‘Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings’ overview: What critics say

Simu Liu plays Shang-Chi in Marvel’s “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings”.


Marvel’s latest hero hits theaters on September 3rd and he’s “magnetic,” critics say.

To be seen exclusively in cinemas next Friday, Disney’s “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings” revolves around Shang-Chi, a servant in a posh hotel called Shaun, an Americanized version of his name. He is the son of Wenwu, a centuries-old conqueror, crime boss and bearer of the legendary 10 rings.

After his mother’s death, a teenager Shang-Chi left his ancestral home and remained estranged from his father for years. Now, as an adult, he has to face his past and his father.

With a 91% “Fresh” score on Rotten Tomatoes out of 105 reviews, those who have seen expanded screenings of Disney’s newest comic strip call it a “total crowd pleaser. Period.”

“At some point during one of the best chases in San Francisco film history, ‘Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings’ makes at least one thing gloriously clear: Today you can get your money’s worth in the cinema,” wrote Peter Hartlaub in his review of the film for the San Francisco Chronicle.

In addition to the action-packed battle sequences and funny one-liners that have become indispensable in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, “Shang-Chi” explores the clash of East and West – tradition and modernity – on a large, explosive scale.

Critics largely praised the cast of the film, of which Tony Leung stood out as a villainous but charming wenwu. Simu Liu, the eponymous Shang-Chi, is “magnetic” during the action sequences and Awkwafina shines as his quick-talking, funny best friend Katy.

“Shang-Chi” will be the first Marvel movie to hit theaters exclusively since then Covid pandemic closed the cinema business in March 2020. Industry analysts are excited to see how the film fares on the opening weekend and whether positive reviews and word of mouth will give it staying power at the box office.

This is how critics thought of “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings” before its cinema debut on September 3rd:

Katie Rife, AV Club

Critics praised “Shang-Chi” for its elaborate stunt and fight sequences, which are borrowed from classic martial arts films.

“In a way, ‘Shang-Chi’ is a mixtape of martial arts film genres: an early scene pays tribute to the balletic, graceful films of Zhang Yimou, while a dramatic bus chase later mimics the daring of an early Jackie Chan vehicle,” wrote Katie Rife in her review for AV Club.

Many have pointed to an early scene in the film where Shang-Chi battles multiple enemies in a crowded bus, as a prime example of these influences.

Even so, Marvel seems to be beating, Rife wrote.

“‘Shang-Chi’ insists on either pausing or burying the stunt work – led by Chan protégé Brad Allan, who tragically died earlier this month – with mountains of blatant CGI,” she said.

Read the full review from AV Club.

Tony Leung plays Wenwu in Marvel’s “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings”.


Angie Han, the Hollywood reporter

“It doesn’t take long for ‘Shang-Chi’ to set its terms,” ​​Angie Han wrote in her review for The Hollywood Reporter.

The film begins in China with narration and dialogue that is entirely in Mandarin with subtitles. Only when the film jumps several minutes in its running time to San Francisco is even a single word of English spoken.

“Even in 2021, when subtitles are hardly an exotic experience for most moviegoers, the decision to use them in the opening scenes of an American blockbuster sends a message,” she wrote.

Han noted that “Shang-Chi”, with its magical forests and mysterious ancient artifacts, sometimes “hardly feels like a superhero movie.” And that’s good.

Still, the film is full of Marvel tropes, including hilarious, self-deprecating humor, which Han says brings the characters back to earth, but also takes “some of its wonders” away from the film.

Read the full review from The Hollywood Reporter.

Shirley Li, The Atlantic

The most prominent part of almost every Rotten Tomatoes review is Tony Leung. As one of Asia’s biggest movie stars, this is Leung’s first Hollywood film – and he’s stealing the show.

Wenwu is the antagonist of “Shang-Chi”, but he is more of an antihero than a villain. The 10 rings made him immortal and love led him to give up his powers. The loss of his wife, however, leads him into a deep spiral of grief.

“To root Wenwu’s motives in heartbreak rather than domination, destruction or vengeance feels unique for a Marvel film: Shang-Chi’s central conflict goes beyond the classic of good versus evil and far beyond that of a son who deals with it argues with his father, ”wrote Shirley Li in her review for The Atlantic.

The film may be called “Shang-Chi,” but for Li, as other critics argue, this is Wenwu’s and Leungs’ film.

“Not only is he the star of the movie’s opening – in his hands, Wenwu’s havoc catalyzes the action and permeates every frame, making the film a tragedy,” she wrote. “He becomes the character everyone else revolves around, whether he’s on the scene or not. After all, that’s how grief works, it shines.

