Daniel Craig and Léa Seydoux on the Type and Sentimentality of ‘No Time to Die’

You worked on this franchise for 15 years. What was the hardest parting from?

DC: I think to package the film. What I will miss most about Bond are the films. I never get used to it [the press tour]. It has always felt like a stranger to me and I’ve never felt completely comfortable with it. I love talking about the movie and I love talking about the making process of the movie and that’s what I’m really going to miss. Not many people get the chance to make Bond films, and I’ve had the privilege of doing five of them with the most extraordinary people, from Léa to the amazing crews and technicians. I will very much miss the kind of camaraderie and family atmosphere that we have on a Bond set.

What is it for you, Léa? You’re the first Bond girl to have a full story arc spanning multiple films. When you’re done spookDid you have any idea that Madeleine’s story would continue?

Léa Seydoux: No, I didn’t expect to come back. I actually thought Specter would be Daniel’s last film. But I was very happy to come back after five years, because we shot Specter a long time ago. It was very interesting to explore the same character, but this time with a different director. I loved the story of No Time to Die and the Bond and Madeleine relationship, and I was really happy that it was unconventional to work with this great material.

I realized that I call you a Bond girl, which in this case may be a little pared down.

DC: Back then I wanted to jump on you from a great height, but then I thought, no, I don’t want that. [laughs] I mean, let’s not be too serious about this, but we’ve tried to push that phrase out as much as possible.

What conversations did you have about how to define Madeleine’s character in this sense?

DC: I don’t think it was ever a conversation. When we put the films together and think about the plot, with any characters, when they’re not relevant, when they don’t mean anything, that they don’t affect the movie, and that goes over the board. So to say that the Bond girl should be there to serve this particular purpose feels archaic. All characters must have an influence. We want very strong female characters in the film because I think that makes the drama better. This is really a very selfish reason. Movies are boring if you only have characters who serve a certain ideal.

Opinion: Daniel Craig doesn’t plan to depart a lot cash to his youngsters when he dies

Now Daniel Craig’s children know how the rest of us feel when thinking about his legacy.

Disappointed.

The James Bond actor, who allegedly raised $ 25 million for the reopening of the role, has told Candis magazine in his native UK that he has no plans to leave much of his fortune to his two children.

“My philosophy is to get rid of it or give it away before you go,” Craig told the magazine. He cited a saying that “when you die rich you have failed” and called it “disgusting” to leave huge sums of money to your heirs.

If you’re the kid of one of the highest paid actors in the world, it’s the financial equivalent of starting with Casino Royale, arguably the greatest Bond movie ever made, and then ending with Skyfall and Specter being your correspondent for the two worst holds.

Maybe his kids knew that all along. So maybe their high hopes were not disappointed.

Craig isn’t the only rich man who says he has no plans to leave his fortune to his children. Billionaires Warren Buffett and Bill Gates said the same thing. On the other hand, everything is relative. Most people would be lucky enough to leave, say, a few hundred thousand dollars for their children. What you leave after the first million or two is moot.

It has been wisely argued that you must leave your children enough money so that they can do anything is much better for them than leaving them enough money to do nothing.

“My regular driving type would not fairly match the automotive”– Daniel Ricciardo is not appropriate to McLaren

“My normal driving style doesn’t quite match the car” – Daniel Ricciardo relied on his Red Bull driving style until McLaren made it difficult.

Daniel Ricciardo has made two significant career changes in the past two years, but his driving style has been largely the same as he chose at Red Bull since 2019 and the Australian is struggling to keep it up with the new team.

Ricciardo claims he escaped similar complications in Renault as he managed to keep the old driving style but at the expense of some grip.

“At Renault, I immediately felt that I could keep my old driving style, but simply had a little less grip than with the Red Bull car. Compared to McLaren, the differences to the car are a bit bigger, ”he said Auto engine and sport.

