Give us the cash we’re owed

HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, Fla. – Hillsborough County Schools’ superintendent Addison Davis said he would urge this week for federal ESSER funds to be released to the school district as soon as possible.

The money is part of the COVID relief effort.

What you need to know

  • Hillsborough County Schools officials hope to use federal COVID aid to offset millions used during the pandemic
  • However, FDOE has stated that the funds should not be used for budget items or recurring expenses
  • Local officials say they are owed the money after doing everything the state has asked them to do

School administrators said this may be the only way to keep the district out of financial compliance.

Hillsborough County Schools officials are trying to make up for a million dollar loss in the district’s reserves that could spark a government takeover.

“We will continue to need to implement mitigation strategies related to reducing the district budget, reducing travel, reducing overtime and leveraging federal dollars,” said Davis.

Some of those federal dollars are withheld because the Florida Department of Education has stated it does not want the money to be used for budget setting or recurring expenses.

Hillsborough School Board Chairwoman Lynn Gray calls it “unfair”.

“We moved money to cover all of the money we spent on COVID,” she said.

Other board members wonder why the money is not being distributed since the district opened as the state requested during the pandemic.

“We did everything,” said Nadia Combs. “We brought so many students back – we let our social workers go there to find students, and that’s why we’re now saying, ‘Please give us the money we owe.'”

Davis called the Department of Education Tuesday to request a meeting.

But he said he doesn’t know if money will be released before the end of the 2021 legislative session on April 30th.

“They’re just looking at how they fund education, the overall budget, and how that affects us so we don’t spend recurring dollars on difficult positions, and I think that’s kind of where we got into this difficult place in Hillsborough, “said Davis.

He said district officials do not anticipate any further downsizing at the moment.

Instead, they look for ways to save energy and talk about asking the community for financial help.

The school council members also discussed drawing up a professional development plan for Davis.

They said it will focus on several key areas including climate and culture, stakeholder trust, leadership style, relationships with board members and collaboration.

Details will be discussed at a later date.

Google needs to present researchers cash. Some not wish to take it

Little did Luke Stark look for money on Google in November that he would turn down $ 60,000 from the tech giant in March.

Stark, Assistant Professor at Western University in Ontario, Canada, studies the social and ethical implications of artificial intelligence. At the end of November he applied for one Google Research Scholar Award, a non-binding research grant of up to $ 60,000 to support professors early in their careers.

He applied for the award and said, “Based on my feeling then that Google is building a really strong, potentially industry-leading team in ethical AI.”

Soon this feeling began to dissipate. In early December, Timnit Gebru, co-head of Google’s ethical AI team and a prominent black woman in a predominantly white, male area, abruptly left Google. On Wednesday, December 2nd, she has tweeted that she was “fired immediately” for an email she sent to an internal mailing list. In the email, she expressed dismay at the continuing lack of diversity in the company and frustration with an internal process related to the review of a then-unpublished one research paper on the risks of building bigger and bigger AI language models – a vivid type of AI increasingly important to Google’s huge search business.

At the time, Gebru said Google AI leadership had told her to withdraw the paper from exam for a presentation at a conference, or remove her name from it. Google accepted Gebru’s resignation over a list of demands she emailed that needed to be met in order for her to continue working at the company.

Gebru’s fall sparked months of crisis for the company, including Employee departures, a change in leadershipand an apology from the Google CEO for some employees questioning their place there due to the circumstances surrounding Gebru’s departure. Google ran one internal investigation into the matter Results of this have been announced On the same day, the company fired Gebru’s co-team leader Margaret Mitchell, who had consistently criticized the company on Twitter after Gebru left. (Google cited “multiple violations” of its code of conduct.) Meanwhile, researchers outside of Google, particularly in the AI ​​space, are increasingly suspicious of the company’s historically prestigious grant and angry with Gebru and Mitchell’s treatment.

