Britney Spears’ father petitions to finish conservatorship that controls her life, cash

LOS ANGELES – Britney Spears’ father filed on Tuesday to quit the judicial conservatory that has controlled the singer’s life and money for 13 years.

James Spears filed his motion to terminate the conservatoires in the Los Angeles Superior Court.

“As Mr. Spears has repeatedly said, he only wants what is best for his daughter,” the document reads. “If Mrs. Spears wants to quit the conservatory and thinks she can manage her own life, Mr. Spears believes she should get this chance.”

Judge Brenda Penny, who oversees the case, must approve the move.

There was no instant response to an email soliciting Britney Spears’ attorney for comment.

James Spears has been the target of much of the anger for the Conservatory of both his daughter and the public.

A motion from Britney Spears’ attorney to have him removed should be heard at the next hearing on the case on September 29th.

James Spears said in a filing on Aug. 12 that he was planning to step down as curator of their finances, but did not offer a schedule. He gave up his control over their life choices in 2019 and only kept his role of overseeing their money.

He has repeatedly said that there is no justification for his removal and that he was only acting in the best interests of his daughter.

The Conservatory was founded in 2008 when Britney Spears began to have very public mental battles, when the media became obsessed with every moment, hordes of paparazzi aggressively followed her everywhere, and she lost custody of her children.

Tuesday’s file cited how Britney Spears’ “passionate plea” rejected the legal agreement in a speech in court on Jan.

“I just want my life back,” said Britney Spears. “And it’s been 13 years and it’s enough. It’s been a long time since I owned my money. And it is my wish and my dream that it all end unchecked.”

Tuesday’s filing notes that Spears said she didn’t know she could petition to end the Conservatory, which she has yet to do. Penny’s decision to hire her own attorney, Mathew Rosengart, shows that the court is entrusting her with important decisions. And it is said that evidence shows she appeared to have “demonstrated a level of independence” by, for example, driving around Southern California herself.

It also cites her desire to make her own decisions about therapy and other medical care.

Spears had said in her June 23 speech that under the Conservatory she was forced to take certain drugs against her will and use an intrauterine device to control births.

James Spears called for an investigation into these and other allegations, saying they were issues beyond his control as he resigned as curator of his daughter’s person and turned the role over to court-appointed professional Jodi Montgomery.

Rosengart, Britney Spears’ new attorney, said when he was hired in July that he wanted to help end the conservatories.

He said instead that his first priority was getting rid of James Spears, whom he asked to step down on his first court appearance.

Rosengart requested the removal of James Spears on July 26 on the grounds that he had mismanaged his daughter’s money and affairs, suggesting that he had used the conservatories for his own benefit. The judge denied him an emergency hearing on the matter and said it could be heard in September in due course.

The attorney said he welcomed James Spears’ announcement that he would eventually step down, but said it would not slow his efforts to get him removed.

Spears has commended the Conservatory’s early existence for keeping her career afloat, although she has now completely put her work on hold for more than two years.

Fans who objected to their circumstances and saw what they thought were calls for help on the pop star’s Instagram posts called #FreeBritney online and appeared before their court hearings to protest.

Famous names from Miley Cyrus to Britney Spears ‘ex Justin Timberlake have joined the outcry in recent months, especially after Spears’ passionate courtroom speeches in June and July.

Penny, the judge with ultimate power over the Conservatory, never seems inclined to end it, but neither has she ever had such a clear opportunity.

Cash & the Regulation: Colorado has had its share of conservatorship dramas | Enterprise

With the Britney Spears melodrama for inspiration, I thought I’d tell you a few things about conservatories.

Establishing a conservatory begins with filing an application with a probate court asking the court to put someone – a so-called “restorer” – in charge of the financial affairs of the person whose abilities allegedly fail, which are considered “protected.” Person ”. Before the motion can be upheld, the court (in Colorado at least) must be presented with clear and convincing evidence that the protected person “is unable to manage property and business because the person is unable to obtain information effectively maintain or evaluate or both or make decisions or communicate. … “

The protected person must be informed about the procedure and is entitled to a lawyer. The court may also appoint a person known as a “visitor” to conduct an investigation aimed at providing the court with an objective analysis of the need for a restorer.

The conservator, when appointed, assumes the position of trustee, which means that the protected person is owed the duty of the greatest loyalty and honesty. The court issues the conservator with an official (and official-looking) document that can be used by the conservator to take over the protected person’s assets and liabilities. The court may adapt the curator’s powers to the particular circumstances of the case.

Once a conservator has been appointed, the protected person is deprived of the power to conduct his or her own financial affairs. The law also protects against liability people who deal with the protected person in good faith and without knowledge of the existence of a restoration. So a protected person can still wreak havoc if not carefully watched.

The motivation for a conservatory sometimes comes from children who fear that a parent in decline will squander family wealth before it can be passed on as inheritance. This is not a fair reason for a restoration. Rather, the purpose should be to preserve assets in the “best interests” of the protected person. Preservation of wealth in the interests of the protected person can (incidentally) also have the effect of preserving wealth for an inheritance if the protected person dies.