Read the full review from The Atlantic.

Meng’er Zhang, Simu Liu and Awkwafina star in Marvel’s “Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings”.


Brian Truitt, USA today

However, the main role of “Shang-Chi” is not without its own charm.

Simu Liu, best known for his portrayal of Jung on the Canadian sitcom “Kim’s Convenience,” may be relatively unknown in America, but he “is just a joy to watch,” wrote Brian Truitt in his review of “Shang-Chi”. “

“He’s the MCU’s most significant and contagious rookie since the late Chadwick Boseman with the same face-of-the-franchise appeal as Chris Evans,” he wrote.

Truitt said Liu has a “subtle charm” that draws audiences into the film, even when magical creatures and supernatural artifacts bring him to the realm of the fantastic.

“Robert Downey Jr. and his lead actor Tony Stark have now disappeared from the Marvel films,” wrote Truitt. “Fortunately, they have found a suitable successor in the unjustifiably charismatic Simu Liu and his dragon-riding, powerful alter ego.”

Read the full USA Today review.

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC. NBCUniversal owns Rotten Tomatoes.

‘We Do not Wish to Lose Cash’ – Pep Guardiola Delivers Robust Response to Man Metropolis Spending Critics

The Premier League champions expect a sensational fall for Tottenham striker Harry Kane after securing the arrival of Aston Villa’s Jack Grealish for a club record £ 100m in early August.

Ahead of the Manchester team’s league opener against Tottenham on Sunday, the Catalan coach was asked about the Liverpool manager’s remarks on the way several top English clubs invested in their squads during the summer transfer window.

Chelsea broke their own record transfer amount by signing Inter Milan’s Romelu Lukaku for £ 97.5m, while Manchester United spent more than £ 110m to win Jadon Sancho and Raphaël Varane ahead of the new season.

CONTINUE READING: The city is “confident” to get the second £ 100 million signature this summer

CONTINUE READING: Midfielder is approaching City exit with Serie A as a target

“I don’t judge other clubs by what they do; they do what they believe. Some owners want to profit, our owners don’t,” Guardiola said in his pre-game press conference, quoted by Manchester evening news.

“You want to reinvest in the team. We invest what we can invest. We could spend £ 100m on Jack Grealish because we sold for £ 60m. In the end we spent £ 40m (net) the club said to me. I don’t know what will happen in the future. “

City’s antics in the transfer market have come under heavy scrutiny over the years, but Guardiola insisted that the Premier League champions abide by Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules.

CONTINUE READING: City fans recognize a possible important striker transfer tip during training

CONTINUE READING: Riyad Mahrez gives an honest admission of the performances in 2020/2021

The 50-year-old added, “We have limits to financial fair play. If you (the city’s transfer critics) disagree, you can file a statement in court and we will defend ourselves. Financial fair play is the rule.” for us, and we absolutely obey the rules, what happened in the end was that we were innocent in 2014, I believe, and we are now in 2021.

“Every season we (City) pass the FFP. I say the same thing, there are owners who want the advantage for themselves. Our club, of course, they don’t want to lose any money, if they can spend money we can do that.” A few years ago other clubs would always spend a lot of money for a lot on multiple players.

“We (the city) spend because we can, we don’t spend if we can’t. In the end, we have to present the balance sheet and say that is who we are, what we have and what we can do . “

Follow us on Twitter for live updates: @City_Xtra

What critics considered M. Evening Shyamalan’s thriller

Thomasin McKenzie and Alex Wolff star in M. Night Shyamalan’s “Old”.


M. Night Shyamalan’s latest film “Old” is not lacking in intrigue and tension, but it does not do justice to the director’s previous work, critics say.

His latest thriller follows the family of four Guy (Gael Garcia Bernal), Prisca (Vicky Krieps) and their children Maddox (11) and Trent (6) on a tropical vacation. The family ventures to a secluded beach at the suggestion of the resort manager, but quickly realizes that the idyllic location is somehow aging them quickly.

The beach is also frequented by the rapper mid-size Sedan, the surgeon Charles and his family with wife Chrystal, little daughter Kara and mother Agnes, and married couple Jarin and Patricia. On top of the terror, the group has severe headaches that cause a power outage if they try to leave the area.

Critics agreed that “Old” isn’t Shyamalan’s best work, but it is nowhere near his worst. The director is famous for his surprising twists and turns and surprising endings, which range from ingenious (“The Sixth Sense”) to silly (“The Happening”). “Old” seems to be somewhere in between.

That Universal Film currently has a 55% “Rotten” score on Rotten Tomatoes from 153 reviews. This is how critics thought of Shyamalan’s “Old” before its debut on Friday.

