Sam Smith refers to gender id with new tattoo | Leisure

Sam Smith has hinted at her gender identity with her new tattoo.

The “How do you sleep?” hitmaker – who announced two years ago that they were not binary and wanted to use s / s pronouns – seemed to be referencing their identity in their new ink.

The tattoo, shared online by the London Social Tattoo Shop, shows a short-haired person in underwear looking in the mirror in high heels.

They titled it: “ICON @samsmith thanks for getting tattooed (sic)”

Sam had previously admitted that they were “always not binary”.

They said, “I’ve always had a little war in my body and mind … I’m neither male nor female, I guess I flow somewhere in between. It’s all on the spectrum …

“Yeah, I’ve always been non-binary, I’ve always felt the way I felt, and just hearing other non-binary stories make me feel suddenly seen. This is a way I can live where I am Tell people this is how I feel and how I want to be treated, life is easier. “

And the 28-year-old singer is happy that they changed their pronouns as they were able to “feel just like themselves” and “enjoy” their lives.

They added, “I’ve always felt the way I felt. It wasn’t a new feeling, it was just the discovery of a language and a community of people who felt the same way. It was beautiful. It was a process of Feeling heard and seen – that there is a space where I can live and enjoy my life and feel just like me and be treated as such. I think that’s the difference to the pronouns. “

Millennial Cash: Bust gender bias and steadiness work from home

No matter how modern same-sex couples may be in their views on equality, old habits die hard. The Covid-19 pandemic made this very clear to parents who have already struggled to find balance.

According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Mothers and fathers both left the workforce earlier in the April 2020 pandemic, but almost all fathers eventually returned to work while many mothers stayed at home. And a paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that recessions typically increase the gender pay gap by 2 percentage points, but a pandemic-induced recession increases the gap by 5 percentage points.

As a result, a generation of career-minded women face many of the same obstacles that have left previous generations of women underpaid or entirely unemployed. To solve these problems, you need to examine your prejudices, model the behavior you want other families to adopt, and treat your partner with empathy.


Ed Coambs, a financial therapist in Charlotte, North Carolina, asks clients to tell him about how money and work were seen in their growing families. He notes that while your stated values ​​may include equality, the values ​​of your family and community also influence your views, and those values ​​may not match.

Coambs can relate. When he met his wife, she was in dental school and he was working as a firefighter. Once she graduated, she would earn more than him. At first, Coambs was in full support.

“Then we came into the reality of living together,” he says. “It exposed insecurities about not being the breadwinner and not conforming to my internalized gender roles and expectations.” In Coambs’ case, his father was the breadwinner when he was growing up.

Culture also influences your value system. Melissa Daroszewski was active in the Black Law Students Association while studying law. “We have talked many times about the increase in black women earning higher degrees,” she says.

Many black women she knew said they wanted to marry a black man but struggled to find someone who deserved the same or more. Daroszewski, who graduated in 2009 and now lives in Laurel Springs, New Jersey, said the men in her class were predominantly white.

“I can see that the further you are in your career the more problematic it is, especially if you aspire to be a partner or senior member of a profession in which you do,” she says. “You will want someone who is equal or agrees with the fact that they earn less.”

There is great attraction to family, race, and community, and your partner comes into a relationship with a distinct cultural background. When you’re working on resolving disagreements, it’s okay to admit that something doesn’t feel good to you because it is different from your upbringing.

“A lot of couples don’t take the time to develop their relationship to think through these really critical issues,” says Coambs. It’s important to talk about day-to-day money management, but also to discuss things about how money was for you as an adult. This can give you some insight into your partner’s mindset.


By challenging your own prejudices, you and your partner can begin to model the behaviors that you would like to be more prevalent, which even on a small scale can lead to change.

Darcy Lockman, author of “All the Rage: Mothers, Fathers, and the Myth of Equal Partnership,” looks to history as an example. During World War II, more women worked outside the home, paving the way for greater diffusion. “The behavior hasn’t changed because the attitudes have changed,” says Lockman. “Settings have changed because behavior has changed.”

