Farmers can become profitable from crop fields already harvested | Information

FRANKFORT- Farmers can now earn up to $ 10,000 by leasing their harvested fields for public pigeon hunting.

The Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources is now offering two programs that pay farmers to provide access to public pigeon hunting.

The division’s new Voluntary Public Access (VPA) Dove Fields program differs from the existing Cooperative Dove Field Program, which pays farmers to grow crops that attract pigeons and manage the fields for public pigeon hunting.

The VPA Dove Fields program seeks landowners willing to register harvested fields with enough seeds and grain by-products to attract pigeons. Kentucky Fish and Wildlife is interested in leasing these fields for public pigeon hunting.

Wildlife biologist Wes Little said the agency is always trying to increase hunting opportunities in ways that are relevant to local communities.

“With these new pigeon fields we can close the gaps,” he said. “There is a lot of land for hunting in the state WMAs (Wildlife Management Areas), but these are not always close to where our pigeon hunters live and work. Once included in the program, the harvested fields would be accessible for pigeon hunting like a WMA. “

Specific lease payments are based on the number of hectares registered, the type of crop and the number of days a landowner plans to participate in the program. The VPA Dove Fields program is aimed at hemp growers, both because of the burgeoning industry in Kentucky and because of the attractiveness of the crop to pigeons.

“Hemp grown for fiber or seed crops attracts as many pigeons as the best sunflower forage plots,” said Little.

Federal regulations prohibit hunting pigeons over areas where bait has been placed, but agricultural fields are a convenient and legal way to attract the birds. Other crops eligible for the program are silage crops such as corn, millet or milo and wheat intercrops grown in tobacco fields, all of which are known to attract pigeons. In certain situations, wheat seeds can also be sown as catch crops via the program.

The habitat surrounding a suitable arable field can also receive an additional payment per hectare if the landowner’s maximum has not been reached, but only if the hectares offered provide hunter parking or additional hunting land that improves the quality of public pigeon hunting access.

The pigeon hunting season starts on September 1st and is most popular on the opening day, weekends and public holidays. Landowners have several planning options to choose from when it comes to opening their land to the public. In addition, there are some requirements such as accessibility, location, proximity to cities and overall potential for success.

Kentucky has an applicable recreational use law (CRS 411.190). Landowners should consult their attorneys to better understand how this law applies to them.

For more information on either of the two pigeon field leasing programs, email Little at wes.little@ky.gov, or call 800-858-1549.

Pretend cash rip-off focusing on U-pick, farmers markets in Michigan, police say

CADILLAC, MI – The Traverse City area has been identified as a target of fraud / counterfeit money fraud circulating in Michigan.

According to the Michigan State Police, the scam consists of people ordering large quantities of fruit or products from local farmers markets, street stalls, and U-Pick farms and then paying with fake bills.

A recent incident involved a loss of $ 1,400 worth of products from a state store when the owner discovered the cash payment was fake, the MSP said.

The MSP encourage everyone involved in the sale of local products to be careful when handling large orders and cash payments, and to report suspicious activity to the local police force or a local Michigan State Police department.

No cash to assist stretch SNAP {dollars} at farmers markets in state price range – Albert Lea Tribune

By Tim Pugmire, Minnesota Public Radio News

Farmers’ markets are a staple summer in many Minnesota communities, but not everyone who shops there has the means to pay the farmers for what they grow.

A program called Market Bucks was designed to encourage some of these Minnesotans to use federal benefits – formerly called grocery stamps and now known as SNAP – to pay for healthy groceries at farmers’ markets. Participants will get a $ 10 game when they spend $ 10.

The program is particularly popular with seniors, said Colleen Moriarty, executive director of the nonprofit Hunger Solutions.

“It’s important because it helps people with limited access to food, the elderly and others, have more fresh fruits, vegetables, and Minnesota-grown products in their diets,” Moriarty said. “And that improves their health outcomes and improves access to food they might not otherwise have.”

The program doesn’t cost much compared to the total budget of $ 50 billion.

The DFL-controlled house put $ 325,000 in its draft agriculture budget for Market Bucks, but the Republican-controlled Senate had nothing. The position of the Senate prevailed in the negotiations. Senator Torrey Westrom, R-Elbow Lake, chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, presented the position to members of the finance committee.

