“Saygid’s Preventing Fashion Is Very Harmful” – Khabib Nurmagomedov Hypes up a Light-weight Fighter

Some of the best current MMA fighters are teammates with retired UFC champion Khabib Nurmagomedov. They fight for leading MMA promotions around the world and have a lot of success as well. One of those great fighters is Saygid Izagakhmaev. The Russian fighter has joined the ONE Championship and fought his first fight for promotion on January 14th.


The article continues below this ad


The article continues below this ad

He faced James Nakashima and successfully submitted him by a choke in the second round. He has an enviable MMA record of 20 wins and only 2 losses. In a recent video released by ONE Championship, ‘The Eagle’ was seen talking about Izagakhmaev. Khabib pointed out the aspects that make Izagakhmaev a dangerous opponent in the ring.

Khabib said“Saygid’s fighting style is very dangerous because he’s tall and has a long reach with his legs and arms. He has very good elbows, a good clinch and of course he is very good on the ground. Floor play and grappling, like all the boys from our school. When I looked at how he was a year ago and now, he’s very different. And he’s only 27 years old and he’s always learning.”

He also said, “I really, I really think he’s going to improve a lot with ONE Championship.”


“It Doesn’t Work That Way” – Dana White reveals the real reason he didn’t comply with Henry Cejudo’s request

in about 4 hours

It looks like Izagakhmaev is a well-rounded fighter with the ability to keep learning and growing. Plus, with a retired champion at his side, the fighter has everything he needs to dominate his division. Therefore, his future fights will surely be blockbusters.

What next for Khabib Nurmagomedov’s protégé?

Izagakhmaev’s fight against Nakashima was already tough. Only one fight old at ONE Championship, he faces several great opponents in the lightweight division. Also, the promotion would be a good platform to show the masses your uniqueness as a fighter.


The article continues below this ad

Khabib’s comments on Izagakhmaev show that Izagakhmaev can climb through the division and get to the very top. So it would be very interesting to see how this young fighter’s career develops.

Until then, curious fans can watch his debut fight for promotion.


The article continues below this ad

What do you think of Khabib Nurmagomedov exaggerates Saygid Izagakhmaev? Let us know in the comments below.

Check out this story: Calvin Kattar Net Worth: The Boston Finisher’s Five Biggest Fight Purses in UFC

Did you enjoy reading this article? Download our exclusive app for 24/7 coverage, the latest memes and social media banter. Click here to download.

WHO officers strive to determine why delta is a lot extra harmful than earlier Covid strains

This photo image shows a World Health Organization (WHO) logo on an Android phone.

Avishek Das | Getty Images

World Health Organization officials said they are still trying to understand why the Delta variant is more transmissible and potentially making people sicker than the original strain of coronavirus.

“We’re really trying to better understand why the Delta variant is more portable,” said Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO technical director for Covid-19, at a press conference on Friday. “There are certain mutations in the Delta variant that allow the virus, for example, to attach itself to a cell more easily. There are some laboratory studies that suggest that there is increased replication in some of the human respiratory systems modeled.”

In the past few weeks, new data on the highly transmissible strain has emerged around the world as scientists try to better understand the new threat. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warned lawmakers Thursday that new research suggests the Delta strain is more contagious than swine flu, the common cold and polio. It’s as contagious as chicken pox. It also appears to have a longer transmission window than the original Covid-19 strain and can make the elderly sicker even if they have been fully vaccinated.

The warning on Thursday came in a confidential document that Verified by CNBC and authenticated by the federal health authority.

“The virus itself is, as it begins, a dangerous virus. It is a highly transmittable virus. The Delta variant is even more, ”said Van Kerkhove. “It is twice as transferable as the ancestral tribes.”

WHO officials expect other dangerous variants to emerge as countries struggle to distribute the life-saving vaccines to their populations.

“They get fitter the more they circulate, and therefore the virus is likely to become more transmissible because they develop in such a way that they change over time,” said Van Kerkhove.

She said it is imperative that nations follow public health measures like social distancing and the wearing of masks as nations distribute more vaccines around the world, especially those with the lowest vaccination rates.

We need “around 70% coverage worldwide to really slow down transmission and reduce the risk of new variants appearing,” said Dr. Bruce Aylward, Senior Advisor to the WHO Director General.