“It has its strengths and weaknesses, but somehow my normal driving style doesn’t quite match the car. It could be because of the braking or acceleration, but the car does not react as I am used to. “

“That is why my move to McLaren was a little more demanding than the move to Renault. The first step was to find out why my driving style wasn’t working in all corners and only then could I start working on new techniques that I had to master, ”concludes Ricciardo.

Daniel Ricciardo desperately wants to be back in shape

Ricciardo certainly does not take the disappointments in his first races with McLaren well as he still has to make up the gap against his younger teammate Lando Norris.

In a recent interview, the Australian even admitted that he might resent the sport if things continued in the same way. Ricciardo had terrible results in Baku and Monaco.

And he scored some points in France and Austria, but he still has more to do to reach McLaren’s P3 goal for this year.

Taylor Hill proclaims her engagement to Daniel Fryer | Leisure

Taylor Hill is engaged to Daniel Fryer.

The 25-year-old model visited Instagram to announce the news of her engagement through a heartfelt post on the photo sharing platform.

The brunette beauty posted a behind-the-scenes look at Daniel’s proposal and captioned it, “My best friend, my soul mate, I will always love you [heart and stars emojis] 06/25/21 [heart and stars emojis] (sic) “

Taylor has already received congratulatory messages from some of her showbiz friends, including Hailey Bieber.

The 24-year-old model, who is married to pop star Justin Bieber, replied: “Yayyyyyyy congratulations (sic)”

Shay Mitchell, the actress who became known as Emily Fields in “Pretty Little Liars,” also welcomed Taylor’s engagement news.

She responded to the announcement with a series of heart emojis.

Sara Sampaio also expressed her joy for the beloved duo.

The former Victoria’s Secret Angel replied, “Sooooo happy for you two [crying and heart emojis] (sic) “

Lais Ribeiro, another former Victoria’s Secret Angel, also congratulated her showbiz buddy after the announcement.

She wrote, “I’m so happy for you Tay, you deserve it [heart emojis] CONGRATULATIONS (sic) “

Taylor and Daniel were first seen together in public last February after breaking up with ex-boyfriend Michael Stephen Shank.

Taylor is one of the most iconic models in the world today, and she previously announced that she is determined to make a positive impact on young people.

She said, “With that voice, I would tell young girls not to worry about classmates. They will all be friends in 10 years.”

Taylor recognizes the opportunity she has to make a difference and wants her voice to be heard.

She explained, “They are actresses who touch people through their films and the amazing things they do. I can influence a younger generation by being role models and sharing my lifestyle and the things I love. “

Nobel winner Daniel Kahneman’s new ebook is all about your cash

A trader works in the S&P 500 pit on the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade of the CME Group.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Nobel Prize-winning psychologist and economist Daniel Kahneman has published a new book that asks a question that is central to making the right calls in the markets and in money: why everyone makes such bad decisions and what can we do about them to do?

“Noise” was co-written with Olivier Sibony, a French expert on decision-making, and Cass R. Sunstein, a legal scholar and expert on behavioral economics. Kahneman is one of the founding fathers of behavioral research and author of the seminal work “Thinking Fast and Slow”.

My rating of the Book is here::

I sat down with DR. Brad Klontz, a member of the CNBC Financial Wellness Council to get his response to Kahneman’s central thesis that prejudice and noise (random variability in our judgments) are ubiquitous in our lives, but there are ways we can improve our judgment skills. Dr. Klontz is a CFP and psychologist and author of several books, most recently “Money Mammoth” (Wiley, 2020).

CNBC: The central thesis of the book is that people – especially professionals like doctors, judges, and financial advisors – often make very bad judgments. Radiologists do not provide a consistent interpretation of X-rays. The judges do not give uniform judgments. Financial advisors are too confident in their advice. Do you agree?

Klontz: Yes. Being an expert in a particular field can make it harder to identify prejudice, be more resilient to change, and lead to greater harm.

