Reps. Kim, Meijer Introduce Invoice to Create An Impartial, 9/11-Fashion Afghanistan Warfare Fee

Reps. Kim and Meijer introduce bill to create an independent September 11, 2001-style Afghanistan War Commission

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Congressman Andy Kim (NJ-03) and Congressman Peter Meijer (MI-03) introduced the Afghanistan War Commission Act of 2021 to create a non-partisan, independent commission to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the war in Afghanistan. The commission would need to produce a public and unclassified report with actionable recommendations so that the United States can learn from our experience in Afghanistan and be prepared for future conflicts.

“The war in Afghanistan was a state effort that – now complete – requires an independent, state-wide assessment to see what happened. This commission is vital to the future security of our country. ” said Congressman Kim. “I am proud to introduce this bipartisan law that will create an independent commission because the national security of our country should not be partisan. I am grateful for Congressman Meijer’s guidance on this matter and hope that this will be turned into law so that our country can have a full, in-depth look at the war in Afghanistan. “

The Afghanistan War Commission Act would require the commission to investigate all aspects of the war, including combat operations, intelligence operations, diplomatic activities and inter-agency coordination. The commission’s investigation would include all relevant US government agencies, including the Department of Defense, the Department of State and the intelligence community, as well as the efforts of our NATO allies.

Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) presented the accompanying draft in the Senate, which has received bipartisan support. Senator Duckworth and Senator Todd Young (R-IN) also introduced the bill as a bipartisan amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2022, which is currently under Senate scrutiny.

“The war in Afghanistan was shaped by four different governments and 11 different congresses – no party should try to get cheap, party-political points from a decades-long failure of nation-building that arose across parties.” said Senator Duckworth. “Congress owes a serious, honest, long-term effort to accountability and transparency to the thousands of American soldiers who have made sacrifices in Afghanistan. I am delighted that MPs Kim and Meijer are taking the lead on my proposal in the House of Representatives so that we can set up an independent, non-partisan commission to ensure that we get out of the mistakes we have made in Afghanistan for more than 20 years , learn and reform to ensure these mistakes never happen repeatedly. “

“During my years of work on site in Afghanistan, I have seen successes and failures in the fight against terrorism. To learn from both our mistakes and our successes in this conflict, it is critical that we take a full view of all combat operations and strategic decisions from the 9/11 attacks to the disastrous withdrawal of the Biden administration. Our bill to set up a bipartisan, independent commission will ensure that the lessons of this 20-year war are absorbed and implemented in the future. ” said Congressman Meijer.

“The American people deserve an honest examination of the decision-making that led to 20 years of failed foreign policy in Afghanistan. It is of the utmost importance that we not ignore the teachings that led to our nation’s longest war – one that spanned four governments, both parties and numerous conventions. We commend Rep. Kim and Rep. Meijer, both of whom have seen firsthand the failure of US policy in Afghanistan, for their leadership and call on their colleagues in the House to support these common sense efforts. ” said Russ Duerstine, associate director of Concerned Veterans for America.

The bill is approved by Affected Veterans For America, VoteVets, and the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America.

You can find the full text of the law here, and a one-page summary can be found here.

Prior to his service in the House of Representatives, Congressman Kim served in Afghanistan as civil adviser to the four-star US Strategic Commander at the height of the war in Afghanistan. He also served with USAID, the Pentagon, the State Department, and the White House National Security Council.

Congressman Kim serves on the House Armed Services Committee, House Foreign Affairs Committee, and House Committee on Small Business. For more information on Congressman Kim, visit his website at click here.

(Visited 6 times, visited 6 times today)

Dallas Morning Information: A 9/11-style fee is required to look at the Afghanistan withdrawal

The lesson of the president’s power is not drawn from how it is wielded in the best of times, but from how it manifests itself in crisis. Mistakes arise in a crisis and hopefully mistakes become knowledge to improve future decisions.

A long list of the president’s foreign policy misjudgments has defined the government’s legacy, reshaping leadership for an incumbent president and sometimes for future inmates of the Oval Office.

In 1961, John F. Kennedy launched the Bay of Pigs Invasion of Cuba, a covert operation to overthrow Fidel Castro. From the start, an unsound strategy, pathetic tactics, and an abundance of intelligence errors failed. Out of this crisis, JFK accepted the guilt and reorganized its advisors and decision-making processes. When faced with the Cuban Missile Crisis a year later, Kennedy asked the right questions and led the nation on the other side of a nuclear threat that could have killed 80 million Americans in a matter of moments.

