Shevchenko mixes warning and elegance to assist Ukraine make historical past – The Athletic

There they stood with arms raised, thundering in unison with the support their own little piece of Ukraine had seized in Hampden Park. Andriy Shevchenko, Oleksandr Zinchenko and Artem Dovbyk: the god, son and darling of the nation at the head of the lineup.

If the adrenaline had flowed out of their bodies, the corner would have been marshland. Just a few moments earlier, they had secured a place in the first EM quarter-finals. Fans crowded the front row to celebrate, lose themselves, worship, and anoint their newest member of the football king, goalscorer Dovbyk. For Zinchenko, this was his baptism as the Nation’s Hero if he was the golden boy they were looking for.

Ironically, in extra time. The scriptwriters may have used up their best material for the round of 16, but the bald man walking on the pitch leading the security guards to a happy dance as Dovbyk went home didn’t care. His inhibitions (or what to start with) were swept away in the flood of emotions.

There was a 26-man attack in front of the shelter as submarines, doctors and trainers approached as socially as possible. Shevchenko didn’t know what to do. He turned to the bench and waited for others, anyone, to sprint down the stairs and join him. They had already lost it, however, so he and his goalkeeper yelled at each other for the next five seconds to make sure they weren’t in a trance. All around Hampden, yellow bags jumped and linked, while other yellow bags sank deeper into her chair.

The moment when Artem Dovbyk sent Ukraine into the quarter-finals… ?# bbceuro2020 # Euro2020 #UKR #SWEUKR

– BBC Sports (@BBCSport) June 29, 2021

It hadn’t come. It wasn’t expected. The double bill on Monday, two goal comebacks to scare Spain into extra time and eliminate world champions France on penalties; the hype surrounding the meeting of the two heavyweights England and Germany a few hours earlier at Wembley Stadium. Would you like to pursue this?

It was like a damp primer. Sweden, a functioning team that built their success on solid foundations against Ukraine, which had disappointed so far and qualified fourth and last-best third-place thanks to a single win over North Macedonia. Maybe the group stage elimination should be tougher. Maybe it dilutes the quality. Or how about maybe we all shut up and let soccer get on our nerves and our imaginations like it has for the past 17 days?

(Photo: Andy Buchanan / POOL / AFP via Getty Images)

It was billed as a clash of two styles, but it didn’t play out that way. Which team was the better team was a game that depended on preferences. Sweden attacked more determinedly but Ukraine held the ball for long periods and set the pace at which they were comfortable.

In the group stage, Ukraine had prevailed in their 3-2 loss to the Netherlands, but they looked open while they stood stale against Austria and had their lead out of control in their victory over North Macedonia.

Shevchenko was careful in his selection, leaving out midfielders Vitaliy Mykolenko and Ruslan Malinovskyi when he switched from 4-3-3 to a 5-3-2 system. As the most talented player, Zinchenko is used in midfield by Ukraine to maximize his influence in attack, but here he has been transferred to the left full-back, a more natural position for him at club level.

Meanwhile, Sweden remained faithful to the 4-4-2 form in defense, but were much more fluid and efficient in possession.

A right combination of Mikael Lustig, 34, and Sebastian Larsson, 36, may not seem like that, but their reliability played a role in their structure that should free their talisman Emil Forsberg. Manager Janne Andersson used Lustig in the same way as Brendan Rodgers at Celtic, with the full-back plugging in a three-way chain and compensating for Ludwig Augustinsson’s more advanced position on the opposite side.

It allowed Forsberg to roam inside along with Dejan Kulusevski, who played against Alexander Isak. The trio traded and bonded well on the edge of the box, but much of the game was always decided by which team, made up of largely functional players, could get it to their wizards most often.

Forsberg seemed to be laying yellow brick streets that only he could see as he turned and snaked through the gaps. Ukraine, meanwhile, struggled to get Zinchenko high on the ball, but the system’s advantage began to show in the middle of the first half when they started outnumbering Swedes in the middle of the park, taking advantage of the width of the full-backs.