CNBC: Kahneman says there are “bias” issues, where people are consistently focused on one point, like a bathroom scale that is always over two pounds. However, his focus is on “noise”, which he calls “random variability in judgments” where the decision-making is random and inconsistent. Why is this happening?

Klontz: Part of the problem is that people don’t recognize the randomness of their decision-making. But there are other reasons as well. Ironically, the variability of judgment has been one of the keys to our survival as a species, although it can backfire. Many decisions are not black and white. In primitive times and today, people could die from poor judgment, so there is some natural selection there.

This problem is well known in the field of psychology. For example, any attempt to measure things, such as personality traits or the effectiveness of drugs or therapies, is a random mistake. We use the scientific method and statistical analysis to reduce random errors, but it is always a threat to our attempt to understand the objective truth.

CNBC: Kahneman recommends several ways to combat bad decisions and noise. He talks about “decision hygiene” or ways to make more consistent judgments. Does this make sense?

Klontz: Yes. I love the concept of delaying intuition and not immediately reacting to your instincts. Open-mindedness is associated with success in almost all endeavors. Don’t trust your instincts. In my last book, Money Mammoth, I talked a lot about the “tribal brain,” which is the optimal way to deal with life in a group of around 150 people. This is how our ancestors lived. It helps explain why we should be suspicious of our instincts about money because the very same instincts that helped us survive and thrive in small groups under constant threat often backfire in our modern financial lives. When it comes to money, we are essentially wired to do everything wrong.

With everyone getting into cryptocurrency, we firmly believe that we should join them. On a deep psychological level, it feels like a threat to our survival not to step in.

For example, the herd instinct is good when you are in a primitive society. If everyone is fleeing from a lion, so should you. If you choose not to follow the herd and stand still, you will be eaten. Anyone who thought you should stand still while everyone else was running has been picked up and hasn’t passed their genes on to us.

While it has helped us survive throughout prehistory, the herd instinct is bad when making modern financial decisions. With everyone getting into cryptocurrency, we firmly believe that we should join them. On a deep psychological level, it feels like a threat to our survival not to step in. That is why we have to keep guessing and fighting our natural instincts. Always guess yourself, avoid over-consciousness and stay open-minded.

More of Invest in you:
The 2020 tax returns are due on May 17th with the IRS. Here are some last minute filing tips
Concerned about volatile markets? Experts say you should stick to your investment plan
“We’re not making a profit.” The hiring of crunch hurts small businesses

CNBC: So should we have less faith in our instincts?

Klontz: We would change our world if we had less confidence in our conclusions. We keep breaking up and surrounding ourselves with people who think like us. Sometimes our beliefs are so strong that we try to hurt people who believe differently. We need to be able to observe ourselves more objectively.

Less trust would reduce conflict because we are not so anchored in our subjective conclusions.

If we spend some time between our impulses and actions, we can calm our emotional brain and activate our prefrontal cortex – the part of our brain that helps us think about the consequences of our actions. It can also give us time to seek the opinions of others.

CNBC: Kahneman also recommends that companies conduct “noise audits” that assess how consistent the assessment is in their group, whether they are radiologists, judges, or stock pickers. Your reaction?

Klontz: It’s a great idea, and the only surprising thing is that it’s not done on a regular basis. This is known in psychology. This is known as interrater reliability, which recognizes that even experts can find it difficult to agree on their analysis and conclusions. For example, the gold standard in diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder focuses on training to ensure reliability between assessments and to ensure that everyone comes to the same conclusion. And I totally agree that it should be done elsewhere. We should put much more work into adopting established methods in psychology and generalizing them to all professions, especially those that involve life and death decisions like medicine or law.

CNBC: Kahneman recommends a stricter application of rule-based decision making to escape random human judgment. Do you agree?