However, given current trends, health professionals are not optimistic. “This will not be the last variant of the virus you will hear us talk about,” said Van Kerkhove.

Biden says delta Covid variant is ‘significantly harmful’ for younger individuals

President Joe Biden speaks in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington on Friday, June 18, 2021, regarding the achievement of 300 million COVID-19 vaccinations.

Evan Vucci | AP

president Joe Biden on Friday doubled his government’s request to Americans to get vaccinated Covid-19 The warning against the highly transferable delta variant appears “particularly dangerous” for young people.

“The data is clear: if you are not vaccinated, there is a risk that you will become seriously ill or die or spread,” Biden said during a White House press conference.

Delta, the variant of Covid identified for the first time in India, “will make unvaccinated people even more vulnerable than it was a month ago,” he added. “It’s a more easily transmissible, potentially more deadly, and particularly dangerous variant for young people.”

Biden said that young people can best protect themselves by getting fully vaccinated.

“Please, please, when you have a shot, get the second shot as soon as you can,” he said.

The president’s remarks are his administration’s newest goal – to partially vaccinate 70% of U.S. adults by July 4th – is well on the way to missing as the vaccination rate slows down.

The chief scientist of the World Health Organization said on Friday that Delta to become the world’s dominant strain of the disease. This is due to its “significantly increased transferability,” said Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, WHO senior scientist, during a press conference.

Studies suggest that Delta is about 60% more transmissible than Alpha, the variant first identified in the UK that was more contagious than the original strain that emerged from Wuhan, China in late 2019.

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, also said Friday that she expects Delta to become the predominant variant in the United States and urged people to get vaccinated. The variant now accounts for 10% of all new cases in the US, up from 6% last week, according to data from CDC.

“As worrying as this Delta strain is about its hypertransmittance, our vaccines are working,” Walensky told ABC’s Good Morning America. If you get vaccinated, “you will be protected against this Delta variant,” she added.

Health experts say the Delta strain is of particular concern for young people, many of whom do not yet need to be vaccinated. While scientists still don’t know if Delta is causing more serious symptoms, there are signs that it could cause different symptoms than other variants.

Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, said the Delta variant essentially replaced Alpha, the variant that swept Europe and later the US earlier this year. He said as the virus continues to mutate, the US will need a higher percentage of the vaccinated population.

“How much more information do we need to see this virus mutate and create viruses that are more contagious?” said Offit, also a member of the FDA’s Advisory Committee on Vaccines and Related Biological Products. “We have to vaccinate now. Let everyone vaccinate now.”

According to the CDC, as of Friday, more than 176 million Americans, or 53.1% of the population, had had at least one injection. More than 148 million Americans are fully vaccinated, according to the agency.

States have offers Incentives from free beer to $ 1 million worth of lotteries to convince Americans to get a prick.

On Friday, Biden announced some of these incentives, including the fact that most pharmacies offer 24-hour service on select days in June.

How American-Fashion Federalism Is Harmful to Our Well being

Now that widespread vaccinations have started to ease the terror of COVID-19, it is time to look back on what we learned. Under the headlines is an important question: Have Americans suffered more than necessary under the nation’s federal system?

Unfortunately, the answer is yes: the federalism practiced in the United States was unhealthy. The coronavirus death rate in the United States ranks fifth among the largest nations in the worldbehind Italy and the United Kingdom, but well ahead of France, Sweden, Chile, Austria, South Africa and Russia.

The US went into the pandemic with a public health system and national health authorities that much of the world envied. The virus hit the American coast with a fair warning so there was an opportunity to prepare. And as the pandemic progressed, many of the worst coronavirus variants hit this country later than other countries, giving us an opportunity to learn from the experiences of others. But the virus has ravaged the country and undermined the excellent reputation of the country’s public health system.

In March 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci, he expected the pandemic could kill 100,000 to 200,000 AmericansNumbers that looked stunning at the time. More than a year later, the number is approaching 600,000. The Lancet, the British medical journal, has been published an analysis Last February it was concluded that 40 percent of deaths would be preventable if the US had followed the same course as other major industrialized nations. Andrew Atkeson, a UCLA economist, argued that with better testing, masking, and social distancing, American deaths could have been kept to less than 300,000. Even the Trump administration’s coronavirus coordinator, Dr. Deborah Birx, completed that hundreds of thousands of deaths could have been prevented.