It was decisive for the opening goal in the 27th minute when Mykola Shaparenko twisted the ball to the right and Yarmolenko flicked a ball against the back post with the outside of his shoe. Then Zinchenko steamed, who shot his shot past Robin Olsen before sprinting away like a hypnotized Pikachu with an ashen face and dead eyes.

Sweden had their chances but Kulusevski turned a shot he should have hit and Forsberg was caught under a cross. The goal seemed to awaken a new urgency, and Forsberg began to move more centrally to connect with Kulusevski and Isak. The equalizer came with less precision, but style was superfluous at the time. Forsberg saw his shot deflected over Georgiy Bushchan.

The second half came to life early on when Serhiy Sydorchuk glanced at the goalkeeper from inside the box, but his shot hit the outside of the post.

A wake up call? Sweden went to the other side with Isak and Forsberg, as if he had had enough of fooling around, whipped the ball into the far corner. It jumped off the base of the post and into safety.

A stalemate was never inevitable for two cautious teams, but the red card to Marcus Danielson in the 98th minute put an end to Sweden’s hopes of a win without a penalty. The center-back stormed a volley after the ball came off, but although he cleared the ball with good contact, his swing caused his cleats to hit halfway up Artem Besedin’s leg. It was an impact enough to make the crowd collectively flinch when the hyperextension of the knee was shown on the screen. However, the subsequent VAR review may not give the referee full appreciation of the unfortunate nature of the challenge as it started with a freeze frame of contact and slowed the incident down.

Besedin, who had come on just seven minutes earlier, had to come off but Shevchenko’s next substitution was crucial.

Despite the numerical advantage and the six changes on both sides, the extra time looked like two boxers would like to play the last round and secure their chances on the scorecards.

So when the ball was knocked out, there was little anticipation. Zinchenko was the player, however, and the full-back / full-back / central midfielder / attacking midfielder – let’s bet the utility man – is as wild and relentless as anyone else.

He took a touch from the feet and delivered a flank into an area. There are some crosses that need to be spot on and others that you see a gap on and leave the rest to fate. Dovbyk found himself between Victor Lindelof and Filip Helander and simply shot towards the goal. Lindelof hadn’t blocked the front post and Helander hadn’t covered himself.

It was the corridor of uncertainty, it was the corridor of certainty. ‘Come on, son, just go in’. Dovbyk did.

How he was there in the first place is another part of the story. Had the pandemic not come and ruined civilization, the great striker would not have flashed his GPS vest in Brandi Chastain style in front of the world’s cameras.

He has not yet reached the heights he expected when he was first called up to the senior national team in 2016 at the age of 19. It was not until March of this year that he reached his first international match. Tuesday in Hampden was his first taste of tournament football.

His club SC Dnipro-1 has a history of its own as some ultras see the club, founded in 2017, as a way to overwrite the history of the previous club, which was called Dnipro. Dovbyk left the original club and spent two years in Denmark at Midtjylland and SönderjyskE before returning to Dnipro.

It took him sixteen minutes to write his name in folklore and become the man who took Ukraine to a place they had never been before. His header with exactly 120: 37 was after the Turkish Semih Senturk in 2008 against Croatia, the second last goal in the history of the European Championship.

It meant delirium and desolation.

(Photo by Andrew Milligan / PA Images via Getty Images)

Get full access to exclusive stories.

Subscribe to The Athletic for ad-free, in-depth coverage of your favorite players, teams, leagues and clubs. Try us out for a week.


Hartford Man Urges Warning With Fee App After Cash Reaches Mistaken Person – NBC Connecticut

More people than ever are picking up their phones to make payments. And with the coronavirus crisis, more money is changing hands at a social distance thanks to money transfer apps. But one Hartford man has a warning because hundreds of his hard-earned dollars didn’t make it into the right hands.