Because of the pandemic, she says, we’re seeing something new. In families where the man can work from home and the woman has a job that she must do personally, the involvement of men at home has increased dramatically. Lockman cites the physical absence of women as one reason men have been reinforced. “That means millions of children and neighbors will see men at home,” she says, a new behavior change that can further change attitudes in society.

Tap your EMPATHY

Larin Brink worked in the television and film industries as a prop assistant before she had children. She now works at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Virginia, a job that allows her to be more available to her family. Her income no longer matches her husband’s, and his frequent back-to-back meetings mean she often does things like virtual schooling or trips to the pediatrician.

“I don’t make that much money so my job isn’t that important right now, and it’s a shame to say that, but that’s the truth,” she says.

But Brink realizes that her husband is facing his own struggle: the fear that employees without small children at home will be more available at work than he is. “He wants to be engaged to show and prove his worth,” she says.

Seeing things from the other person’s point of view is a great way to put out metaphorical fires. “Does empathy fix everything? No,” says Coambs. “But is it a good starting point? Yes.”


This column was provided to The Associated Press by the personal finance website NerdWallet. Sara Rathner is a writer at NerdWallet.


NerdWallet: COVID-19 and Your Money: Our Guide to Managing Your Finances During Troubled Times

Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis: Pandemic pushes mothers of young children out of work

National Bureau of Economic Research: It’s different this time: The role of women’s employment in a pandemic recession

NCAA weight room discrepancy displays continual gender inequality

The NCAA has a chronic problem with undervalued women, writer and presenter Jemele Hill said Friday – and the recent controversy over weight room discrepancies highlights that inequality.

“This has long been a consistent issue when it comes to the lack of equity between men’s and women’s sports,” Hill said. “This should let everyone know who is seeing and hearing this story that it was about the fact that they didn’t think they were worth it to begin with.”

A Stanford University athletic performance coach posted photos on Twitter Thursday exposing inequalities between the weight rooms of women and men.

Photos of Ali Kershner, a coach for the Stanford women’s basketball and golf teams, showed the women’s weight room in the NCAA bubble in San Antonio – a dumbbell rack and some yoga mats. The men’s weight room in their NCAA bubble in Indianapolis. was decked out with equipment worth a gym.

On a Friday morning call to Zoom, NCAA senior vice president of basketball Dan Gavitt promised to do better.

“I apologize to the students, coaches and the women’s committee for dropping the ball on the San Antonio weight room issue. We’ll fix it as soon as possible,” said Gavitt.

NCAA vice president for women’s basketball Lynn Holzman said later Friday the organization is looking at ways to adjust square footage and provide more exercise opportunities.

Hill told CNBCs “The News with Shepard Smith” the rapid response on Friday was significant.

“When they were caught and this video went viral, they suddenly had a change of heart within 24 hours,” said Hill, who hosts the Spotify podcast. “Jemele Hill is undisturbed.” “The money was always there. The money isn’t the problem. The problem is they don’t believe these women are worth it.”

ESPN signed a 14-year $ 500 million contract with the NCAA in the 2023/24 academic year to expand rights to 24 college championships, including continued coverage of the Women’s Division I basketball tournament.

Hill told host Shepard Smith that going forward, the NCAA “must do everything it can to show that they take women’s sport seriously because it looks worse as the background to this is that it is the month of women’s history.”

NCAA officials were not immediately available Friday to respond to Hill’s comments.

Prize cash: Cricket makes progress in direction of gender parity, largest hole in soccer

According to a study by BBC Sport, the vast majority of sports offer men and women equal prize money at the highest level.

Of the 48 sports studied, 37 offered prize money – only three of which did not offer parity at any of their major championships or events.

The biggest gaps in prize money for male and female athletes are in soccer, golf, and basketball.

“Women’s sport is getting stronger,” said Sports Secretary Nigel Huddleston.

“It is absolutely true that the rewards match this achievement and we have seen a significant increase in the prize money on offer over the past few years.

“We must continue to push for greater participation, employment, commercial opportunities and visibility of women’s sport in the media to keep this momentum going.”

