Justin Thomas gave Michael Visacki cash to assist his profession

At the end of April we met Michael Visacki, a mini-tour golfer who got emotional on a phone call with his father after qualifying for his first PGA Tour event since his career in 2013.

A few days later he went out and started this event in an incredible way. While Vissacki didn’t make the cut at the Valspar Championship, it was very cool to see someone come true a dream that meant so much to them.

Visacki’s story earned him an invitation to the annual PGA Tour stop last weekend in Colonial for the Charles Schwab Classic. He missed the cut after rounds 77-72 but before leaving he shared a great moment with Justin Thomas who presented him with a check to help him with his career.

Being a mini-tour player can be very expensive, and that expense can be a burden on a player trying to make their way up to the PGA Tour.

That was great:

pic.twitter.com/X3YvnedUCE

– Rick Gehman (@RickRunGood) May 31, 2021

Visacki spoke at Valspar about how expensive it is to be a mini-tour player. Posted by Kyle Porter of CBS Sports:

“It’s extremely difficult,” said Visacki. “Sometimes the entry fees are $ 400 to $ 600, and if you don’t win or finish second, I mean you are barely breaking even. Then it is not the case that there is a free entry fee every week, that we are only playing for one price. For example, if you miss two or three cuts and each cut costs you $ 500 each tournament, then in two or three weeks you will be down $ 1,500 in entry fee alone, hopefully the car won’t break down.

“Despite all of my success, it’s still very, very, very difficult to make a living. If I had to pay rent, I probably still wouldn’t be able to play as much professional golf as I’ve won in the past. “

Good from Thomas, number 2 in the world, for helping him. And what a sweet reaction from Visacki and his Pops.

Chelsea gave cash to over 2,000 households. Here is how they spent it.

Last fall, in the middle of the second COVID-19 surge, the city of Chelsea brought to life The largest guaranteed income project in the country, shifting relief efforts from community food distribution locations to simply transferring money to thousands of residents in the hardest hit community – with no restrictions.

The program was synchronized with the help of local non-profit organizations Chelsea eats – Almost every eighth household in Chelsea gave a debit card between $ 200 and $ 400, which was fully replenished every month for six months, depending on household size. The cards can be used anywhere that Visa is accepted. The residents could spend the money almost anywhere.

However, a new study suggests that the program worked as proponents intended.

A Report released on Monday Harvard Kennedy School’s Rappaport Institute for the greater Boston area found approximately $ 1.5 million – or 73.3 percent – of the $ 2.1 million distributed through the Chelsea Eats program in grocery stores, markets , Restaurants and other places where food is the main product. Supporters say the results help emerging research from similar experiments with guaranteed income that the recipients use the money for basic needs such as food.

“Government programs are most effective when they give people the tools and the freedom of choice to make the best decisions for themselves and their families,” said Jill Shah, president of the Shah Family Foundation, which finances and manages the Chelsea Eats. Program has contributed.

The initiative – which was funded primarily by the City of Chelsea from government COVID-19 relief funds, along with minor contributions from the Shah Family Foundation, Massachusetts General Hospital Center to Improve Community Health, and the United Way of Massachusetts Bay and Merrimack Valley – Financed debit cards for 2,074 households at risk from mid-November to April. Most of the recipients reported Job loss or financial difficulties due to the pandemic.

While Monday’s new report doesn’t show exactly what recipients bought, researchers were generally able to categorize spend based on supplier data on the cards – with grocers being the clear market leaders. The researchers said the results were not surprising since “the applicants were largely recruited from users of the pantry”.

“While it is likely that most of these purchases will be groceries, it is of course possible to purchase many other items, such as cleaning supplies, from these locations,” they wrote in the report.

Almost exactly 50 percent of the expenditure was made in grocery chains. In fact, 32 percent of all spending at Market Basket was made, “mostly at the Chelsea location,” the report said.

Another 11.6 percent was spent in wholesale chains like BJ’s and Costco, and just over 5 percent of the spending was in local grocery stores and convenience stores. Almost 7 percent of the money went to local restaurants, with Dunkin ‘and McDonalds leading the way.

The researchers noted that they are working on conducting a more detailed survey of beneficiaries to assess “the extent to which the program is leading to greater food adequacy and a reduction in food insecurity”.

Retail made up nearly 21 percent of spending, with big names like Walmart, Target, Burlington Stores, Amazon, Family Dollar, CVS, and TJ Maxx making up more than half of the spending in that category.

A little more than 4 percent of spending went to providers classified as “Utilities and Professional Services”, mostly utilities like Comcast, Eversource and National Grid, or cellular operators like T-Mobile, MetroPCS and AT&T. A significant minority ” previously reported in their survey that they were lagging behind due to overdue payments on bills or the phone was disconnected.

