Man arrested after carrying AK-style rifle into gasoline station, police say | Crime and Courts



Marlon L. Phillips


Provided

CROWN POINT – A man was arrested last week after several police officers in Gary saw him carry an assault rifle into a gas station, court records show.

Marlon L. Phillips, 27, of Gary, appeared to be hiding the gun in the Citgo gas station at 3118 W. 15th Avenue around 8:30 p.m. on July 1 in the Lake Criminal Court.

Police arrested Phillips at gunpoint as he walked out of the gas station and recognized him immediately from previous contacts, according to the records.

Phillips was convicted of robbery and bodily harm in 2015 and, according to court documents, is suspected of being linked to a gang.

Join Tristan DeFord, Jami Rieck and Nancy Zakutanksky on a shift working for Superior Ambulance in Merrillville.

Police entered the gas station and found an AK-style semi-automatic rifle loaded with 21 rounds of ammunition hidden behind a candy stand.

According to records, officers also found an AR pistol loaded with 30 rounds of ammunition near the rifle.

A man at the gas station told police he had the AR-style pistol but not the AK-style rifle, records say.

Phillips denied that the rifle was documented to be his.

Phillips was released from the Lake County Jail on Wednesday after depositing a $ 3,500 cash loan, records show.

Supreme Courtroom’s Fb Resolution Impacts TCPA Litigation – Media, Telecoms, IT, Leisure

United States:

The Facebook Supreme Court ruling affects TCPA litigation

April 05, 2021

Holland & Knight

To print this article, all you need to do is be registered or log in to Mondaq.com.

The US Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) only covers random calls and text messages to cell phones from an automatic telephone dialing system (ATDS).

The decision in Facebook, Inc. v Duguid et al.The April 1, 2021 ruling overturned a U.S. appeals court ruling for the ninth circuit where the appeals court broadly defined the type of automatic telephone dialing system covered by the TCPA. The Supreme Court’s narrow interpretation of the autodialer definition and its applicability to new technologies is a significant asset to the defense. The decision is expected to significantly reduce the number of class action lawsuits under this law.

The Supreme Court agreed with Facebook’s interpretation that an autodialer under the law does not apply to technology used by Facebook and other companies that use similar technologies. The opinion of Justice Sonia Sotomayor states that “[a]
necessary function of an autodialer under [the TCPA] is the ability to use a random or sequence number generator to store or produce phone numbers to be called. “Facebook argued that the company was sending targeted texts to phone numbers already in its database, so the TCPA did not apply.

The aversion to robocalls and texts is a rare bipartisan topic. The decision can open the door for Congress to pass laws that update the 1992 law to cover new technologies or pass laws that apply to technologies used by companies like Facebook. Some states also have TCPA-like laws that set their own restrictions on automated dialing and text messaging. It is therefore important for businesses to assess the state-level restrictions before making changes based on the Supreme Court decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide general guidance on the subject. A professional should be consulted about your particular circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: USA Media, Telecommunications, IT, Entertainment

Is it banned by the FDA or is it Protected Language?

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz

As part of the ongoing monitoring of health claims related to COVID-19, the FDA has issued a warning letter to Dr. Joseph Mercola and Mercola.com, LLC informing them that they are in breach of federal law.

TCPA Tracker – February 2021

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

On December 30, 2020, the FCC released a report and regulation providing guidance on the TCPA exemption requirements.

TCPA Tracker – March 2021

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

On March 9, 2021, Inovalon, Inc. filed a letter requesting the FCC to respond to Inovalon’s declaratory judgment request, confirming that “faxes without a direct commercial purpose …

Man sentenced to four years for capturing 2 with assault-style rifle at Schererville park | Crime and Courts

Ransom had three crime convictions and was on parole at the time of the Schererville shooting for illegally carrying a gun in Illinois, Villarreal said.

Picking up a fight he was not involved in, he brought a gun and caused life-threatening injuries to two people, she said.

A teenager enlisted Ransom’s help after agreeing to fight a 19-year-old man. Ransom’s 19-year-old and teenage girlfriend wanted to date the same woman who, according to court records, wasn’t interested in either.

Witnesses described the gun that Ransom used to shoot the 19-year-old and his 19-year-old friend as an “Uzi-esque” rifle, Villarreal said. Five other people at the scene were not injured.

The gun was never recovered and Ransom refused to provide a statement to police after he was arrested, she said.

“He didn’t even know these people,” said Villarreal. “He just had a total disregard for her life.”

Villarreal read a victim impact statement from the 19-year-old who had an argument with Ransom’s boyfriend about the woman.

He wrote that he almost lost his leg after a bullet ripped through one of his legs into the other.

When the man was “hanging by a thread” with his leg, he looked over and saw that his friend was being loaded into an ambulance. The friend now has a bullet next to his spine, Villarreal said.