Colorado has its share of conservatory melodramas. In a recent case, a man named Bernard Black – a full law professor at Northwestern University School of Law – was found to have violated a duty of loyalty to his sister, the protected person, as a conservator. This break involved a diversion of assets from a trust set up by the late mother to meet her daughter’s needs to a trust in which her son, the conservator’s children, had an interest. This dispute over control of the late mother’s property found its way in eight courts in three states (meaning much of the mother’s property has now been consumed by the legal profession).

In another case that went before the Colorado Court of Appeals, Matthew Keenan, a protected individual, attempted to dismiss a bank that was acting as its curator. The bank struggled, and the dispute merged into a dispute for $ 200,000 plus legal fees and costs claimed by the bank.

Jim Flynn can be reached at moneylaw@jtflynn.com.

Amber Tamblyn praises Britney Spears for giving ‘damning document’ of conservatorship | Leisure

Amber Tamblyn has commended Britney Spears for making a “damned public record” of her conservatories.

The ‘Toxic’ hitmaker went to court this week to brand the Conservatory, which has put her father Jamie Spears in control of its affairs since 2008, as “abusive” in trying to get a judge to rule the situation break up.

And now, 38-year-old Amber – who also rose to fame as a teenager and had her career overseen by her parents – has defended Britney as she pointed out the “parallels” between their lives.

In an essay for the New York Times, she wrote, “After seeing some of the complications and consequences of finding fame and financial success at a young age, I can confirm how difficult this combination of factors can be, in fact to navigate for those with the best of intentions. I also know how much potential they have to become toxic and how vulnerable they can make a young woman. “

Amber further admitted that while Britney, 39, is not “the only woman in public” whose life has been “privately controlled”, she is one of the first to publicly condemn the actions of what will happen to others in the future.

She added, “Britney Spears is not the only woman in public who has long been privately controlled, but she may be one of the first women in a very long time to make such a devastating public record of it. When I see her testimony now, I can’t help but think of that bald-headed Britney in 2007, raw with anger and tired of being everyone’s spectacle. Even now, I sense that the world wants to turn their latest statement into yet another episode of voyeurism – to defend it once again as our favorite mess. “

The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants star said she hoped Britney’s court testimony would remind people that “our physical and fiscal autonomy is worth fighting for”.

She explained, “But as someone with a taste of what Britney went through, I know what she did is a profoundly radical act – one that I hope will make its way through their bodies and bank accounts of women in all industries will spread to coming generations. In her words, she reminded us that it is worth fighting for our physical and fiscal autonomy.

“We cannot know its truth now – as it was said in its own voice, not a voice written, curated or projected onto it for it. Now it’s really up to us to listen. “

Britney Spears ‘will not attend conservatorship listening to in courtroom’ | Leisure

Britney Spears will not attend her Conservatory hearing in person.

The 39-year-old pop star will appear virtually at the June 23 hearing after her attorney previously urged the court to “speed up” Britney in the ongoing battle for her conservatory, according to Us Weekly.

Britney has been unable to make important financial decisions for herself without her father’s approval since her 2008 conservatory contract.

The subject came into the spotlight this year after the February documentary “Framing Britney Spears” which explored the conservatoire battle.

And in March, the “… Baby One More Time” hit maker, who rose to global fame as a teenager, hit social media to talk about the documentary and the speculation that came with it.

She wrote on Instagram: “My life has always been very speculated … observed … and really my whole life was judged !!! For my sanity I have to dance to @iamstevent every night of my life to feel wild and human and alive has been exposed all my life performing in front of people !!!

She later added, “As the world goes on and life goes on, we as humans still remain so fragile and sensitive !! (sic) “

Britney subsequently stated that even though she hadn’t seen the documentary, she felt “embarrassed”.

The pop star said, “I haven’t seen the documentary, but from what I’ve seen I was embarrassed by the light they put me in … I’ve cried for two weeks and well … I still cry sometimes.

“I do what I can with myself in my own spirituality to try to keep my own joy … love … and happiness !!!! Dancing every day brings me joy !!! I am not here to be perfect … perfect is boring … I’m here to pass on friendliness !!!! (sic) “

Britney Spears set to talk in courtroom on her conservatorship | Leisure

LOS ANGELES (AP) – Britney Spears has asked to go to the court to discuss the conservatory which has controlled her life and finances for 13 years, her lawyer said Tuesday, and a judge has an appointment in the Scheduled June to hear from her.

Court-appointed Spears attorney Samuel Ingham III said in a hearing in the Los Angeles Supreme Court that she had asked to speak to the court soon and agreed to an appointment with Judge Brenda Penny on June 23. He didn’t say what she specifically wanted to say.

It would be the first known time in more than two years that the 39-year-old pop star has spoken in court. The last time, on May 10, 2019, the courtroom was sealed. Nothing she said went public.

The judge can also close the hearing in June for the media and the public. But Spears, through Ingham, pushed for more transparency in the Conservatory’s legal proceedings and documents.

Spears did not attend Tuesday’s hearing, and she attends very rarely.

As with almost every Spears hearing, around 50 fans of the so-called #FreeBritney movement picketed the courthouse downtown.

On Tuesday they carried signs that read “CONSERVATION IS slavery” and “THIS IS TOXIC”.

A woman wearing a #FreeBritney t-shirt shaved her head during the demonstration in solidarity with Spears, who shaved her own head just before the Conservatory opened in 2008.