Transportation costs such as gasoline, MBTA tariffs and carpooling made up 1.3 percent of the expenditure. And only 0.4 percent came from liquor stores and smoke shops, although the authors admitted that alcohol and cigarettes can be bought in grocery stores and convenience stores, so spending on these products could be “a little higher”.

They also found that only $ 1,947 was spent on rent – despite the pandemic additional pressure on the city’s housing market – probably because only a few landlords accept Visa.

Harvard Professor Jeffrey Liebman, director of the Rappaport Institute, described the program as an overall achievement in “helping Chelsea families buy groceries and other essentials”. He also noticed that the size of the program – which was significantly larger than that well-known project with a guaranteed income of 125 recipients in Stockton, California – “shows that direct payments can be delivered on a large scale.”

Chelsea City manager Tom Ambrosino told Boston.com in an email Monday that the city is hoping to find a way to extend the six-month program – or in some form or another. However, funding remains a challenge.

“We just need more money,” said Ambrosino. “I’m currently working with the Shah Foundation and the Council to find out.”

The program is currently funded until the beginning of summer. According to the Shah Foundation, they expect more news on this front in the coming weeks.

Receive the browser notifications from Boston.com:

Activate breaking news notifications right in your internet browser.

Turn on notifications

Great, you’re signed in!

Kelly Osbourne: Weight reduction surgical procedure gave me a combating probability | Leisure

Kelly Osbourne says that weight loss surgery gave her a “fighting chance” to start her life again.

The 36-year-old reality star underwent gastrointestinal surgery in 2018 and said she couldn’t be happier with her decision to go under the knife – which involves removing more than half of the stomach in the form of a sleeve or a shape Tube – after quickly gaining weight when sobered in 2017.

Speaking to Us Weekly, she said, “I got sober. I replaced drugs and alcohol with food, my body was metabolized differently. When I got sober and put on uncontrollable weight it was insane.

“[People] kept telling me, “You should do the operation.” I was so against it. … I thought the operation was an excuse and it was like a fraud. That couldn’t be further from the truth. The operation gave me a chance to fight. “

Although the surgery gave her the first boost she needed to lose weight, Kelly did not follow her doctor’s instructions after her surgery and therefore stopped seeing results.

She added to Us Weekly magazine, “I lost, I want to say, 35 pounds, 40 pounds. And then I stopped losing weight. I just stopped because I didn’t listen to what they said. I just thought it would be a quick fix. I would be done. I would be thin. [I thought I] didn’t have to exercise or do anything. I couldn’t have been more wrong. You have to do everything they tell you when you do the surgery or it will not work. “

Meanwhile, Kelly recently announced that she had relapsed her sobriety journey after four years but is now back on track.

She wrote on Instagram: “It’s a little difficult for me to talk about, but I have always promised you that I will be honest with you about where I am and what is going on on my path to recovery.

“I’ve fallen behind, not proud of it, but I’m back on track and I’m going to do a podcast this week telling everyone what’s going on and what happened.

“I just want you to know that I’m sober today and I’ll be sober tomorrow.

“But I really learned that it is only one day at a time and I wanted to tell you the truth because I never want to lie to you.

“Thank you for your support and love and you will hear from me soon.”

Noel Gallagher: Lockdown gave me a beer stomach! | Leisure Information

Noel Gallagher says Lockdown gave him a “beer belly”.

The former Oasis rocker was at home amid the COVID-19 pandemic and has shown that he is “getting a little fat” for doing nothing but sitting inside and drinking beer because there was little else, what could entertain him.

He said, “Actually, I’m getting a little fat. It’s all the booze. I get a little beer belly. Like everyone else, I’ve been drinking at home every night for a year, which I usually never do.

“I usually drink every night out and about and when I get home I go without it for a while and get back in shape. Or you have an evening twice a week so that you don’t drink at home.

“I drink every week. I love it, but I’ve started wearing baggy clothes, let’s put it this way. I looked at it and thought, “That’s a shame.”

“I go to the gym regularly so it can’t be that bad.”

And Noel also announced he was losing his eyesight and is considering laser surgery to correct his eyesight.

He told Matt Morgan’s “Funny How?” Podcast: “My eyes are really damn bad now. My eyesight is failing or whatever the visual term may be. It’s not as spicy as it was.

“I can’t read anything. I think you must have a certain level of wickedness to undergo laser eye surgery, and I’m about to do it right now. “

In the meantime, the 53-year-old musician has also helped his 10-year-old son Sonny look after his two tarantulas, which he bought for the boy in December.

Noel, who has Sonny and Donovan, 13, with wife Sara MacDonald as well as 21-year-old Anais with ex-wife Meg Matthews, recently said the eight-legged animals are growing steadily and admitted he’s careful about them Don’t do it don’t get too big as the cruel twos scare him.