President Joe Biden has already announced that he will not call for resignation for the deaths of 13 soldiers and countless Afghans by a suicide bomber in the last days of the Airlift. This week, Biden described the evacuation as an “extraordinary success”, although Americans and Afghans who wanted to leave the country stayed when the last plane departed without them.

Nonetheless, questions must be answered, both internally and externally, about the decisions and tactics that lead to and through the United States’ last moment in Afghanistan. Historians and experts will debate whether the die of inevitability was cast years ago, but leaving Kabul is undeniable, while historical and massive, heroic and tragic also represented a failure of the imagination.

We have heard this criticism before in the history of the President. Yale psychologist Irving Janis called the Bay of Pigs’ decision-making mistakes “groupthink,” which describes the pursuit of consensus in a way that prevents alternatives from being properly considered. According to a Harvard Business Review case study, historian Arthur Schlesinger later wrote that “our meetings were held in a strange atmosphere of supposed consensus. [and] nobody spoke against it. “

The nation has to go down the path of difficult issues regarding Afghanistan. The follow-up investigation by the 9/11 Commission, an independent, bipartisan body, identified missed signs, unresolved conflicting intelligence and information silos that were gathering vital information but unable or unwilling to link to threat advisories in other parts of government. The Commission’s overall conclusion was that coordination and information sharing could have provided a clearer and potentially workable warning of the impending terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.

Right now, we urge Congress to empower an independent, bipartisan commission to review the final stages of the end of the American presence in Afghanistan – from the Trump administration’s ill-considered unilateral peace deal with the Taliban to the chaotic evacuation of the Biden. Administration.

This commission must have credible leadership, similar to what Republican Tom Kean, a former governor, and Democrat Lee Hamilton, a former US Congressman, gave the nation after the 9/11 attacks.

The commission, established by Congress and signed by President George W. Bush, had the authority to summon witnesses and the credibility to maneuver the minefields of executive privilege and segregation of power. Above all, however, it was not an effort to assign blame, but to find out why, in retrospect, such obvious indications that could have prevented the deadly attacks on US soil escaped analysis.

There are many Americans who can jointly conduct a fair investigation, such as former US Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, a Republican from Texas, and former US Senator Bob Kerrey, a Democrat from Nebraska, also on the 9/11 commission.

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell, former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, former CIA director and retired Army General David Petraeus, former Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels, former US MP Jane Harman and Leon Panetta who served as White House Chief of Staff, The CIA director and secretary of defense would also be good choices. These individuals and other men and women of goodwill would bring insights from their administration during the Bush and Obama years, but they were either outside the administration or not part of the inner circles of the Trump and Biden administrations when politics was on clearest was shifted towards retreat.

We cannot stress enough that this commission must look beyond partisanship and be an honest broker. The commission cannot be a replica of the GOP partisan attack on the September 11, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi that killed four brave Americans – Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. Nor should the Democrats oppose an investigation into any administration of their party, as the Republicans did when they overwhelmingly voted against an independent commission and a select congressional committee to review the January 6 insurrection.

There are many lessons to be learned from 20 years of war in Afghanistan, including missed opportunities, a shifting mission, the lack of a stable central government, and interference from regional neighbors like Pakistan. But the past two years, including the first eight months of the Biden administration when the withdrawal became a reality, deserve additional scrutiny and insight that only a substantial commission and fair approach can provide.

The war in Afghanistan and how that war ended will reverberate in American political circles for at least a generation. The light footprint that marked the beginning of the war was likely the result of a reluctance to deploy American troops, a reluctance that had persisted since the Vietnam era. It is therefore vital that a commission document all the facts and the context in which decisions were made. This will give us valuable insights and material lessons from this chapter of our history.

Wooden County Fee to carry public listening to on stimulus cash

PARKERSBURG, W.Va. (WTAP) – Later this month, Wood County residents will have the opportunity to share their views on how the district commission is supposed to spend money under the American Recovery Act.

The district commission announced last week that a public hearing would be held on Monday, August 23 at 5:30 p.m. in Judge Donald F. Black’s annex in downtown Parkersburg.

