year, ie the longer you own your own home, the lower your property taxes are in relation to the market value of your residence. But for most homeowners, if they sell their old home and see their new tax rise to the full market value of their new home, they lose their Prop. 13 tax break.

Voters approved Prop. 19 in November, and the law came into effect on April 1st.

If you are 55 years of age or older, someone with a severe disability, or a victim of a forest fire or natural disaster, you can move to any home in the state regardless of the price of the home. Your tax will remain unchanged until the value of your old home. If your new home costs more than your old one, you will pay an additional amount based on the market value of your old home.

With this big seller, a smaller home doesn’t necessarily mean it’s less expensive.

As a real estate agent, I have worked with clients who were concerned about property tax increases if they downsize their family home, sold it to size, moved to another part of the state, or moved closer to family or healthcare facilities.

If you’re used to low property taxes, it can be a shock to your monthly expenses if buying a replacement home includes a huge hike in property tax – especially if you’ve lived in your current home for many years.

Some older homeowners feel trapped because they cannot leave their current home even if it no longer meets their needs, because they have a steady income and cannot afford to move.

Taking advantage of Prop. 19 can be daunting. But over time, more and more tax auditors are providing links to forms and resources online to help homeowners understand how this new law can benefit them.

Here are some of them:

Also, seek help from a qualified tax professional or attorney.

Not all counties are created equal, and with each new law many questions arise about how the law applies to each person’s situation.

Moving into a home after your children move out shouldn’t mean a huge new property tax bill. Do your research so that you can use your money for your future instead of paying more property taxes.

Leslie Sargent Eskildsen is a RealtyOne Group West real estate agent and a board member of the California Association of Realtors. She can be reached at 949-678-3373 or

Seattle Metropolis Councilmember Sawant to pay for improperly utilizing metropolis cash to assist poll measure

Recall efforts against Seattle councilor Kshama Sawant can advance judge rules

A judge ruled Wednesday that recall efforts can proceed against controversial Seattle councilor Kshama Sawant.

The Seattle The Ethics and Election Commission has ratified a settlement agreement with the city council member Kshama Sawant In which she admitted to misusing city money and other resources to support a proposed electoral action.

Monday’s vote means Sawant will have to pay the city $ 3,516, The Seattle Times reported. That’s twice what she spent advertising a Wage tax on large companies like Amazon.

The decision comes as a Recall campaign collects signatures for an election initiative to remove Sawant. out of office The council member’s announcement on Friday admits one of three recall allegations that she and her supporters have previously emphatically denied.

CONNECTED: Recall efforts against Seattle councilor Kshama Sawant can advance the rules of the Supreme Court

The recall campaign, which must receive 10,000 signatures in Sawant’s District 3 by mid-October in order to be included in the vote Accuses Sawant of opening City Hall to Black Lives Matter protesters although the building was closed and led a march to the home of Mayor Jenny Durkan, a former US attorney whose address is protected by a confidentiality program.

In one statement On Tuesday, Sawant described her violation of ethics as minor and criticized the recall as a right-wing attempt to undo her support for workers and tenants in town hall.

Commissioner Judy Tobin called it a dry topic at a meeting on Zoom.

Stay connected with Q13 News on all platforms:

DOWNLOAD: Q13 News and Weather Apps

CLOCK: Q13 News Live


CONSEQUENCES: Facebook | Twitter | Instagram

Alaska Poll Measure Targets the ‘True Sources’ of Darkish Cash | Wiley Rein LLP

As previously reported in Election Law News, the Alaskans narrowly passed Election Measure 2 in the 2020 general election. This measure, along with other electoral reforms, carries out an open primary and ranked election in the state. The move also has a significant impact on the role of so-called “dark money” in the Alaskan election by introducing strict disclosure of contributions to companies that make independent spending to campaign for the election or defeat of a candidate. The disclosure system primarily focuses on identifying the “true source” of the contributions and any intermediaries.

Definitions. Alaska defines “dark money” as “any contribution whose source or sources, whether wages, capital gains, inheritances, or income from the sale of goods or services, are not made available to the public”. “True Source” means “the person or entity whose contribution is funded by wages, capital gains, inheritances, or income from the sale of goods or services.” However, “[a] Any person or entity who has received funds through contributions, donations, fees, or gifts is not the true source, but an intermediary for the true source. If a member organization receives dues or dues less than $ 2,000 per person per year, the organization itself is considered a “true source”.

Reporting. Election Action 2 aims to tackle the role of “dark money” through strict disclosure by imposing a 24-hour reporting requirement on both independent spending companies and their contributors.

Any individual or group who contributes more than $ 2,000 in total to a business that has made, is making, or is reasonably making independent expenses in a calendar year must report the contribution within 24 hours of crossing this cash threshold. The report must include the applicant’s name, address, main occupation and employer. the amount of the contribution; and the total amount of contributions the applicant made to that company during the calendar year. The applicant must also report and certify the “true source” of the contribution and any intermediaries. In addition, the contributors must “indicate the identity of the true source of the recipient of the contribution at the same time as the contribution itself is made available”.

Companies receiving Entries described above must report the Qualifying Entry and all subsequent entries within 24 hours of receipt.

Disclaimer of liability. The move also requires any group that receives more than 50% of its funding from outside of Alaska to include a disclaimer for all communications that reads, “A majority of contributions to the name of the (externally funded entity) came from outside the state Alaska.”

Wiley’s electoral law and government ethics practice will continue to monitor the implementation of this electoral measure.