All of this became sharp for Stark on Wednesday March 10th when Google sent him a congratulatory letter in which he received $ 60,000 for his proposal for a research project examining how companies are adopting AI that uses emotions be recognized. Stark said he immediately felt he had to turn down the award to show his support for Gebru and Mitchell, as well as those who are still on Google’s ethical AI team.

“My first thought was, ‘I have to refuse,” Stark told CNN Business.

Stark is among a growing number of scholars who cite Gebru and Mitchell’s conclusions about recent decisions regarding the company’s loss of funding or opportunity. Some AI conference organizers are considering sponsoring Google. And at least one academic who has received a large check from Google in the past has now stated so will not seek his financial support until changes are made in the company.

“I can no longer accept funding in good conscience from a company that treats its employees this way,” Vijay Chidambaram, an assistant professor studying storage systems at the University of Texas at Austin, told CNN Business. Chidambaram received $ 30,000 from Google for a research project in 2018.

The money involved is of little importance to Google. However, the growing impact of tensions between Google and its ethical AI team poses a risk to the company Reputation and stature in the AI ​​community. This is vital when Google is competing for talent – both as employees of the company and names associated with it in the academic community.

“I think this is more common than even the company realizes,” said Stark.

Lose weight in solidarity

Despite his initial inclination, Stark did not immediately turn down Google’s award. He spoke to colleagues about what he was up to – “People supported every decision I made,” he said – before sending his reply to Google the following Friday. He thanked the company for the “vote of confidence” in its research, but wrote that “he received this award out of solidarity with Dr. Gebru and Mitchell, their teammates and anyone else who found themselves in similar situations, ”CNN Business said in an email.

“I look forward to the opportunity to work with Google Research again when the organization and its leaders have reflected on their decision on this case, addressed the harm they have caused, and committed word and deed to promoting critical research and products that do Support justice and justice, ”wrote Stark.

He tweeted on his decision to decline the award and make it public, noting that many people cannot afford to decline such funds from Google or other companies. Stark can do without the money because his department at Western University is adequately funded. Google’s award would have provided additional research funding, he said.

“All we can do is what we can reasonably do – and that was something I thought I could,” said Stark tweeted.

Gebru said she appreciated Stark’s action.

“It’s a pretty big deal for someone to turn down Google sponsorship,” she told CNN Business. “Especially someone early in their career.”

A Google spokesperson said the company has awarded more than 6,500 academic and research grants to people outside of Google in the past 15 years. According to the spokesman, Stark is the first person to turn down one.

“It was a real fiasco the way they were treated”

But Stark’s decision is just the latest token of solidarity with Gebru and Mitchell.

The first obvious sign of anger came shortly after Gebru left Google. ON Medium post that decodes their departure and the demand for transparency about Google’s decision on the research paper quickly received signatures from Google employees and supporters in the academic and AI fields. By the end of March, the number of supporters had grown to nearly 2,700 Google employees and over 4,300 others.

At the beginning of March, the conference to which Gebru and her co-authors had submitted the paper had the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparencyor FAccT has discontinued its sponsorship agreement with Google. Gebru is one of the founders of the conference and a member of the first FAccT Executive Committee. Google has been a sponsor every year since the annual conference began in 2018. Michael Ekstrand, co-chair of the ACM FAccT network, confirmed to CNN Business that the sponsorship has ended and said the move was “in the best interests of the community” and that the group is “rethinking” its sponsorship policy for 2022 becomes. Ekstrand said Gebru was not involved in the decision.

Also in March, two scientists protested against Google’s actions by tweet The They decided not to attend an online robotics research event that was by invitation only. Hadas Kress-Gazit, a Cornell robotics professor, was one of them; She said she was invited in January but grew more reluctant as the event drew near.

“By the way, it was a real fiasco [Gebru and Mitchell] were treated. Nobody has apologized to them yet, ”she said in a recent interview with CNN Business. “I don’t want to interact with companies that behave this way towards top researchers.”