Peter Travers, ABC News

The premise of “Old” is enticing, wrote Peter Travers in his review of the film for ABC News. The problem is that once it captivates you, it struggles to hold your attention for its entire duration.

“With a poet’s eye and a keen ear for dialogue, this suspense thriller is a provocation that Shyamalan lacks the ability to develop much less sustain,” said Travers.

“Old” is based on a graphic novel called “Sandcastle” which follows a similar premise but leaves the mystery of the supernatural beach open. In adapting the material, Shyamalan added his own explanation for the strange occurrences.

Some critics thought the reveal (which we don’t want to spoil here) was a harmless addition to the fable, while others, like Travers, thought the concept “lame” and distracting from the film.

“You leave ‘Old’ and wonder how a brilliant premise can end with such a botched job,” wrote Travers.

Read the full review from ABC News.

Rufus Sewell in M. Night Shyamalan’s “Old.”


Robert Daniels, IGN

Critics like Robert Daniels from IGN were quick to point out how beautifully “Old” is shot. Daniels praised cinematographer Mike Gioluakis for his creativity in capturing horror on screen. He found that the aging effects and make-up were also achieved well by the special effects team.

However, stiff conversations and clumsy presentation in the character’s dialogues left something to be desired, he wrote.

“‘Old’ works best when it focuses on the horror of young people who experience the ravages of old age long before their time,” Daniels wrote in his review. “Strong performances by the entire cast manage to cover up what is possibly the worst and most rhythmically least believable dialogue in M. Night Shyamalan’s career, aside from his gritty live action ‘Avatar: The Last Airbender’.”

Many of the “amateur” explanations remained better than mysteries, he wrote.

“Still, ‘Old’ is just as deep as any thriller Shyamalan has ever made,” said Daniels. “It’s a movie that probably doesn’t deserve repeated consideration, but the first is a thought-provoking meditation on what it means to be alive that evokes dark, buried emotions like the water that kisses the sand.”

Read the full review from IGN.

Todd Gilchrist, The Wrap

Dialogue wasn’t the only criticism mentioned in the reviews of “Old”. Todd Gilchrist of The Wrap said the characters in the film “feel like they were developed by some kind of algorithm in a script program”.

“Among the ensemble stranded on the beach are a museum curator, an actuary, a thoracic surgeon, a nurse and a psychologist; each of them could just as well have been named after their profession, because Shyamalan not only assembles them with mechanical precision but also filters every situation in the story through the expertise they offer, guaranteeing a comical burst of exposure at every turn to judge how or why the circumstances have changed, “he wrote in his review of the film.

The actuary does a lot of tedious numbers tweaking, the psychologists encourage others to speak up about their feelings, and the characters react to situations in strange, unrealistic ways, he said. Many reviewers said that the audience might have been more emotionally involved in their life-or-death situations if these characters had been better elaborated.

“As is more and more the case in his films, Shyamalan is too busy with the machinery of his ideas to put them to a sniff test before we let them loose on characters who should or could interest us if only they would make decisions that would be remotely identifiable, ”said Gilchrist.

Read the full review of The Wrap.

Thomasin McKenzie and Gael Garcia Bernal star in M. Night Shyamalan’s “Old”.


Adam Graham, Detroit News

Like many critics, Detroit News’s Adam Graham notes that “Old” is one of Shyamalan’s better films, but it falls short of previous hits like “The Sixth Sense” and “Signs”.

“The problem is, well, Shyamalan, who overwhelms himself with flashy camera work and messes up the atmosphere he creates with his clunky writing,” he wrote in his review. “Every time you’re in, he pulls you out again.”

Graham found the ending disappointing too, saying, “It’s hard to deliver a Doozy when the audience is trained to know you’re going to get the hell out of it.”

Read the full review from Detroit News.

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of CNBC and NBCUniversal. NBCUniversal owns Rotten Tomatoes and is the distributor of “Old”.

Promising Younger Girl dominates 20201 Hollywood Critics Affiliation Awards | Arts & Leisure

“Promising Young Woman” was the big winner of the 2021 Hollywood Critics Association Awards.

Emerald Fennell’s black comedy starring Carey Mulligan as Cassie Thomas dominated the evening and won several awards including “Best Picture” and “Best Actress” for the 35-year-old star.

Receiving her awards on video call Carey said, “This opportunity really was the chance of a lifetime and I am so grateful to her.”

The director and screenwriter also won Best Original Screenplay, Best First Feature, and Best Filmmaker On The Rise.