He said, “They are about the size of a matchbook right now, nothing too spectacular. The tanks that came with them are pretty small, so I assume they won’t be the size of af *.” ***** Jack Russell. “

Ashley Graham’s Publish-Child Hair Progress Gave Her A Bond Villain Model Fringe

Refinery 29 UK

A year later, how are fashion rental companies doing?

When the lockdown brought our social and office life to a standstill, our closets were the first to feel the effects. With nowhere to go and no one to see, we gave up most of our clothing in favor of a uniform of tracksuits and housecoats. As many saved unnecessary expenses, fashion became even less important, leading many to cancel their clothing rental subscriptions. While none of the rental companies I’ve spoken to have spoken to common numbers, all of them have confirmed they’ve seen a decline in orders and an increase in membership cancellations and breaks since the first U.S. pandemic last March. However, many customers were returning by last summer, though it is unclear whether subscriptions have hit prepandemic numbers. We’re still banned – so what’s changed? According to Ambika Singh, CEO of Armoire, a clothing company that sells contemporary brands like Rag & Bone, Equipment, and Scotch & Soda, people at home have started dressing up again just because: “Even though women didn’t see many like that People like they were in their pre-pandemic life were already used to dressing themselves up and giving themselves the boost they needed for the day. “Today Armoire has more“ permanent customers ”than ever before. This term refers to people who have been using the service for more than nine months. URBN’s rental service, which also includes Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie and Free People, says Nuuly, the company has seen memberships revitalized with each new season, with more expected in the spring and summer due to the introduction of vaccines and outdoor events . This could explain why the plus-size brand ELOQUII launched its rental service ELOQUII Unlimited in August. According to CEO Mariah Chase, the service was in the works before March 2020, but research showed that customers still wanted it. “80% of women in sizes 14-28 agreed that a subscription clothing rental service gave them the flexibility they need as their lifestyle evolves in uncertain times,” she says. Part of this pandemic success can be attributed to the communities these companies have purposely built. Armoire launched initiatives such as the “digital changing room”, in which members can upload photos of themselves in the rented clothing to a joint feed. Others, like ELOQUII Unlimited, have added styles that are more relevant to home life and introduced a loungewear launch in the fall. Nuuly also reevaluated its category and brand mix, expanding its maternity and plus size offerings (which its customers requested) and generally relying on both casual aesthetics and “mood-enhancing” styles. “Last year’s topic was casual, but our subscribers were still talking to each other [their lives] through a fashionable lens, ”says Kim Gallagher, Nuuly’s director of marketing and customer success. “They loved our range of glamorous casuals like sequin and velvet joggers.” (I am well aware of the drawstring sequin pants Gallagher is talking about because they happened to be the last product I ordered when I tested Nuuly in February and March last year when things were starting to look somber.) “Fashion It’s always been about self-expression, and rental gives consumers access to a closet that is much larger and more diverse than it would be useful to own. “Christine Hunsicker, Founder and CEO of CaaStle Christine Hunsicker is the Founder and CEO of the growing logistics company CaaStle Due to the success of her previous business, apparel subscription brand Gwynnie Bee (which is now a subsidiary), rental services like ELOQUII Unlimited, Vince Unfold are now being used and Banana Republic Style Passport. According to Hunsicker, the rise of video conferencing presented a new need for the market: “We have seen our members move up [even if] They may have chosen more dresses in the past, ”she says, also naming more comfortable, less structured garments like cashmere sweaters as the most requested styles. Melissa Gonzalez, fashion retailer and CEO of the Lion’esque Group, confirms that people still think about their outfits, but with the computer in mind. “From the waist up, we’re staring at each other more than ever. I think there is a desire to freshen it up and feel good again,” she says. Then there’s the reason many loyalists never canceled their rental subscriptions at first. “The addition of new items to our wardrobe and the thrill of receiving these packages is still a source of real joy. Although we leave our homes less, we have to get dressed and feel good every day, ”says Hunsicker when I ask her why she thinks people keep renting clothes. “We received daily feedback from our members who shared that the arrival of their boxes on their doorstep would be a highlight of their week and a way to self-medicate.” This is the same reason that drew people to rental services when they first stopped by: the joy of being able to wear designer clothes that we otherwise couldn’t afford and trying out styles that we’d be too afraid to be to get involved in the long term. “Fashion has always been about self-expression, and renting it out gives consumers access to a wardrobe that is much larger and more diverse than it would make sense to own,” says Hunsicker. It’s also more sustainable than buying new clothes. COVID-19 forced many to rethink their shopping habits as they faced their own excess. The closets were full of clothes that we barely wore in normal times, let alone a pandemic. Therefore, environmentally friendly alternatives to consuming fashion such as reselling and renting, which are already on the rise, are becoming increasingly popular. “We as consumers have a role to play in rebuilding the post-pandemic world to be fairer and kinder to Mother Earth,” says Singh. “Rental fashion will boom like never before.” Gonzalez agrees that the future of rental looks bright, adding that not only is it more sustainable, but it is also a more economical alternative to buying a brand new closet. “As long as brand partnerships exist and inventory is exciting and consumers have access to brands they have coveted … [rental] is still very valuable. “Melissa Gonzalez, CEO of the Lion’esque Group According to Gonzalez, it is not only customers who benefit from the rental, but also brands that want to assert themselves in front of customers. “It still makes a lot of sense for brands to offer rentals as this is a good entry point for a client to get to know about your brand,” she says. “As long as brand partnerships are in place and inventory is exciting and consumers have access to brands that they previously wanted but might not have been able to afford, this continues to be a really valuable proposition.” Just this week, Ralph Lauren started a rental initiative with the Lauren Ralph Lauren brand (also from CaaStle). Speaking to WWD, David Lauren, the company’s chief innovation and brand officer, said, “We really thought Lauren was an interesting place to start. It was a brand that had lost some of its grip. We thought this would be a way to rekindle interest and curiosity. Gonzalez believes that rental fashion will continue to be popular with consumers: “People look forward to going out again, especially when we get vaccines and the warmer weather comes.” Then there is the future where we ( presumably hopefully) will return for events such as weddings and large social gatherings. With that in mind, according to Gallagher, landlords are well positioned to meet the fashion needs that arise when people return and travel on special occasions. “As we emerge from the pandemic and consumers have more reasons to get dressed, we believe that the value proposition of access to a rotating closet will grow with demand,” says Chase. Because who knows by then what we will want to wear after a year and some of them outside of our closets? Will our style be what it was before the pandemic? Will it be comfort forever? “When we return to pre-pandemic activity, the big question is what wardrobes will look like: is the elastic waist here to stay or will yoga pants be left in quarantine?” says Hunsicker. “Rental services offer a real value proposition to consumers looking to get dressed without committing to a post-pandemic wardrobe.” At Refinery29, we are here to help you navigate this overwhelming world of things. All of our market picks are independently selected and curated by the editorial team. When you buy something that we link to on our website, Refinery29 can earn a commission. Do you like what you see? How about a little more R29 grade, right here? Is this the new frontier for sustainable fashion? It’s time to rent your clothes on20 skinny jeans we love, from plus to petite