Wood County received $ 16 million from the American Recovery Act, which was approved by Congress in February.

Federal law requires the money to be used for projects related to the pandemic. But the district commission wants to hear the concerns of the citizens.

“I think every project will be worth listening to,” said Commission President Blair Couch. “Every idea is worthy. Some projects may not fit into the American Recovery program, and some projects will if we have additional funding outside of those funds. But if it’s a great idea, it’s a great idea. “

The municipalities have until the end of 2024 to spend the money.

Wood County has already made plans for a multi-purpose community building on the site of the now demolished county jail, a multi-purpose community building, and a relocation of the district’s 911 center.

She seeks legal advice for other projects and holds interviews with candidates for a financial advisor.

Copyright 2021 WTAP. All rights reserved.

Kevin McCarthy rejects bipartisan plan for 9/11-style Capitol assault fee | US Capitol breach

House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy said Tuesday he was opposed to a proposal to set up an independent and non-partisan commission to investigate the deadly January 6 attack on the Capitol.

McCarthy’s opposition will undermine Republican support before it is voted on this week. Democrats control the house, but McCarthy’s opposition could reduce the legislature’s chances of setting up the commission in the evenly divided Senate.

In one statementMcCarthy accused House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of maliciously negotiating and “playing political games”.

He said: “Given the political misdirections that have undermined this process, given the now dual and potentially counterproductive nature of these efforts, and given the short-sighted scope of the speaker who did not examine the interrelated forms of political violence in America, I cannot read this legislation support. ”

McCarthy has long said the commission should look beyond the Capitol uprising and investigate left-wing groups protesting police violence following the murder of George Floyd.

Pelosi flatly rejected this approach and tried to model the body on the model of the non-partisan and independent 9/11 commission, which investigated and produced a report on the terrorist attacks in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.

Bennie Thompson from Mississippi and John Katko from New York, the top Democrat and Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, made a compromise proposal last week.

The commission would be split evenly between Democratic and Republican candidates, neither of whom serve government officials, and both factions would have to agree that subpoenas be issued.

Donald Trump supporters broke the Capitol in service of his lie that the election was subject to mass fraud and in an attempt to stop the confirmation of Joe Biden’s victory. Some rioters were looking for lawmakers, including then Vice President Mike Pence, to catch and possibly kill them. More than 400 were billed.

McCarthy said He supported federal efforts to hold attackers accountable, but claimed the proposed commission could disrupt such work.

Liz Cheney, the Wyoming representative who has been expelled from the leadership of the House of Republicans for opposition to Trump and tries to downplay the Capitol uprising. led calls for McCarthy, willingly or forced to testify regarding his conversation with Trump during the attack.

Washington state Republican Jaime Herrera Beutler said McCarthy told her when he asked the president to retrieve his supporters, Trump replied, “Well, Kevin, I think these people are more upset than the elections You.”

In a recent interview on Fox News, McCarthy Avoided questions about Beutler’s statement – but did not deny it.

Cheney told ABC last week, “I would hope he doesn’t need a subpoena, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he got a subpoena.”

But McCarthy has thrown his support behind Trump, whose rule over the Republican Party is almost complete despite his two impeachments – the second for inciting the Capitol uprising – and his final electoral defeat.

Capitol Police said this month that threats against members of Congress increased 107% year over year.

With extra ‘hope cash’ from feds on the horizon, South Dakota’s transportation fee OKs changing 31 bridges

“We know we have a number of bridges in disrepair,” said Tammy Williams, SDDOT program manager, during a meeting of the South Dakota Transportation Commission Thursday, April 29th. But Williams told the commission that federal grants could be in excess of $ 30 million annually for the next four years.

When asked how reliable this funding could be, she replied, “However, we are programming for it … and we just hope.”

“Hope money,” interjected Commissioner Mike Vehleto laugh at.

The bridges of the state of South Dakota are more sobering, however.

A national trade group released a report Earlier this year, South Dakota was found to have the fourth worst rating of structurally weak bridges in the country.

And while the congress is debating duel infrastructure approaches – President Biden announces he plans to spend more than $ 2 trillion while Republicans of the Senate have proposed a reduced $ 500 billion plan – South Dakotans, who depend on federal dollars for bridge funding, listen.