Since the last edition of the BBC Sports Studies prize money in 2017, sports such as hockey, cliff jumping, surfing and wrestling have hit par in at least one major competition.

However, cricket has taken the greatest strides to fill the void.

The Hundred, which is scheduled to open for the 2021 season, offers equal prize money in the men’s and women’s tournaments, while the men’s and women’s Big Bash leagues hit parity in the 2017/18 season.

The Australian champion received US $ 1 million (£ 716,635) in prize money at the 2020 T20 Women’s World Cup. This is supposedly the sameexternal link on what the winners of the men’s tournament will win in 2021, but the International Cricket Council (ICC) has not yet confirmed the tournament’s prize pot.

The total prize money for the 2022 Women’s World Cup has been increased to $ 3.5 million (£ 2.5 million). In 2017, England won $ 660,000 (£ 470,500) out of a total of $ 2 million, compared to the $ 4 million (£ 3.1 million) the English men won from a total of $ 10 million in 2019 had.

“We made a very strong statement that we wanted the same prize money because it really shows how much we really value women’s cricket and the forward-looking women’s game,” said Beth Barrett-Wild, director of The Hundred BBC Sport women’s competition .

“This really tangible action will hopefully get others to come with us.

“If you want to authentically say that you value the sport in exactly the same way for men and women, you have to award the same prize money.”

What is the BBC Prize Money in the Sports Study?

This is the third time, after 2014 and 2017, that BBC Sport has carried out the global study.

The 2021 study focuses on the prize money awarded to contest winners and does not include wages, bonuses, or sponsorship.

Some sports, including rugby union and rowing, do not offer men or women prize money in major competitions.

Men and women compete side by side at horse races and equestrian events.

In darts, snooker and bowls, women can take part in men’s tournaments if they qualify. There are separate women’s snooker and bowls competitions, but the prize money is significantly lower, while the closure of the British Darts Organization (BDO) in 2020 means there will no longer be a separate women’s world darts championship.

What has changed since the 2017 study?

The men’s and women’s winning teams pocketed $ 250,000 each in the first Pro League in 2019, while a women’s Euro Hockey league was introduced for the 2019-20 season, offering the same prize money to the men’s league.

Wrestling’s Ranking Series brought in the same prize money in 2018, while the World Surf League hit parity in 2019.

The Cliff Diving World Series offers its male and female athletes prize money of 7,085 euros from 2021. British bronze medalist Jess Macaulay said this as a “relief”.

“It was a relief to hear them say we would get equal pay for our next competitions because this is our career. We all put the same amount of time and effort into trying to be the best at the field,” she told BBC Sport.

“If we want to be at the top of our game, we want to be valued as much as the men in the sport. It’s just very exciting. It felt like a big step for our sport.”

In road cycling, Britain’s most prestigious men’s and women’s races – the Tour of Britain and the Women’s Tour – have had the same prize money since 2018. The stage winners will receive 3,615 euros, while the overall winners will take home 14,460 euros).

Most road races still don’t pay the same prize money, however, an inequality that became even more apparent at Omloop Het Nieuwsblad last month. Davide Ballerini won the men’s race for 16,000 euros, while the women’s champion and gold medalist of the Olympic and world road race Anna van der Breggen won 930 euros.

This year’s Rugby League World Cup has yet to confirm its prize money, but it will be the first time that prize money will be given to the victorious women’s and wheelchair teams, and all teams will receive the same entry fees.

Where is the largest gap?

The Women’s World Cup offers the most prize money in women’s sport, but remains 9.5 times less than what was awarded at the men’s tournament

The difference in prize money in men’s and women’s football remains large.

The 2019 Women’s World Cup was the most-watched edition of the tournament in history, but despite the projected total audience audience of 1.12 billion, which makes up a third of the 2018 Men’s World Cup, the prize fund was more than nine times smaller.

The U.S. women’s national team won $ 4 million (£ 2.8 million) compared to the French men’s win of $ 38 million (£ 27.2 million) in 2018. The women’s prize pool was double that of the previous tournament in 2015, and Fifa has announced that it will double again for the 2023 edition.