WA State Gave COVID Cash to Radical Political Teams

A while ago we saw some interesting spreads of CARES Act money in Washington state, and now a new report shows that money went to some pretty radical political groups – including some racially based.

You may recall that last August Governor Inslee gave $ 40 million in CARES Act funds to illegal farm workers who he claimed did not qualify for stimulus checks. Now the Department of Commerce has apparently distributed $ 11.85 million in funding.

It’s called The Washington Equity Relief Fund. This fund, run by the DOC, distributed money to nonprofit groups that had allegedly suffered setbacks due to COVID. However, a look at their criteria reveals racist and political overtones.

The criteria for qualifying for such a “grant” are as follows from the DOC website:

“This one-time investment provides nonprofits with flexible, general operational support run and serve by blacks, indigenous people, colored people (BIPOC) Communities hardest hit by the global pandemic. “

Jason Rantz of AM 770 KTTH, who first whistled about it, says it smells like race issues … making choices based on race rather than real necessity. Apparently, according to Rants, no minority groups were ignored. It also appears that political agendas were taken into account in the allocation of the money.

One of the groups that got money was Collective Justice, a partisan group for social justice. They are affiliated with the Public Defenders Association. They actively campaign for lawmakers and are known for their soft crime agenda. Now they are urging WA state lawmakers to pass HB 1413, which would force the courts to ignore records of juvenile delinquency from adults awaiting conviction for crimes. You got $ 25,000

Another group, The Bail Project Spokane, received $ 50,000. Inadequate verification of this group did not reveal that it was not a small internet start as described by the applicants. but part of the national Deposit project That has freed over 15,000 high-profile criminals from prison until they appear in court. It appears that some of this money may have been used to rescue criminals.

The Bail Project, says Rantz, has a history of rescuing criminals who continue to commit other crimes.

Neither of these groups is required to provide full evidence of the use of their money, and is simply required to sign a letter of confirmation stating that they would provide such records if asked to do so. Big difference. Apparently most of them are never obliged to.

Rants says Washington is not alone. The Oregon CARES Fund was used to raise money for a group called the Black Oregonians as well as black-owned businesses. Of course, there is nothing wrong with that, except that applicants can apparently only be people of color. The administrators of the CARES fund and the state are now facing several discrimination complaints.

Click the button below to see which groups in WA state received these CARES Act funds through the Department of Commerce.