State officials said that on Thursday deteriorated conditions are not largely found in the inventory of around 1,800 directly owned by the state.

“Our government structures are in pretty good shape,” SDDOT’s chief bridge engineer Steve Johnson told the commission.

However, conditions are becoming more precarious for the 3,900 buildings in counties or cities where the average bridge age (51 years) is seven years older than the national average (44). On Thursday, Williams said that 25% of that inventory is classified as “in poor condition” by the state.

“The county system came a little earlier,” Williams said, noting that roads and associated bridges were built from the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s, decades before the highway system on which many state structures rest. “Many of the local structures date from this time.”

But she said they are “making progress”.

Last year, a federal-local program funded the repair of 49 structures. On Thursday, the commission unanimously approved the approval of $ 21.5 million 31 Replacing structures – and remove another 11 – currently in the public inventory of the bridges and place them in the coming year Planning budget.

“It’s good business,” Williams commented.

The bridges, she said, were selected by a scoring system that awarded applicants points based on the condition of the bridge and its “impact on the user”. The bridges awarded include a number that crosses the various waterways, which state officials in certain areas of South Dakota have identified as a constant challenge.

“If you look at the east side of the state, you can actually see the major rivers that flow through South Dakota and the tributaries that flow into them,” noted Mike Behm, director of the planning and engineering division who provided the commission on Thursday with a structure condition report summarizing the conditions of the 5,700 public bridges in South Dakota that cover 82,000 miles of carriageway.

Of the 31 bridges to be replaced, four cross Wolf Creek in rural Hand County, while others include structures that span the Big Sioux and Miller Creek in Spearfish.

Paducah Metropolis Fee takes first step in establishing an Leisure Vacation spot Middle | Information

PADUCAH – Paducah City Commission took the first step towards creating an entertainment destination center on Tuesday evening by holding the first reading of the proposed regulation to make it happen. If the ordinance is passed, the 50-acre area along the Paducah riverside should allow people to buy take-away cups of alcohol at local bars and restaurants and walk around with open containers.



EDC card

The proposed limits of Paducah’s Entertainment Destination Center.

The aim is to send the application to the state by the end of the month following the second reading and approval of the regulation. The city would have to get a state-issued license every year to have an EDC. The city is working to have the EDC set up by Memorial Day.

Minor changes have been made to the boundaries to allow people to safely walk the sidewalks when they have the appropriate take away cups. Kathryn Byers, the city’s business development specialist, says the mugs have seen some design changes as well.



new cup designs

The new cup designs feature a QR code that users can scan with their phones to see which companies are participating in the EDC and what the limits are.

“There will now be a downside to this mug that has a QR code that you can scan on your phone. A map will appear showing you where to go within the border. It will also list the bars and attendees Restaurants so you know where to go and where to go, “Byers said.

The city plans to set up an EDC to help companies recover financially from the pandemic. The hours when alcohol should be served have also changed.

“We suggested that this be from 6 a.m. to 3 a.m. the next morning,” Byers said. “We’re going to put that back until midnight, so it’ll be 6:00 a.m. to midnight.”

Commissioner Sandra Wilson agrees that changing these hours is the right move. Wilson believes it will be better for people who live, or are interested in living in, downtown.

“I think as we’re promoting more upstairs living downtown in this area, there just has to be this cut-off time when people might be a little quieter,” said Wilson.

The license would cost the city $ 2,500 each year. You want to share the cost with the bars and restaurants interested in participating in the EDC. Around 20 companies in the proposed area of ​​the EDC would be eligible to sell take-away alcoholic beverages. The special beakers purchased within the confines of the EDC are for single use and cannot be removed from the range.

Capitol riots: Pelosi says she could be open to abandoning 9/11-style fee if efforts stay stalled

“It’s always an option,” said Pelosi USA today published in an interview on Tuesday. “It’s in no way my preference. My preference would be to have a commission.”

A commission of this kind would have to be set up by statute, which is approved by both chambers and legally signed by the President. The commissioners would not be elected leaders, but would come from outside the government.

The 9/11 panel was chaired by a former Republican governor with a former Democratic congressman as vice chairman. Its members included other former lawmakers and government officials from both parties.

A Plan designed by Democrats The commissioners are due to submit their report by the end of the year. The commission would then end 60 days after the report was published.