“This program essentially enables the double-dip for everyone on SNAP,” Westrom said. “Overall, there are other priorities or areas that are also competing for funding.”

Senate minority leader Susan Kent, DFL-Woodbury, said she heard from farmers across the state who see Market Bucks as a valuable program. It should be a priority, said Kent.

“I don’t understand why it is twice that. I don’t understand, ”said Kent. “This feeds the people and makes feeding the people a priority. So I’m very disappointed. “

State Agriculture Commissioner Thom Petersen also expressed disappointment. Petersen told lawmakers that the state will lose federal funds if the program does not continue.

“We have to have this done by July 1st,” said Peterson. “So if a consideration can be given, or if we can find out, hundreds of thousands of dollars will be spent not only on those in need, but also on our farmers.”

Senator Mary Kiffmeyer, R-Big Lake, chair of the state government committee, noted that funding of the program was previously a responsibility of her committee. Negotiations on the state government bill are ongoing, and Kiffmeyer suggested that Market Bucks could be added to the bill.

“That’s currently $ 325,000,” said Kiffmeyer. “But we’ll see what we can do.”

Top legislatures want to conclude the special session in about a week. Hunger Solutions officials are now also looking for alternative financing. They are also circulating a letter signed by farmers’ markets, farming companies and other organizations calling on lawmakers to explore all options.

“It helps farmers,” said Colleen Moriarty. “And it supports the money that is being spent in the local communities.”

Farmers Market searching for dwell leisure

DOBSON – Surry County electrical customers don’t usually have a choice about their service provider – but the spirit of competition isn’t necessarily a good thing either, based on an unusual situation regarding a planned prison in Dobson.

Given the decision to place an order to power the new detention center with Duke Energy or Surry-Yadkin Electric Membership Corp. To forgive, the Surry Board of Commissioners opted for the latter, but in a separate decision.

This result reflects the concern of some commissioners that while the electrical cooperative will offer lower costs in the short term due to what one dissident calls “teaser rates”, the county taxpayers could face much higher long-term costs if they do not choose Duke .

“I’m not interested in teaser rates,” said Commissioner Eddie Harris of a special economic development fee that Surry-Yadkin had offered for seven years. He called it “intangible” and added that he was more focused on the decades to come.

“Eternity is a long time – that is forever.”

“Both are great companies, that’s not the point,” said Commissioner Van Tucker, who voted against the use of Surry-Yadkin during a meeting in Harris’ absence and was overruled by fellow Commissioners Bill Goins, Larry Johnson and Mark Marion.

At a later meeting, Tucker sided with Harris when he lost a motion attempting to reverse the action that resulted in a 3-2 vote.

“I think it’s about the best deal for the taxpayer,” added Tucker on Wednesday afternoon.

Based on the numbers compiled by Harris, he estimates that the average cost of using the Surry-Yadkin service would be $ 103,170 per year after seven years, compared to $ 93,579 for Duke Energy.

Marion, the chairman of the board, does not endorse this scenario and says he chooses to make guaranteed savings in the short term rather than gamble on possible lower interest rates from Duke later.

“It was child’s play for me, because nobody can predict the future,” said Marion on Wednesday afternoon.

“We’ll save $ 8,000 in the first year,” he said of the agreement asking Surry-Yadkin to reassess the interest rate situation after it ends.

Marion pointed out that market conditions make it difficult to predict the energy price outlook seven years from now, with what Duke might calculate then is an uncertainty today.

“Nobody knows,” said the CEO. “As the performance rate increases (in general), so will Duke.”

“No mans land”

The unusual situation that enables such a debate concerns the location of the new prison on land adjacent to the existing prison near the center of Dobson.

“It’s right behind it,” Harris said earlier this week.

Although each electricity supplier has a different presence in different areas of the county, the new prison location is said to be in a “no man’s land,” meaning that the county officials had a choice between the two.

In March, commissioners approved the issuance of up to $ 50 million limited liability notes in fiscal 2021-22 to build the prison and fund another project for Elkin City Schools. The detention facility makes up the largest part of it.

“It’s a $ 40 million project,” said Harris.

Almost everything else in town is powered by Duke Energy, according to the State Road Community commissioner, who acknowledged the cooperative powers some facilities like the Surry County Health and Nutrition Center near US 601.