Choose: Ogden legal professional violated ethics guidelines by withholding, spending shopper’s cash | Courts

OGDEN – A judge found Monday that an Ogden attorney violated the rules of professional ethics by pocketing and pretending to be a client’s dispute settlement and lying about it after he was caught.

At the end of a two-and-a-half-day trial in the Second District Court, Judge Noel Hyde ruled that Richard H. Reeve had been guilty of dishonesty, failed to seize three clients’ funds, and wrongly granted a paralegal curtailment of a settlement.

Hyde also objected to statements made by Reeve during the trial, saying there was “no evidence” to support some of Reeve’s allegations, “even under oath on his testimony during that trial.”

The judge said Reeve “stopped short of deliberate perjury, but there were certainly shades and artful answers to questions.”

Hyde hosted a status conference on February 25 that gave Reeve and Barbara Townsend, an attorney for the Office of Professional Conduct at the Utah State Bar, time to prepare for the trial.

Possible penalties range from a warning to a ban.

The OPC filed the case in 2017, accusing Reeve of processing a $ 380,000 severance payment awarded to Jean Tonioli in a 2015 death against a drug company. The Roy wife’s husband, Bob, died in New York City when the couple returned from a Baltic vacation in 2011.

The previous Monday, Townsend interviewed Reeve about two withdrawals he made in August and September 2015 from the personal credit union account where he had deposited Tonioli’s stake of approximately $ 254,000 in February.

Reeve testified that he withdrew $ 22,110 on Aug. 1 to pay a car dealer for a vehicle and on Sept. 9, he withdrew $ 16,000 to pay a woman who later became a wife.

Townsend said those withdrawals came “after he testified there was trouble” when he was able to pay Tonioli because by then much of her money had been spent.

Last week, Reeve blamed his ex-wife for at least two large withdrawals earlier this year that he said still had access to the account during the divorce.

In her concluding argument, Townsend said, even if his ex-wife spent part of Tonioli’s money, “He’s the attorney in charge of the settlement money. It doesn’t matter what (the first wife) did.”

“Over the course of seven months, he spent not only $ 99,000 on what was his (part of the settlement) but also $ 167,000 of Tonioli’s money,” Townsend said.

Last week Townsend detailed other expenses, such as trips to Las Vegas, San Antonio and Jackson Hole, Wyoming, and purchases from wedding chapels and rings.

Reeve, who represented himself in the ethics process, admitted in his final argument that he had endangered his integrity, put his legal partners in a difficult position and violated Tonioli’s trust.

“I deeply regret the behavior I demonstrated,” he said, adding that he “tried to take immediate steps to correct the problems.”

Townsend argued that the evidence is overwhelming that Reeve is violating the rule of ethics that prevents a lawyer from engaging in “dishonesty, fraud, deception or misconduct”.

According to testimony, Reeve ordered his trainee attorney to have the billing check forwarded to him, not the usual procedure on the law firm’s escrow account.

That was in February 2015. The paralegal eventually went to executives at a law firm in Ogden, where she and Reeve were working on his failure to pay Tonioli and his client’s stone wall when she asked for the money.

Reeve was confronted with this in September 2015, saying the money was in an escrow account and Tonioli knew about it. After the company investigated, Reeve changed its story, saying the settlement was still pending in federal court, which was also wrong.

The company fired Reeve on September 16, and he met with Tonioli and her son the next day to pay for the money they had come.

But as evidence, the OPC produced a document Reeve had prepared for that meeting, which Townsend said covered up the truth about what had happened to the money.

“He made up this document to show for the Toniolis’ that it was all in there all along,” said Townsend. “Don’t be fooled by what Mr. Reeve said.”

Hyde ruled that several of the arguments Reeve made in his defense were “not credible”, including his description of that September 17 document.

The document, a screenshot of what was presented as a credit union banking record, “is in and of itself a misrepresentation and Mr. Reeve knew it at the time he was preparing it,” said Hyde.

Hyde said he found it “very worrying” that Reeve would “go to considerable effort in attempting to create the appearance of a justification for this document” by this process.

Last week Reeve testified that he had sold part of his stake in a limited liability company to his brother so that he could raise enough money to pay Tonioli what she owed.

But Hyde said Reeves’ details on these moves “weighs on credibility” because there is no record of such a transaction and no evidence of the source of the $ 167,000 Reeve deposited to offset what he spent.

The judge found that Reeve had broken rules not to trust the custody of client funds in the Tonioli matter and two other cases where Reeve had directed the trainee attorney to send settlements to him.

Hyde also confirmed allegations that Reeve violated restrictions on attorney independence by seeing the trainee attorney received approximately $ 3,000 from his share of court profits.