Fifa told BBC Sport that it “has a long-term vision for the development of women’s football at all levels of the world and is investing to that end”.

In the Champions League, Uefa has reduced the prize money for the winners from 250,000 euros in 2019 to 150,000 euros in 2020 and 2021, while the prize fund for men remained at 19 million euros. £ 16.4m).

Uefa informed the BBC that the prize money for earlier rounds of the competition has increased so that the winner will receive more than in previous seasons.

In the FA Cup, the victorious men’s club will earn £ 1.8m in the 2021 season, while the winners will pocket £ 25,000.

“While we recognize that there are currently significant differences between the prize money for men’s and women’s competitions, it is determined by the amounts of money generated from commercial revenue, including national and international broadcast rights,” an FA spokesman told BBC Sport .

“The [men’s] FA Cup is the largest revenue producer for the FA. These revenues allow us to reinvest in football at all levels and we have made significant strides in developing the women’s game as a result. “

Disparities also persist in golf. Women golfers are among the top earners in top sport, but still earn considerably less than their male counterparts in majors.

The US Open in June has a chance for men to win $ 2.25 million (£ 1.6 million), while the grand prize for the US Women’s Open this month is $ 1 million (£ 716,605). In 2014, the difference between these two numbers was less – $ 900,000.

At the 2019 Open, Shane Lowry won £ 1.9 million while Sophia Popov, the 2020 Women’s British Open winner – the men’s event was canceled due to coronavirus – received $ 675,000 (£ 483,924).

While the numbers for the 2021 tournaments have not yet been released, a spokeswoman for R&A, which organizes The Open and Women’s British Open, said her “stated goal” was to close the prize money gap.

She said, “We have made significant strides in this regard and are working hard to increase the championship’s economic effectiveness to increase revenue and support further investment in the future.

“We are fully aware that we have a lot more to do, but we cannot do it alone. We must all do our part to increase the commercial success of women’s golf at its best, and that means that everyone from the golf association to the sponsor and the media. “

Craig Annis, USGA’s chief brand officer, said the organization is “committed to gender equality in golf.”

“The US Women’s Open leads the purse in all of women’s golf, which requires a disproportionate investment in the championship when compared to the income generated,” he said.

“We will continue to invest to ensure that the US Women’s Open remains the premier women’s golf event through wallet, broadcast, host sites and gaming experience as we near the ultimate goal of wallet parity.”

One sign that golf is slowly changing is the new ISPS Handa World Invitational Event. It is jointly approved by the European Tours for Men and Women and the LPGA and will host separate tournaments for men and women in July, with equal fields competing for the same prize money.

How does Covid-19 affect the prize money?

The coronavirus pandemic has had and will have an impact on sport at all levels. While the majority of the sports surveyed by the BBC said the prize money would not be affected, many said they did not know at the time.

The FA is currently planning “potential losses” of around £ 300 million and has reduced the competition’s prize money as a result.

The men’s FA Cup prize fund this season has decreased to that of the 2017-18 tournament, with the £ 1.8m prize awarded to winners half of that won in 2018-19 and 2019-20 Amount is.

However, the main prize for the women’s FA Cup winners remains the same.

Kelly Simmons, the FA’s director for the women’s pro game, said, “It’s well documented that the FA has seen significant cuts and layoffs. It’s a very difficult environment. It is not the time to look for new money right now search.” .

“Across the board, we want to develop and expand the FA Cup for women, just like we did with the Super League for women, by helping to develop it commercially to generate revenue and ultimately as much money as possible bring the clubs. “

“Of course we want to increase the prize fund, but those funds aren’t there, so we’re investing in clubs in other ways.”

This year’s Australian Open tennis tournament reduced the payout to the winners by 33% compared to 2020, although the total prize pot increased. This was done to increase the money won by lower ranked players who were eliminated in previous rounds and whose income was affected by the pandemic.

When did the sport start paying the same prize money?

The sport began for years, paying men and women the same prize moneyAll about the BBC iPlayer bannerAround the footer of the BBC iPlayer