Duke Energy already has infrastructure in place at the new prison location, including a substation “right there in the judicial center” nearby, which Harris says indicates another factor in Duke’s favor: reliability.

“It couldn’t be more reliable,” said Harris in particular about the proximity of the substation.

In the meantime, the nearest substation of the Surry-Yadkin Electric Membership Corp is located. in Salem Fork, about four miles as the crow flies.

The cooperative initially offered its discount rate for a five-year period, but apparently got wind that at least some of its board of directors were gravitating towards Duke Energy, Harris said. Surry-Yadkin then extended those two years and also said it would sell a generator to the county government at cost.

Harris says he has thoroughly researched the problem and navigated a maze of websites listing kilowatt hour charges and other complexities, and it is obvious that Duke Energy will be a “much cheaper” option after seven years. “I spent a fair amount of time on it.”

Duke cannot offer teaser pricing because the laws that govern it, which are different from those of the cooperative, require it to treat all customers equally, Harris said.

“By everyone’s analysis, Surry-Yadkin Electric Membership Corp. is more expensive to power and will cost taxpayers tens, if not hundreds, of dollars in the long run,” he said. “What you really need to do is compare apples to apples.”

Process in question

In addition to the financial implications of the electrical contract, Harris and Tucker have issues with the decision.

During a meeting of the commissioners on April 5, the district authority voted 3: 1 to award the electrical contract to the cooperative. This decision highlighted the fact that one of the five members was absent.

“I buried my mother that day,” announced Harris.

Another point of contention concerns the board of directors, who discuss the matter beforehand in a closed meeting, which is usually reserved, among other things, for highly sensitive questions regarding personnel or economic incentives for a new industry.

District Attorney Ed Woltz defended this discussion in a letter later in the month based on a provision of the North Carolina Open Gathering Act regarding bid information submitted by electric utilities. The attorney’s position is that this did not become public until the contract was awarded.

The law says that an elected body can hold a closed session on even the most delicate matters, not that it has to.

“I think it was big enough for taxpayers that we should have had an open discussion,” said Commissioner Tucker on Wednesday. “I think it’s about the best deal for the taxpayer.”

At another meeting on April 19, Harris spoke out at length against the measures taken earlier this month because they were not present at the time.

On April 19, there was also an attempt to cancel the contract with Surry-Yadkin, reflecting Harris and Tucker’s desire to conduct further studies. It failed in a 3-2 vote.

Following this action, it became known that Commissioner Marion’s father had a long relationship with Surry-Yadkin Electric Membership Corp. based in Dobson.

“I’m just going to say that Surry-Yadkin has always been a good company for the community,” Marion replied on Wednesday when asked about the relationship.

“My father, who worked there for 43 years, had no influence on how I voted.”

Not a closed deal?

Although two votes were cast on the matter, it may still not be set in stone, according to Tucker.

“It’s a deal if you vote and sign a contract.”

Tucker said it hadn’t happened since earlier this week.

“I don’t think it’s too late,” he said, saying that it is okay to change the current course of action, which Commissioner Harris agrees with.

“At first glance, it is simply wrong,” he said of the decision for the electrical service.

“That was wrong for many reasons.”

Pay farmers to chop carbon footprint

Fourth generation rancher Loren Poncia made Stemple Creek Ranch carbon positive. He has implemented rotary cattle grazing systems that allow the soil and grass to recover, put compost on pastures, and planted chicory that aerates the soil.

Courtesy Paige Green

president Joe Biden has urged US farmers to lead the way in offsetting greenhouse gas emissions in the fight Climate change – a goal that the fourth generation of the cattle breeder Loren Poncia wanted to achieve over a decade ago.

Despite his work in the beef sector, which is a huge contributor to global warming, Poncia has changed his Northern California Ranch into one of the few carbon positive livestock farms in the country.

“It’s a win-win – for the environment and for our paperback,” said Poncia, who is partnered with the Marin Carbon Project.

Experts estimate that through regenerative farming practices, farmers around the world can sequester enough of the carbon to avert the worst effects of climate change. Research suggests that carbon already present in the atmosphere is being removed and the soil is being replenished worldwide could lead to 10% carbon degradation. The United Nations warned against it Efforts to contain global emissions will be neglected without drastic changes in global land use and agriculture.