Emerald, also 35, said of the earlier honor, “It just seems extraordinary that this script that I had on my mind for years listened to Paris Hilton and Britney Spears until it all had a pink, sparkling blur for it to come all the way to Hollywood and to receive this incredible honor is truly extraordinary. “

The thriller follows a young woman who was traumatized by a tragic event in her past and seeks revenge on those who have crossed her path.

During the virtual ceremony on Friday evening (March 5th, 21st) greats like “Nomadland”, “Sound of Metal”, “Da 5 Bloods”, “The Invisible Man”, “Birds of Prey” and “Minari” were honored. .

A number of special awards were also presented, including the Trailblazer Award given to Dwayne ‘The Rock’ Johnson.

The wrestler-turned-actor was recognized for “advocating important issues and advocating change”.

A clip played showing the ‘Jumanji’ star’s efforts to support the Black Lives Matter movement and highlight his charitable work.

Moved by the video, he said, “My friends, who I have known and grown with, all of you over the years as we have walked this trail – and what a privilege it was and what an honor it was it was to receive that honor from you. “

Elsewhere, Zack Snyder took home the Valiant Award and the Impact Award went to ‘Judas And The Black Messiah’.

The latter follows the story of Black Panther Party chairman Fred Hampton (Daniel Kaluuya) and FBI infiltrator William O’Neal (Lakeith Stanfield).

Scott Menzel, Founder of HCA, said in a statement: “While 2020 has been a difficult year for many people around the world, we are the filmmakers, storytellers and studios who have gone out of their way to find new ways to meet their To publish films to forever grateful audience. The films nominated by members of the Hollywood Critics Association were some of the most diverse and comprehensive stories we have seen on screen in quite some time. Our mission has always been to highlight all of the votes and I believe this will be reflected in our winners tonight. Congratulations everyone. “

Overlook The Cash, Ignore Critics, Suppose Huge

This article was kindly made available to us EVANNEX, who manufactures and sells Tesla aftermarket accessories. The opinions expressed are not necessarily our own at InsideEVs, nor have we paid for them EVANNEX to publish these articles. We find the company’s perspective as an aftermarket supplier of Tesla accessories interesting and are happy to share its content for free. Enjoy!

Published on EVANNEX on February 1st, 2021 by Charles Morris

Lists of business tips from Elon Musk has long been a favorite subject of the corporate media, and the genre has become even more important since Elon’s net worth grew to over $ 185 billion richest person in the world.

If you follow Elon’s advice, can you repeat his success? Well, we’ll see – but even if you don’t revolutionize the auto industry or start a colony on another planet, you may learn some ways to improve your productivity and, more importantly, achieve some of the things you really think are important.

The latest addition to Elon Musk’s “Secrets to Success” canon underscores Iron Man’s emphasis on meaningful projects aimed at creating a better world, not just piles of money. Justin Rowlatt, who writes for the BBC, attends an interview he did with Musk a few years agoand notes that the lessons Elon imparted are as relevant today as they were then.

The key to understanding Elon Musk’s agenda and what sets him apart from the everyday billionaire you might meet on the street is that making money was never his ultimate goal. As a young man, Elon identified three areas that he believes are “important issues that would most affect the future of mankind,” as Michael Belfiore reported in his 2007 book Rocketeers. “One was the internet, one was clean energy, and one was space.” Young Musk understood that it would take decades to distinguish himself in these areas, and since then he has focused on these areas.

As Musk Rowlatt said, he has nothing against the pursuit of wealth “if it is done ethically and well,” but he does not count his successes in dollars and cents. In fact, he doesn’t expect to die rich – he plans to invest most of his fortune in establishing the first Mars colony.

“They want things to get better in the future,” Musk told Rowlatt. “They want these new exciting things that make life better.”

Elon founded SpaceX out of frustration with the shy and ambitious goals of the US space program. “I’ve always expected that we would advance beyond Earth and take a person to Mars, have a base on the Moon, and go into orbit very often.”

Musk may not crave money in itself, but he has a good understanding of how finance interacts with technology to determine what is and is not done. He quickly realized that the slow pace of Terran space exploration was not due to a lack of interest, but rather to the prohibitive cost of space travel. SpaceX (and Tesla) it was about cutting costs and finding more economical ways to use the technology we have to achieve a bigger goal.

And his goals are big indeed – so big that shy souls have often described them as science fiction stuff. But, as many others besides Musk have observed, modern institutions, both corporations and governments, appear to be structured to reward incremental progress and adventurous goals in a small space.

Above: Elon Musk discusses inspiration (YouTube: The not so boring man)

“If you’re the CEO of a large company and you’re looking for a modest improvement that takes longer than expected and doesn’t work quite as well, no one is going to blame you,” he tells Rowlatt. “If you are brave and want a real breakthrough improvement and it doesn’t work, you will definitely get fired.” This explains why (to take just one example) older automakers find it sufficient to make small improvements to their vehicles once a year.