But both Republicans and Democrats involved in the negotiations say talks on the issue have stalled with little communication between the two sides. Although Pelosi has not agreed to a 50:50 partisan split in the commission, she argues that the real problem is that the GOP is unwilling to focus the probe specifically on what led to the uprising. Republican leaders have argued that political violence in general should be a subject of investigation.

Pelosi told the newspaper that it will soon enact laws to strengthen security measures in the Capitol, as no action has been taken since then retired Lieutenant General Russel Honoré, who led a security review at the Capitol after the uprising issued his recommendations.

Pelosi said in an interview that the mob that stormed the Capitol in an attack that killed five dead wanted to kill them but felt safe because of the security around them.

“That’s what they wanted,” she told USA Today.

The spokeswoman said she would never forgive the rioters for the trauma the attack caused to lawmakers and employees, who were locked into a lockdown as security officials struggled to regain control of the iconic building when it was momentarily disturbed by the crowd trailer at that time was overtaken. President Donald Trump.

This story has been updated with background information.

CNN’s Annie Grayer, Jeremy Herb and Ryan Nobles contributed to this report.

The Day – 9/11-style fee will look at Capitol riot

WASHINGTON – Spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi said Monday that the house would set up an independent commission to investigate what led to a mob storming the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 – a place similar to where the Sept. 11 attacks were carried out September had investigated 15 months before it was published a comprehensive 585-page report.

Two days after former President Donald Trump was acquitted of instigating the deadly Senate attack, Pelosi signaled in a letter to Democratic colleagues that the House would soon legislate to set up a commission to “investigate and report” on the attack and electoral interference will consider procedures and a budget allocation for enhanced security features on the Capitol grounds.

Retired Army General Russel Honoré, selected by Pelosi, D-Calif., To assess post-attack security, highlighted the need for improved security measures in his “interim reporting,” Pelosi said.

“It appears from his findings and the impeachment process that we need to know the truth about how this happened,” she wrote.

Pelosi’s letter also arrived as congressional committees are planning hearings to interview the heads of the agencies involved in preparing and responding to the attacks.

Proponents of the commission say such an initiative will have broader authority than these committees to obtain testimony from people in Trump’s orbit – voices who were not part of the impeachment investigation. The Commission is not subject to the timing of these committee inquiries as it presents its results.

Both party lawmakers, speaking on news broadcasts on Sunday, advocated the idea of ​​an independent investigation modeled on the National Terrorist Attacks Commission, established by Congress and President George W. Bush in 2002, which published a report with recommendations on how to protect against future attacks.

Senator Lindsey Graham, RS.C., who voted in favor of Trump’s acquittal, said he wanted to know more about the timing of the president’s actions and what congressional leaders knew about the potential threat.

“We need a 9/11 commission to find out what happened and to make sure it never happens again,” he told Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace, despite being the Democrats and the minority leader of the Senate, Mitch McConnell, R-Ky, scourged. on impeachment.

While the House voted in favor of the president’s indictment a week after the violent attack, the Senate cleared Trump 57-43, ten less than two-thirds necessary for a conviction.

Senator Bill Cassidy, R-La., Who along with six other Republicans voted to condemn Trump, said many questions remain unanswered after the difficult process.

“Why weren’t there more law enforcement agencies? The National Guard has already mobilized what was known, who knew and when they knew, all of that because that lays the foundation for this never to happen again in the future,” Cassidy told ABC News “This week”.

Hours after the Senate verdict, the Louisiana Republican Party voted to blame Cassidy.

House impeachment manager Madeleine Dean, D-Pa., Who also spoke on “This Week,” alluded to the partiality of Saturday’s vote and said a commission could avoid political arguments.

“Of course there has to be a full commission, an impartial commission, not run by politics but full of people who would stand up to the courage of their convictions, like Dr Cassidy,” she said.

For Democrats, the commission can help hold the president accountable after the impeachment investigation failed to convict Trump during his Jan. 6 speech to encourage supporters to stop the vote count for President-elect Joe Biden.

“There is more evidence that the American people need and deserve to hear, and a 9/11 commission is one way to ensure that we secure the Capitol for the future and that we keep the records of it How responsible and how pathetic it is for violating President Trump’s constitutional oath really was, “Senator Chris Coons, D-Del., said on” This Week. “