Amy Coney Barrett Rebuffs Calls for To Recuse From Darkish Cash Case Involving Group That Supported Her Affirmation

Top line

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett declined to withdraw Monday’s case involving a Conservative group that, despite being Democrats, had spent at least $ 1 million on endorsement of its Senate call her to do so because of the alleged conflict of interest.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett is sworn in on the South Lawn of the White House … [+] October 26, 2020.

Getty Images

Key factors

The Supreme Court opened on Monday Americans for Prosperity Foundation v Rodriquez, a case brought forward by the conservative Americans for Prosperity Foundation that challenged California’s policy of requiring charities to disclose their donors to the state, which the group allegedly violates the First Amendment.

Americans for Prosperity (AFP), a conservative advocacy group backed by billionaire David Koch, who is separate from but affiliated with the education-focused foundation, launched a major advertising campaign last year that featured the Senators have been asked to support Barrett’s endorsement said They planned to output “seven-digit numbers”.

Legislators Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (DR.I.), Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), And Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) Had sent Barrett a letter asking them to investigate the case, or at least withdraw the case Publicly state your reasons for doing so and say that hearing the case would conflict with the Supreme Court precedent in the past.

Barrett heard the case on Monday and asked questions to the petitioners and respondents and did not make a public statement regarding their decision.

The judiciary appeared skeptical of California politics, signaling that it would likely be on the side of the Americans for Prosperity Foundation during the hearing, and asked a California state attorney to “assume that I believe these petitioners are have shown considerable strain on politics “imposes their initial adjustment rights.

The Supreme Court has not yet responded to a request for comment on Barrett’s decision not to reuse.

Chief critic

“AFP claims to have played a significant and disproportionate role in the campaign for your confirmation in the Supreme Court while the case of its siblings was pending and imminent,” lawmakers wrote in their letter to Barrett.

tangent

In addition to Barrett, AFP has also spent large sums of money to support the endorsements of Judges Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Whitehouse’s office told Forbes last week that Barrett’s need for reuse was “particularly worrying” as its confirmation came while the AFP case was pending.

What to look for

How the Supreme Court will rule on the case. The conservative court seemed possibly likely to stand on the side of the Americans for Prosperity Foundation on Monday, with many of the judges repeatedly cracking down on attorneys defending California politics and expressing skepticism that the donors disclosed to them will never be made public, the organization feared. “Do you think that for someone who wishes to make a significant contribution to an organization that has been accused of being racist or homophobic or white supremacist, it would be reasonable to be chilled in this environment because they have less or no trust ? that your contribution will be treated confidentially? “Judge Clarence Thomas asked an attorney to defend the policy.

Key background

Legislature opposition to Barrett, who is hearing the case, is part of a wider concern about the influence so-called dark money groups have on the court. Whitehouse described the influence of these conservative activist groups and their judicial spending as “a pretty big deal” during Barrett’s confirmation hearing and according to the Senate of experts testimony, conservative activist Leonard Leo spent more than $ 400 million on his campaign to influence the judiciary between 2014 and 2018 alone. Whitehouse and Johnson quarreled at the same time op-ed for Project Syndicate last week that conservative groups like AFP donate money to set up sympathetic judges and then take cases to court and file coordinated amicus briefs as a “final move in a massive court conquest”. “The AFP / AFPF operation’s” sweeping campaign “for your confirmation makes it clear that our judiciary is a target of this massive apparatus of influence,” lawmakers wrote in their letter to Barrett, explaining why they should withdraw from the case.

further reading

Democratic lawmakers are urging Amy Coney Barrett to step back from the Dark Money Case group that supported her endorsement (Forbes)

The Supreme Court appears to be wary of California’s Donor Disclosure Act (The hill)

Former leisure reporter Rona Barrett now dedicates her life to serving to seniors

SANTA YNEZ (KABC) – In the television reporter world, Rona Barrett started it all on ABC7 many years ago.

She’s working hard these days to make life easier for our seniors.

She created something in Santa Ynez that she believes can be recreated across the country.

The Golden Inn & Village is now celebrating five successful years.

It wasn’t easy to achieve.

“I’ve seen everyone under the sun,” said Barrett. “Everyone said, ‘No, you can’t. No, you can’t.’ I said, ‘Yes we can.’ “

It took her seven years to convince the Santa Barbara Housing Authority to work with her. The result: the Golden Inn & Village, affordable housing and support services for low-income seniors. It is now considered a model for caring for our aging population.

“It has to be combined with your community, your government, locally and nationally, and it has to be the people who are really big money in this country and interested in being philanthropic,” Barrett said.

The past year has been tough due to the pandemic, and the nonprofit Rona Barrett Foundation reached out to Mailer for help. And it worked. “All of a sudden people would call and say, ‘How can I help? How can I help?’ And I would say, send the money because I have to start a nutrition program here. I have to make sure my people don’t go hungry, “she said.

They now offer three hot meals a week for residents.

In Rona’s previous entertainment reporter career, she interviewed Hollywood’s biggest stars and made many friends in the process.

Among them: Cher stepping straight on the plate, doing a PSA for the foundation, and asking the audience to “please contribute in any way they can”.

Barrett said, “I don’t care if you send me two dollars or two pennies as long as you send me something, and I can make life better for someone I know is not at their best at this point in life Constitution was. “

The seniors who live at the Golden Inn & Village pay 30% of their social security. About 60 seniors are currently residents, but Barrett’s vision is to add another building to help at least 60 more.

Barrett said, “You bought me a shovel of gold by the way, and I can’t wait to put that shovel back in the ground. That’s all I have to say.”

One of the Rona Barrett Foundation’s missions is to ensure seniors know that there is a future for them and that more good times are to come.

Barrett had a lot more to say. You can see more on our free ABC-7 Los Angeles app. You can find it on Roku, Amazon Fire, Apple TV, and Android TV.

Copyright © 2021 KABC-TV. All rights reserved.