So it’s impossible to avoid the conclusion that America could have done much better in the fight against COVID-19. A bigger debate is whether American-style federalism was particularly to blame.

Among the federal systems, similar to our own, where powers are divided among the levels of government, the death rate was higher in Brazil, but the US ranked second, higher than Mexico, Germany, Switzerland and Australia. The death rate in the US was almost three times higher than that in Canada.

It would be a reasonable guess that, due to shared authority, federal systems are more struggling with COVID-19 than unitary systems, where central governments make most of the decisions. But this assumption does not work. Uniform systems such as that of the United Kingdom, France, Israel and Denmark did not show any significant differences in the pandemic. Even more central federal systems like India and Brazil did not perform better than more decentralized systems like Switzerland and the US

Americans suffered more from COVID-19 because the decentralized system of federalism simply failed to meet the challenge. Instead of asserting Washington’s authority, President Donald Trump chose to divert measures against the states. Governance varied widely, from states like Florida and Texas, whose governors had to be dragged into masking and social distancing, and who fought local shutdowns, to states like Washington and Oregon, who became national leaders after the first few weeks of the virus Toll. A look around the globe shows that the most successful nations were those with strong national hand control policies, with an equally strong commitment of local governments in partnership to national policy.

COVID-19 affected every part of the United States, but not all parts equally. It has proven itself six times more deadly in New Jersey, New York and Massachusetts than in Alaska, Vermont and Hawaii. As with so many other political issues, the likelihood of Americans dying from COVID-19 depended heavily on where they lived. Rhode Island’s death rate is similar to that of Arizona, and that of Maryland is almost the same as that of Kentucky. In between, Delaware is almost identical to Kansas. The data does not contain a red / blue status pattern.

Death rate from COVID-19 per 100,000 people as of May 21, 2021


But the variations frame a great mystery. Has the Trump administration’s aggressive efforts to push big decisions to states made the crisis worse, forcing so many states to keep reinventing the wheel, wasting valuable time and making more Americans suffer? Or did it help the country’s overall response because at least some states were able to break away from the others and put in place more aggressive pandemic control policies that also helped protect them from the inaction of the national government?

There is no doubt that some states and municipalities have used this flexibility to tremendous advantage. One of the hardest hit cities, Seattle, became a national model over time. In fact, if every local government and state had followed their example, the death toll would have halved and 300,000 Americans would still be alive today.

This is a powerful argument in support of Justice Louis Brandeis’ argument that states are laboratories of democracy. But in general, states have not shown very good laboratories at dealing with the pandemic. Writing about his own government’s response in Switzerland, Danny Buerkli, co-founder of a government reform laboratory, made a strong point that is even more true of the US: he wrote, “Experiment a lot” but “learn very little”. In the US, there was simply no mechanism for collecting nationally what the states and their cities were learning, and this hampered the American response. In fact, one of the most profound breakdowns in the United States was not even realizing that this was an essential question in dire need of a solid answer. This, in turn, weakened the national hand on the COVID-19 steering wheel and the ability of states to function as real laboratories.

The same challenges are now flowing into the Campaign to Vaccinate Americans, where big differences emerge again. There are large differences in income, class, and race in who is vaccinated, but there are others major socio-economic drivers also: States with a higher percentage of uninsured residents have a lower vaccination rate. The higher the proportion of residents with good internet access, the higher the vaccination rate. Both indicators reflect problems with access to health care in general, the registration process for vaccinations in particular, and greater inequalities in health care across the country.

This is the most fundamental problem with the American response to COVID-19. The country has massive inequalities, which COVID-19 demonstrated and, in turn, accelerated the pandemic. Federalism has proven to be detrimental to health, largely because it has helped widen the gap between health and belongings in American society.

The only way to reduce this national divide is to act nationally in close partnership with states. We are further away from it now than ever before. Not only does this threaten broader efforts to reduce inequality in the US, but it also prepares us for another fall when the next pandemic inevitably occurs.