Obviously, Musk doesn’t mind incremental improvements (both Tesla and SpaceX are continually making small improvements to improve efficiency or reduce costs), but he’s not afraid to imagine and develop entirely new products and new business models.

Big thinking naturally means big risks. In 2008, he made a dramatic decision that went down in business history. The launch of the roadster had failed, one of the SpaceX rockets had not reached orbit, the exchange was in the tank and Tesla had “cash worth about a week in the bank”. Musk said in Chris Paine’s documentary Revenge of the Electric Car, “Then I had to make a choice. Either I took all the capital I had left over from the PayPal sale and invested it in Tesla, or Tesla would die. “

Musk raised another $ 40 million, which was the majority of his personal fortune at the time. It was a tough move that impressed the other investors with his unconditional commitment. “That incredible Braggadocio, trust, caused people to change their minds and we and everyone else at the table said, ‘Oh my god, we want to be part of it, we want to get as much of this investment as possible,” VC said – Investor and board member Steve Jurvetson, “He saved the company in its darkest hour with an act of heroism that is difficult to describe. There’s nothing like spending your last dollar on a company you believe in.”

This wasn’t the last near-death experience for Tesla. The company had to cross the dreaded Death Valley again when it launched the Model S and a third time when it shipped the Model 3. Has Musk kept his cool? Not really – as he readily admits (and as we all could see from his eccentric Twitter feed), he was stressed to the max. He risked everything, but the profits were enormous – not just for Musk himself, but for anyone who drives a car, dreams of space travel, or likes to breathe clean air.

The final pillar of Muskian wisdom: ignore the critics. Musk made it clear in his interview with Rowlatt that he was personally very upset about the skepticism, saying no, and outright abuse he faced around 2018 when Model 3 went through production hell and anti-Tesla headlines turned into a surefire click were. Builder of media on both sides of the cultural divide.

“The liberal schadenfreude was really amazing,” said Musk. “There were several blog sites running a Tesla death guard.” As Musk sees it, he and all of the workers in his companies aspired to do great things, and it was hurtful to see how many people worked to make them fail.

Musk didn’t come emotionally safe through the flood of FUD, but he got through. He and his team were utterly vindicated, and the Croakers have lost any trace of credibility (and billions of dollars in some cases).

You could call it a happy ending, except that there is no ending. Tesla has set another round and one more round with unlikely ambitious goals, and SpaceX’s ambition to establish a colony on Mars has yet to be achieved. And Musk doesn’t take great risks. In December, a test of the SpaceX spacecraft launcher ended six minutes after take-off with a “rapid unplanned dismantling” (RUD).

Was the Iron Man discouraged? On the contrary, it focused on the valuable data the test generated. He tweeted: “The pressure in the tank of the fuel was low during landing, resulting in a high touchdown speed and high RUD, but we have all the data we needed! Congratulations SpaceX Team Hell yeah !! ”

He later joked about the event, saying, “Getting the crater in place was epic.” His last word on the subject: “Mars, here we come!”


Written by: Charles Morris;; Source: BBC

Finest animated movies of all time, in keeping with critics | Leisure

Animated films have long outgrown their children’s clothing. As any true movie lover can attest, animated films today rub the best live action films of all time. What used to be relegated mainly to the family genre is a whole spectrum of animated styles, themes and motifs. They join an already legendary list of classic works from production houses like Studio Ghibli and Pixar.

Whether you’re dealing with mature topics, including everything from genocide and criminal justice, or whether you’re targeting the family genre entirely, the best animated films deliver far more quality than one might expect. Even movies that have been marketed as family-friendly are still able to dig deep to provide children with existential instruction wrapped in subtlety while providing entertainment, humor, charm, and depth for adults. And then there are animated films that have been classics for decades and are just plain delightful just for the sake of joy.

What they all have in common is that they sit alongside a slew of live-action masterpieces in terms of durability and timelessness. In 2001, the best animated feature was added to the Academy Awards. This is also proven by the critical reviews, which can almost bubble up if the film is well executed.

But which animated films are critics calling the best of all time (as of January 2021)? Forklift analyzed data from Metacritical for the answer. To qualify for the upcoming list of 100 (worst to first), each film required at least four professional reviews. In the event of a tie, the film was ranked higher on the list with more reviews. Live-action films with occasional animated sequences were not included.

Did your favorite animation film make the cut? Read on to find out what the reviewers had to say.

You may also like … Mistakes from the 50 best movies of all time