Google’s efforts to push the boundaries in AI

Google is aware that its reputation as a research institution has been damaged in the past few months, and the company has announced that it will fix the problem. At a recent city hall meeting held by Google, first reported on by Reuters and audio received from CNN Business, the company outlined changes to its internal research and publication practices.

“I think the way to regain confidence is to keep publishing cutting-edge work in many, many areas, including pushing the boundaries on topics related to responsible AI and publishing things that are profound to the research community are interesting from the best opportunities to continue to be a leader in research, ”said Jeff Dean, head of AI at Google. He answered a staff question about outside researchers that they would read Google articles “with greater skepticism” now.

Gebru hopes that, as with FAccT, more conferences will reassess their relationships with tech company research laboratories. In the past, much of the work on developing and studying AI was done in an academic setting. However, as companies find more commercial uses for the technology, the lines between the academic and corporate worlds are blurring. Google is just one of many tech companies that has had a huge impact on academic conferences where many of its researchers’ articles are published. The staff sit on conference boards and sponsor numerous conferences each year, sometimes for tens of thousands of dollars.

For example, Google and some subsidiaries of parent company Alphabet were listed as sponsors of the International Machine Learning Conference (ICML) and the Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) with platinum and gold awards of $ 20,000. in 2020 – both major AI conferences. Some of the company’s employees sit on their organizing committees.

ICML President John Langford said the conference was “currently open to sponsorship” from Google for the 2021 conference scheduled for July.

“There is much discussion about how ICML as a conference should promote good machine learning culture and practice, with future sponsorship policy being part of that discussion,” he added.

NeurIPS executive director Mary Ellen Perry said the conference has not yet called for sponsorship annually, but requests will be “assessed against a set of selection guidelines set by this year’s sponsorship chairs.” NeurIPS is planned for December.

However, for Stark and other members of the academic research community, the criteria for accepting funds from Google have already changed.

“Extra research funding would be great,” said Stark. “But it was something that I felt I just couldn’t take.”

These cash and investing ideas may give you stronger legs to run with the bulls — or from them

Don’t Miss Out On These Top Money & Investing Features:

These money and investment stories, popular with MarketWatch readers over the past week, can help you figure out when to run into the herd of investors and when to run away. This is especially important when inflation and interest rate concerns make it difficult for investors to get a clear sense of the stocks’ short-term stance.

Login here to get the best mutual funds and ETF stories from MarketWatch emailed weekly!

Why inflation makes holding bonds riskier than owning stocks in the long run

You would have to hold US Treasuries for 57 years to avoid losing to inflation.
Why inflation makes holding bonds riskier than owning stocks in the long run

The threat to retirees is higher inflation

Inflation expectations have risen in recent months
The threat to retirees is higher inflation

Why Daylight Saving Time and “March Madness” can make you lose sleep because of your investments

Stocks – and investors – battle it out during the college basketball championship and Spring Time Change.
Why Daylight Saving Time and “March Madness” can make you lose sleep because of your investments

The preferred value stocks in these investment newsletters far outperformed growth stocks

The “value” proposal still applies: since November, the return on a basket of value stocks has been 53% compared to 11% for the S&P 500.
The preferred value stocks in these investment newsletters far outperformed growth stocks

Dow 32,000? If dividends were counted, the index could be more than 1 million points higher

Almost half of the long-term total return on the Dow Jones Industrial Average since 1928 has come from dividends.
Dow 32,000? If dividends were counted, the index could be more than 1 million points higher

Active managers followed the stock indices in 2020, the S&P report notes

According to a closely watched annual report from the S&P Dow Jones Indices, a majority of U.S. equity funds underperformed the S&P 500 index in 2020.
Active managers followed the stock indices in 2020, the S&P report notes

Buyers attention: what’s really in your “green” ESG fund?

Some socially conscious mutual funds and ETFs own stocks that seem strangely out of place.
Buyers attention: what’s really in your “green” ESG fund?