Governing’s columns of opinion reflect the views of their authors, and not necessarily those of the editors or management of Governing.

Group braves harmful temps to lift cash for homeless vets

The group brave dangerous temperatures to raise money for homeless vets

The second annual sleepout for veterans in the American Legion in Hartland continued on Saturday – sleeping outside for two nights, even if it’s below zero.

Dangerously cold temperatures resulted in many people canceling outdoor activities for the weekend, but a group in Hartland continued their event on Saturday, February 13th.

On a night like Saturday when Temperatures were approaching zero Degree, it was cold even when a big fire roared. Even so, a group of men chose to sleep outside to honor those who had no choice – and cancellation wasn’t an option.

For around 20 people, tents and boxes are the place to sleep or at least try to sleep on Saturday evening. It was the second annual sleepout for veterans in the American Legion in Hartland – sleeping outside for two nights, even if it’s below zero.

“We want to create real awareness of what our veterans go through when they’re homeless,” said Mark Pape, American Legion’s sons in command.

Sleepout for veterans in Hartland

The event raises funds for various organizations that help homeless veterans. It involves collecting a truckload of donations for the Milwaukee Homeless Veterans Initiative.

“When we come across a veteran who is homeless, who may be living in his car or outside, like the weather we are experiencing today, we take that financial resource and bring it to a hotel while we work to find a permanent partner Finding shelter for them, “said Debbie Buchanan, the initiative’s executive director.

Milwaukee Homeless Veterans Initiative

Buchanan said the need would be even greater after a year like 2020. The number of veterans who came through their doors increased by 30%.

As a result, some of the coldest nights of the season didn’t freeze the Saturday night event.

“We won’t cancel because of the weather, will the homeless cancel because it’s cold?” Said Pape.

Sleepout for veterans in Hartland

The event will raise funds through Sunday, February 14th, 12:00 noon.

ON Wind Chill Advisory is in effect for all of Southeast Wisconsin Saturday through Sunday noon. During this time, bitter cold swings through, when temperatures drop well below -5 ° F and wind chill exceeds -20 ° F or colder.

FREE DOWNLOAD: Get the latest news notifications in the FOX6 News App for iOS or Android.

GOP Sen. says Trump impeachment trial may set a harmful precedent

Ohio Republican Senator Rob Portman told CNBC why he had joined 44 other Republicans to deny the constitutionality of the charges against former President Donald Trump.

“I think the constitutional question needs to be addressed and not tabled and not put aside, and as a juror I will listen to both sides, but we have to deal with the constitutional question and the precedent that would create. So if you look at the constitution … it’s about the distance, and this is a private person now, Donald Trump, not a president, “Portman said during a pre-recorded interview Thursday night “The news with Shepard Smith.”

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul initiated charges of dismissing the constitutionality of the trial. Firstly, on the grounds that Trump is no longer in office, and secondly, given that the Senate President Patrick Leahy (D-VT) is presiding over the process in place of the Supreme Court Justice John Roberts becomes.

Roberts led Trump’s first impeachment trial, but he won’t repeat the role a second time. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer from New York told Rachel Maddow of MSNBC Show on Monday that the decision to chair it was Roberts’.

“The constitution says that the chief judge presides over a seated president,” said Schumer. “So it won’t be so – so it was up to John Roberts to see if he wanted to preside over a president who is no longer in office, Trump. And he doesn’t want to do it.”

Portman told host Shepard Smith he was concerned about the precedent this impeachment trial could set.

“Think about the precedent of saying that Republicans could go after President Obama or President Clinton or Democrats George W. Bush as a private citizen,” Portman said.

Portman had previously specified that Trump has “some responsibility” for the January 6th uprising in the Capitol. He did not support Trump’s efforts to scrap the 2020 election results and voted to maintain the certified January 6 election results and delayed the count.

Smith pressed Portman on what he thought was an appropriate punishment for Trump.

“A proper consequence, as I have said very clearly, is that people speak before, openly and during and after, and I think that it is also important that the House acted, so there have been consequences that way . ” said Portman.

Portman announced that he will not seek re-election next year, but will serve his term until January 3, 2023. He said he “will not miss out on politics and partisanship, and that will get more difficult over time.” “”