Klontz: Yes, especially if there is a clear indication of a right or wrong decision as to how this person has a tumor or not. When there are clear choices about life or death, we need to limit the variability of judgment. I mentioned the autism diagnosis. Here you need a structured, reliable and rule-based approach.

But we cannot become too rigid or rule-bound and we have to be open. We need to recognize that the rules will change as our knowledge base grows and be open to changing those rules when the facts change.

Also, remember that many decisions and conclusions in life are completely subjective. The idea is not so much to eradicate the variability of human judgment as to grapple with its existence and the idea that we are prone to misjudgment. Consciousness and humility are key. Realizing that we can make different judgments depending on the time of day or lunch is an important step in making better judgments.

CNBC: In one of my favorite chapters, Kahneman found that people, especially professionals, have a very high opinion of their own opinion.

Klontz: Yes, that has an evolutionary advantage. Suppose you are convinced that a famine is coming and the other is convinced that there is no famine. If you get a famine, you will be fine because you planned, but the other one is gone. Believing in your own opinion and believing other people to join you has helped us survive as a species.

But in the modern world there can be overconsciousness. For example, women tend to outperform men as investors. You are not that prone to overconsciousness. Men believe that they can outperform and end up being able to trade more. The proof is that they can’t. Again, a healthy dose of self-doubt can be very good for us.

CNBC: Kahneman also delves into the discussion about why everyone is so bad at predicting the future.

Klontz: We all know that you can’t predict the future exactly for the reasons that Kahneman said: We are full of prejudice and noise, and there is an ignorance about the future because things happen that cannot be foreseen.

However, this does not prevent us from giving it a try, and it is important to understand why. This desire to predict the future is also an evolutionary advantage. It is necessary to try to predict the future because it has helped us survive as a species. It is important to our survival. Those who are forward-thinking and concerned about the future may have survived in the past.

But that doesn’t help us that much in the modern age. We didn’t evolve much from “light means the gods are angry”. Most of our decisions are made by our emotional brain, and we have a relatively small prefrontal cortex that carries out rational thinking beyond a large emotional brain – and when we are excited or scared, our emotional brain kicks in and we are prone to Acts like our prehistoric ancestors.

So we cannot rule out attempts to predict the future because we think about it all the time. It is important, however, that we do not place too much weight on our predictions and realize that they are merely our attempts to understand a chaotic world. It is important that we recognize the limits of our knowledge and feel a little more comfortable with uncertainty.

Rachael Leigh Cook dinner finalizes divorce from Daniel Gillies | Leisure

Rachael Leigh Cook and Daniel Gillies have finalized their divorce.

The 40-year-old actress ended her 15-year marriage to the ‘Vampire Diaries’ alum with whom she has Charlotte (seven) and Theodore (five) in June 2019, before officially filing legal documents for divorce last July, the received the TMZ on Wednesday (17.03.21). The former couple has now been declared legally unmarried.

Documents state that under the divorce settlement, Rachael is allowed to keep her own jewelry and designer clothes, as well as her 2020 Audi Q5, and have access to all rewards points on her credit cards, including frequent flyer miles.

Rachael also retains a property in Redondo Beach, California while the Studio City home she co-owned with Daniel is sold and the profits are split equally between the two.

The former couple will share the cost of their two cats and two dogs, and will also share legal and physical custody of their two children.

45-year-old Daniel is allowed to keep his own jewelry and clothing as well as a 2019 BMW X6.

Meanwhile, Rachael started her new romance with a man named Kevin who works as a swim coach.

In September she stated that she hadn’t said the word “friend” out loud and said, “I’m trying to be very cool, which I am not. I’m just trying to take it day in and day out and I have to be honest. I can’t even say it out loud, but I’ll try. I can’t tell, friend. I’m 40 and haven’t said that word since I was 22 years old. I was 23 when I married my ex so let me pronounce it out loud. “

Then she took a deep breath and added, “Friend. I’m a head case. He’s great and I just don’t have to screw it up. “