Why rookie stock investors should seriously consider getting seasoned financial advice

Financial planners can help maintain new wealth and find ways to build it.
Why rookie stock investors should seriously consider getting seasoned financial advice

What you need to know about filing your 2020 taxes

We’re facing tax changes, a pandemic, an understaffed IRS, and a questionable postal service
What you need to know about filing your 2020 taxes

What the democratization of private aviation means for investors

Kenny Dichter, founder and CEO of private aviation company Wheels Up, discusses new opportunities in private aviation for consumers and investors.
What the democratization of private aviation means for investors

NFTs are creating a boom in digital art. This is how they work

Non-fungible tokens or NFTs exploded in the digital art scene last year. Proponents say they are a way to make digital assets scarce and therefore more valuable. WSJ explains how they work and why skeptics wonder if they’re built to last.
NFTs are creating a boom in digital art. This is how they work

3 Still More Things You Can Do to Minimize Last Year’s Taxes

It’s not too late to start lowering your 2020 tax burden. Here’s what you can do to minimize your taxes.
3 Still More Things You Can Do to Minimize Last Year’s Taxes

Watch now: Illinois State College supporters give cash, hope | Native Training


Liz Adams, Senior Director of Development at Illinois State University College of Business, tapes a message of encouragement to students in the Watterson Commons tunnel on Thursday during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Lenore Saturday

Among the messages were those who said, “Stay positive – test negative”: “Don’t give up hope. We take care of you. “And” It’s been a tough year, but you can do it. “There was even a signed” Mama & Papa “that simply said,” You got this! “

This is the third annual Birds Give Back event, but the first to take place during a pandemic. For more information, see

Support local journalism

Your membership enables our reporting.



One of several messages of hope posted in the Illinois State University’s Watterson Commons tunnel on Thursday encourages students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Lenore Saturday

Last year, Birds Give Back attracted 2,188 gifts, most donors on a single donation day.

“We want to top our total for last year if we can,” said Nelson. More than $ 1.1 million was raised during Birds Give Back 2020.


Messages of hope fill part of a wall in the Watterson Commons Tunnel at Illinois State University on Thursday. The words of encouragement came as part of Birds Give Back, an annual day of giving. The organizers had hoped to collect 1,000 messages by the end of the day.

Lenore Saturday

“Our main goal for this year is 2,021 gifts,” said Nelson, marking the start of 2021.

By late afternoon, they had achieved their “primary goal” and raised more than $ 518,000 from more than 2,021 gifts.

“We are focusing on donors as opposed to dollars that day,” she added. “The great thing is that this is our third year and we’re definitely seeing the momentum build up.”

Proposal would give cash to North Dakota coal vegetation by taxing wind energy | Govt-and-politics

The bill before the North Dakota legislature would impose a tax on wind farms equal to half the production tax credit. The tax would only apply to wind farms starting in 2021 or in future years. State tax officials estimate the move would generate $ 5 million a year in tax revenue from a new wind farm.

The money would go to a “Network Reliability and Resilience Fund” and the three-person Public Service Commission would be tasked with using the money to provide grants for qualified power plants.

North Dakota power plants run on coal, natural gas, or water. Plants would only be eligible if they met a number of criteria, including a 30 day on-site supply of fuel, as is the case with coal-fired power plants.

The bill comes from the fact that coal-fired power plants across the country are competing for competition in a boom in renewable natural gas power.

Coal Creek Station is slated to close in 2022

In North Dakota, Great River Energy announced last year that the state’s largest coal-fired power station, Coal Creek Station, would be closed.

“I think this is a wake-up call,” said Geoff Simon, executive director of the Western Dakota Energy Association, which represents counties, cities and school districts in North Dakota’s oil and coal producing regions.

Support local journalism

Your membership enables our reporting.


Simon spoke out in favor of the bill on Tuesday, saying it was “a proactive approach to addressing this growing threat”.