“I mean, I was a huge Cash App fan,” said Eric Crawford, who currently runs a family resource center in Hartford.

The former member of the State Board of Pardons and Paroles joined NBC CT Responds after experiencing a problem with the money transfer app.

“$ 500 for anyone is a decent amount of money, but it didn’t change my life, but life would have changed for someone in my community.”

Crawford said he sent a $ 450 payment to his son Kevin’s fitness trainer earlier this year through the Cash app, a payment he’d made periodically to Kevin through that app.

“The coach calls me and says, ‘Eric, you didn’t pay the money for your son.” And I said, “Yeah, I did.”

Crawford said after checking his Cash App account history, he found that the Kevin who received the payment wasn’t the same Kevin he was in his phone contacts.

“No phone number, nothing, it was just like someone immediately put some kind of fake Kevin on the screen to throw you off,” Crawford said.

Crawford contacted Cash App customer service via email but said that after investigating his account history, he closed the case for authorizing the transaction.

Even though the money was withdrawn from his bank account, the payment appears to be pending in the app to this day.

“Where’s the money? He never got it. There’s no email confirmation that I even sent it to the wrong person,” Crawford said.

NBC Connecticut can’t confirm if the other Kevin ever received the money, what that person’s intentions were, or if it was a user error, but Crawford firmly believes it wasn’t his fault.

The Cash app says that if a customer sends money to someone they think isn’t on their contact list, they’ll send a double prompt to make sure they want to send money to the account.

Crawford says it didn’t and his transaction didn’t trigger the typical email notification he usually receives when making a payment.
Cash App will not comment on individual cases, but emails to Crawford suggested that their account should continue to be secured.

In a statement, a Cash App spokesperson said: “Fraud prevention is critical to Cash App. We continue to invest in and strengthen anti-fraud resources by both adding staff and introducing new technology. We are constantly improving systems and controls to prevent, detect and report bad activity on the platform. “

The Attorney General and the Ministry of Consumer Protection warn that there are risks associated with using online payment apps.

“Remember, when you sign up for a credit card or bank account, there is usually adequate protection for those products that you are paying for, by the way,” said Connecticut Attorney General William Tong.

He says there’s a reason this app and others like Venmo and PayPal have minimal fees.

“When you sign up for something that’s faster, cheaper, easier, everything is faster, cheaper, easier.”

And with that, says Tong, you can’t expect great customer service either.
Tong’s office says they have received eight complaints about Cash App since this summer.

“We’re definitely looking into it and I’m talking to other states about it because even if it’s not illegal it doesn’t make it right, but at the end of the day you’re the downside of that with something that’s an online app. It’s not a bank. It’s not a credit card company, ”said Tong.

He and the state consumer protection ministry urge users of these apps to be careful.

“When you make payments through an app, the entire responsibility rests with you,” said DCP Deputy Commissioner Arunan Aulampalam.

They say double and triple check whoever you’re sending money, including all of the username details.

DCP also warns against sending money to people you do not know.

“Make sure you double-check wherever you’re sending the money, as the same way it will give an envelope to someone you don’t know. You are literally passing money on to someone else, and once that money is out of your hands, it’s a lot harder to get back. “

In addition, it is important to use passwords that are as secure as possible and two-factor identification whenever possible.

Crawford says his bank fortunately made up for his loss, but he hopes telling his story will educate the community and help make changes with these apps in the future.
If he had known what he knows now, he would never have used a money transfer app.

“This is our hard earned money. We already have this pandemic and everything else is underway, ”he said.

From now on, he’s going to pay Kevin the old-fashioned way.

“I’m going back to the old checks and paying cash. I think that’s the safest thing to do. “

Cash App will notify NBC Connecticut that if you believe you may have been a victim of fraud you should contact NBC Connecticut through App Support or their website. They say the Cash app never asks customers to send them money. Additionally, they said they will never request a customer’s PIN or login code outside of the app.