The Poncia ranch is sequestering more carbon than is released by processes like rotary cattle grazing systems, which allow the soil and grass to recover. It involves applying compost to pastures instead of chemical fertilizers to avoid tillage, build worm farms, and plant chicory to aerate the soil. Such climate-friendly projects have enabled Poncia to grow more grass and produce more beef.

“If we as a world want to undo the damage done, it is through agriculture and food sustainability,” said Poncia. “We are excited and positive about the future.”

While some farmers, ranchers, and foresters have already adopted sustainable practices that capture existing carbon and store it in the soil, others are concerned about up-front costs and uncertain yields that can vary by state and farm.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture recently said it would encourage farmers to adopt such sustainable practices. And more researchers and companies have started better quantify and manage Carbon stored in the soil.

USDA pushes for carbon cultivation

Tackling climate change has become a matter of survival for American farmers who have endured it great losses from floods and droughts which have become more common and more destructive across the country.

In 2019, farmers lost tens of thousands of acres in historic floods. And NASA scientists report that rising temperatures have pushed the western United States into the worst decade-long drought in the last millennium.

In the United States alone, the Environmental Protection Agency estimates that agriculture causes more than 10.5% of greenhouse gas emissions to warm the planet.

As a result, the Biden government now plans to steer $ 30 billion in agricultural aid from the USDA’s Commodity Credit Corporation to pay farmers to implement sustainable practices and capture carbon in their soil.

This file photo dated Monday, March 18, 2019 shows flood and storage tanks underwater on a farm along the Missouri River in rural Iowa north of Omaha, Neb.

AP Photo | Iowa Homeland Security and Emergency Management

Biden’s candidate for USDA Agriculture Secretary, Tom Vilsack, who has vowed to help at the meeting Biden’s broader plan to achieve a net-zero economy by 2050The money could be used to create new markets that stimulate producers to sequester carbon in the soil.

Former president Donald Trump previously tapped these funds Rescuing peasants harmed by its trade wars with China, Mexico, and Canada, which cut commodity prices.

Using the CCC money to create a carbon bank may not require Congressional approval and agricultural lobby groups are expected to convince Congress to expand the fund.

“It is a great tool for us to create a structure that will inform future farm bills of what is promoting carbon sequestration, what is promoting precision farming, what is promoting soil health and regenerating agricultural practices,” Vilsack told him Hearing to confirm the Senate this month.

Vilsack, who served as President Barack Obama’s Agriculture Secretary for eight years, has also asked Congress to set up an advisory group of farmers to help build a carbon market and ensure farmers get the benefits.

The government’s drive to promote on-farm carbon sequestration could support an emerging on-farm emissions reduction market and the technological advances that help farmers improve soil health and participate in carbon trading markets.

An emerging market

Some farmers have partnered with non-profit environmental and political groups to work on environmental sustainability. The movement was also increasingly supported by private companies.

Indigo Ag, A start-up committed to regenerative farming practices, companies like Barclays said JPMorgan Chase and Shopify are committed to buying agricultural carbon credits that will help farmers with transition costs.

Chris Harbourt, global director of carbon at Indigo Ag, said the company is working with growers to remove financial barriers during the transition and provide training on implementing regenerative farming practices like growing cover crops off-season or switching to no-till crops to offer.

“Growers who use regenerative practices see benefits that go well beyond financial ones,” said Harbourt. “The soil is healthier and more resilient, which creates more opportunities for profitable years, even in difficult weather conditions.”

More of CNBC environment::
Biden’s climate agenda will face major obstacles with an evenly divided Senate
Climate change has cost the US billions of dollars in flood damage

Erik Fyrwald, CEO of Syngenta, a Switzerland-based seed and crop protection company, said government policies must provide appropriate incentives for farmers to accelerate the transition to regenerative agriculture.

“The incentives must be sufficient and reliable enough to give farmers the confidence to make the necessary investments to implement these practices on their farm,” said Fyrwald.

Poncia, who has twice received government funding from the California Healthy Soil Program to implement sustainable practices on his ranch, hopes the administration can provide enough support to agriculture so that other people can achieve similar results.

“Agriculture wants to support this movement, but it needs help, education and the ability to reduce the risk,” said Poncia. “If the government supports the farmers who get good results, everyone else will follow.”